IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v33y2006i2p248-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Trademark Dilution

Author

Listed:
  • Maureen Morrin
  • Jonathan Lee
  • Greg M. Allenby

Abstract

A hierarchical Bayes associative network model for brand information is developed and tested to measure the extent of harm from trademark dilution. In the proposed model, category activation thresholds are modeled in terms of brand/category familiarity, activation flows are modeled in terms of relative category knowledge, and consumer confusion and its correlates are used to capture the asymmetric effects of dilution on retrieval probabilities for first and second users. (c) 2006 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

Suggested Citation

  • Maureen Morrin & Jonathan Lee & Greg M. Allenby, 2006. "Determinants of Trademark Dilution," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 248-257, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:33:y:2006:i:2:p:248-257
    DOI: 10.1086/506305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/506305
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/506305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bin Yang & Tao Yuan, 2022. "Trademark and IPO underpricing," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 271-296, March.
    2. Lesley Chiou & Catherine Tucker, 2012. "How Does the Use of Trademarks by Third-Party Sellers Affect Online Search?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 819-837, September.
    3. Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li & Qin Li & Siew Hong Teoh & Kevin Tseng, 2022. "Valuation of New Trademarks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 257-279, January.
    4. Roster, Catherine A., 2014. "Cultural influences on global firms' decisions to cut the strategic brand ties that bind: A commentary essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 486-488.
    5. Naveen Kumar & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "A Hashtag Is Worth a Thousand Words: An Empirical Investigation of Social Media Strategies in Trademarking Hashtags," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1403-1427, December.
    6. Macías Washington & Cerviño Julio, 2017. "Trademark dilution: comparing the effects of blurring and tarnishment cases over brand equity," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 346-360, September.
    7. Johan M. Berlin & Eric D. Carlström, 2015. "Cultural camouflage—a critical study of how artefacts are camouflaged and mental health policy subverted," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 111-126, April.
    8. Yang, Shuai & Carlson, Jeffrey R. & Chen, Sixing, 2020. "How augmented reality affects advertising effectiveness: The mediating effects of curiosity and attention toward the ad," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Nelson Borges Amaral, 2020. "What can be done to address luxury counterfeiting? An integrative review of tactics and strategies," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 691-709, November.
    10. Melnyk, Valentyna & Giarratana, Marco & Torres, Anna, 2014. "Marking your trade: Cultural factors in the prolongation of trademarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 478-485.
    11. David C. Mauer & Natalia Villatoro & Yilei Zhang, 2022. "Brand equity and corporate debt structure," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7-8), pages 1077-1112, July.
    12. Femke van Horen & Rik Pieters & Darren DahlEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2017. "Out-of-Category Brand Imitation: Product Categorization Determines Copycat Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 816-832.
    13. S. Umit Kucuk, 2016. "Exploring the Legality of Consumer Anti-branding Activities in the Digital Age," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 77-93, November.
    14. Anurag Dugar & Y. L. R. Moorthi, 2023. "Deliberately Causing Brand Confusion: State of the (Unfair) Art," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 112-136, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:33:y:2006:i:2:p:248-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.