How do People Choose Between Biased Information Sources? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Brandts, Jordi & Busom, Isabel & Lopez-Mayan, Cristina & Panadés, Judith, 2022.
"Dispelling misconceptions about economics,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
- Jordi Brandts & Isabel Busom & Cristina Lopez-Mayan & Judith Panadés, 2019. "Dispelling Misconceptions about Economics," Working Papers 1096, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Evan M. Calford & Anujit Charkraborty, 2022.
"The Value of and Demand for Diverse News Sources,"
ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics
2022-688, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
- Anujit Chakraborty & Evan Calford, 2023. "The value of and demand for diverse news sources," Working Papers 355, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
- Felix Chopra & Ingar K. Haaland & Christopher Roth, 2022.
"The Demand for News: Accuracy Concerns Versus Belief Confirmation Motives,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
9673, CESifo.
- Chopra, Felix & Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2023. "The Demand for News: Accuracy Concerns versus Belief Confirmation Motives," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 1/2023, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
- Felix Chopra & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth, 2022. "The Demand for News: Accuracy Concerns versus Belief Confirmation Motives," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 157, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
- Roth, Christopher & Chopra, Felix & Haaland, Ingar, 2022. "The Demand for News: Accuracy Concerns versus Belief Confirmation Motives," CEPR Discussion Papers 17169, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Vladimir Novak & Andrei Matveenko & Silvio Ravaioli, 2021.
"The Status Quo and Belief Polarization of Inattentive Agents: Theory and Experiment,"
Working Papers
674, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- VladimÃr Novák & Andrei Matveenko & Silvio Ravaioli, 2023. "The Status Quo and Belief Polarization of Inattentive Agents: Theory and Experiment," Working and Discussion Papers WP 5/2023, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.
- Vladimir Novak & Andrei Matveenko & Silvio Ravaioli, 2023. "The Status Quo and Belief Polarization of Inattentive Agents: Theory and Experiment," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_385, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Castagnetti, Alessandro & Schmacker, Renke, 2022. "Protecting the ego: Motivated information selection and updating," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
- Islam, Marco, 2021. "Motivated Risk Assessments," Working Papers 2021:12, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 26 Jul 2022.
- Aljoscha Minnich & Hauke Roggenkamp & Andreas Lange, 2023. "Ambiguity Attitudes and Surprises: Experimental Evidence on Communicating New Information within a Large Population Sample," CESifo Working Paper Series 10783, CESifo.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:19:y:2021:i:3:p:1656-1691.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.