IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v81y1967i1p58-87..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Firm Decision Process: An Econometric Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis C. Mueller

Abstract

I. A general formulation of the model, 59. — II. The choice of dependent variables, 61. — III. The capital investment equation, 64. — IV. The R & D equation, 71. — V. The advertising equation, 74. — VI. The dividends equation, 75. — VII. An appraisal of the model, 77. — VIII. Policy implications of the results, 81. — IX. Conclusion, 84. — Appendix, 84.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis C. Mueller, 1967. "The Firm Decision Process: An Econometric Investigation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 81(1), pages 58-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:81:y:1967:i:1:p:58-87.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1879673
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goergen, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R. & Correia Da Silva, L., 2004. "Dividend Policy of German Firms," Other publications TiSEM 13d8dd39-20ab-48b4-991e-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Dietmar Harhoff, 1998. "Are there Financing Constraints for R&D and Investment in German Manufacturing Firms," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 49-50, pages 421-456.
    3. Guiso, Luigi, 1998. "High-tech firms and credit rationing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 39-59, March.
    4. Alex Coad, 2008. "Distance to Frontier and Appropriate Business Strategy," LEM Papers Series 2008/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Yu Lu, 2017. "Seeking Finance, Perceived Financial Constraints and R&D Engagement," Post-Print hal-02559421, HAL.
    6. Bhavish Jugurnath & Mark Stewart & Robert Brooks, 2008. "Dividend taxation and corporate investment: a comparative study between the classical system and imputation system of dividend taxation in the United States and Australia," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 209-224, August.
    7. Zoltan J. Acs & David B. Audretsch, 2005. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2005-21, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    8. John J. Beggs, 1981. "The Dynamic Interaction Between Industry Level Profits and Research and Development," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 588, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    9. M. Scerri, 1988. "Research and Development in South African Manufacturing Industries," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 56(2‐3), pages 67-75, June.
    10. Dirk Czarnitzki & Hanna Hottenrott, 2011. "Financial Constraints: Routine Versus Cutting Edge R&D Investment," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 121-157, March.
    11. Gugler, Klaus, 2003. "Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation between dividends, R&D, and capital investment," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 1297-1321, July.
    12. Fernau, Erik & Hirsch, Stefan, 2019. "What drives dividend smoothing? A meta regression analysis of the Lintner model," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 255-273.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:81:y:1967:i:1:p:58-87.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.