IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v16y2016i4p781-803..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic effects of owner distance and local property management in US office markets

Author

Listed:
  • Piet Eichholtz
  • Rogier Holtermans
  • Erkan Yönder

Abstract

Using a large dataset of US offices we analyse the relationship between investors’ distance to their assets and the effective rent of these assets, and study the extent to which property managers can influence this relationship. We construct hedonic rent models to control for other known rent determinants. It turns out that proximity matters: holding everything else constant, investors located closely to their office buildings are able to extract significantly higher effective rents from these assets, especially if these buildings are of low quality. This effect is due to significant differences in occupancy levels. Interestingly, property managers can affect this relationship, mitigating the adverse effects of investor distance on effective office rents. Especially if the owner does not reside in the same state as the building, external property management is of importance, most prominently so for class-B office buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Piet Eichholtz & Rogier Holtermans & Erkan Yönder, 2016. "The economic effects of owner distance and local property management in US office markets," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 781-803.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:16:y:2016:i:4:p:781-803.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeg/lbv018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhilan Feng & Maneechit Pattanapanchai & S. McKay Price & C. F. Sirmans, 2021. "Geographic diversification in real estate investment trusts," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(1), pages 267-286, March.
    2. Irem Demirci & Piet Eichholtz & Erkan Yönder, 2020. "Corporate Diversification and the Cost of Debt," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 316-368, October.
    3. Fuerst, Franz & Mansley, Nick & Wang, Zilong, 2021. "Do specialist funds outperform? Evidence from European non-listed real estate funds," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Daniel Broxterman & Tingyu Zhou, 2023. "Information Frictions in Real Estate Markets: Recent Evidence and Issues," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 203-298, February.
    5. David C. Ling & Andy Naranjo & Milena T. Petrova, 2018. "Search Costs, Behavioral Biases, and Information Intermediary Effects," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 114-151, July.
    6. Avis Devine & Isabelle Jolin & Nils Kok & Erkan Yönder, 2024. "How Gender Diversity Shapes Cities: Evidence from Risk Management Decisions in REITs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 723-741, February.
    7. Gong, Cynthia M. & Lizieri, Colin & Bao, Helen X.H., 2019. "“Smarter information, smarter consumers”? Insights into the housing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 51-64.
    8. Eichholtz, Piet & Ongena, Steven & Simeth, Nagihan & Yönder, Erkan, 2023. "Banks, non-banks, and the incorporation of local information in CMBS loan pricing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Martin Jurkovic & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Internationale Büroimmobilien-Investoren: Preisprämien aufgrund von Selektionsverzerrungen? [International office investors: price premiums due to “selection bias”?]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:16:y:2016:i:4:p:781-803.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/joeg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.