IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-658884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bringing Us Together or Driving Us Apart: The Effect of Soliciting Consumer Input on Consumers' Propensity to Transact with an Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Liu
  • David Gal

Abstract

This research examines a novel process by which soliciting consumer input can affect subsequent purchase and engagement, namely, by changing consumers' subjective perception of their relationship with the organization. We contrast different types of consumer input and propose that, relative to no input, soliciting advice tends to have an intimacy effect whereby the individual feels closer to the organization, resulting in increases in subsequent propensity to transact and engage with the organization. However, soliciting expectations tends to have the opposite effect, distancing the individual from the organization. We demonstrate these relationship effects of consumer input in four studies involving both nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Implications for theory and practice of brand relationship as well as consumer judgment and decision making are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Liu & David Gal, 2011. "Bringing Us Together or Driving Us Apart: The Effect of Soliciting Consumer Input on Consumers' Propensity to Transact with an Organization," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(2), pages 242-259.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/658884
    DOI: 10.1086/658884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/658884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/658884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/658884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine Farrow & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2018. "What in the Word! The Scope for the Effect of Word Choice on Economic Behavior," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 557-580, November.
    2. Allen, B.J. & Dholakia, Utpal M. & Basuroy, Suman, 2016. "The Economic Benefits to Retailers from Customer Participation in Proprietary Web Panels," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 147-161.
    3. Carina Thürridl & Frauke Mattison Thompson, 2023. "Making brand activism successful: How advice-giving can boost support behavior and reap benefits for the brand," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 685-696, December.
    4. Cassandra France & Debra Grace & Joseph Lo Iacono & Joan Carlini, 0. "Exploring the interplay between customer perceived brand value and customer brand co-creation behaviour dimensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    5. Lee, Sun Young & Kim, Yeuseung & Kim, Young, 2021. "Engaging consumers with corporate social responsibility campaigns: The roles of interactivity, psychological empowerment, and identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 507-517.
    6. Elizabeth Han & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2023. "Bots with Feelings: Should AI Agents Express Positive Emotion in Customer Service?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1296-1311, September.
    7. Paul W. Fombelle & Sterling A. Bone & Katherine N. Lemon, 2016. "Responding to the 98%: face-enhancing strategies for dealing with rejected customer ideas," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 685-706, November.
    8. Hyun Ju Jeong & Jihye Kim, 2021. "Human-like versus me-like brands in corporate social responsibility: the effectiveness of brand anthropomorphism on social perceptions and buying pleasure of brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 32-47, January.
    9. Stuart Read & Stefan Michel & Jan H. Schumann & Kumar Rakesh Ranjan, 2019. "Pricing co-created value: an integrative framework and research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 155-183, December.
    10. Huang, Ran & Ha, Sejin, 2020. "The effects of warmth-oriented and competence-oriented service recovery messages on observers on online platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 616-627.
    11. Cassandra France & Debra Grace & Joseph Lo Iacono & Joan Carlini, 2020. "Exploring the interplay between customer perceived brand value and customer brand co-creation behaviour dimensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 466-480, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/658884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.