IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v40y2024i1p76-107..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big Fish in Small (and Big) Ponds: A Study of Careers

Author

Listed:
  • Jed DeVaro
  • Oliver Gürtler
  • Marc Gürtler
  • Christian Deutscher

Abstract

Talented, ambitious workers (big fish) often join highly competitive organizations (big ponds), though they sometimes instead choose less competitive organizations (small ponds) offering brighter promotion prospects. Big fish exist in both types of organizations, though average worker ability is higher in big ponds. Top executives enjoy higher wages in big ponds. Choosing a big pond allows workers to signal high ability. Workers sometimes overestimate or underestimate their abilities, choosing the wrong pond. Big ponds tend to be larger in total employment. All of the preceding phenomena are shown to be consistent with equilibrium in a new theoretical model of careers. (JEL J24, M53)

Suggested Citation

  • Jed DeVaro & Oliver Gürtler & Marc Gürtler & Christian Deutscher, 2024. "Big Fish in Small (and Big) Ponds: A Study of Careers," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 76-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:40:y:2024:i:1:p:76-107.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewac006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • M53 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Training

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:40:y:2024:i:1:p:76-107.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.