IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v16y1989i2p229-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Regional-Level Input Demand for French Agriculture Using a Translog Production Function

Author

Listed:
  • Bonnieux, Francois

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to estimate a system of input demand responses for French agriculture, supposed to be in static equilibrium with respects to all inputs. A translog production function with regional dummies is specified. The adjusted model is well-behaved for a large region in the input space and, therefore, allows general conclusions. First, input separability is rejected. The technical separability of materials for all primary inputs is quite large. Moreover, there is a substitutability relationship (except for intensive livestock farming) between labor and capital, land and labor, but capital and land are complements. Copyright 1989 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonnieux, Francois, 1989. "Estimating Regional-Level Input Demand for French Agriculture Using a Translog Production Function," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 16(2), pages 229-241.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:16:y:1989:i:2:p:229-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petrick, Martin & Kloss, Mathias, 2013. "Identifying Factor Productivity from Micro-data: The case of EU agriculture," Working papers 144004, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Shumway, C. Richard & Davis, George C., 2001. "Does consistent aggregation really matter?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-34.
    3. Abler, David G. & Shortle, James S., 1991. "Innovation And Environmental Quality," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271266, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Garcia, Roberto J. & Randall, Alan, 1991. "DERIVING SUPPLY ELASTICITIES FROM COST OF PRODUCTION ESTIMATION: THE EFFECT OF FERTILIZER POLICY ON U.S., FRENCH, and U.K. WHEAT AND CORN PRODUCTION," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271367, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. repec:zbw:iamodp:271870 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Msangi, Siwa & Rosegrant, Mark, 2007. "A Closer Look at the IMPACT of Climate Change on Country-Level Food Security and Nutrition," Conference papers 331635, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Abler, David G & Shortle, James S, 1992. "Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the EC," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 197-217.
    8. Góral, Justyna & Rembisz, Włodzimierz, 2020. "The Model of Demand for Production Factors in Agriculture," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311224, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    9. Friedrich Schneider & Klaus Salhofer & Erwin Schmid & Gerhard Streicher, 2001. "Was the Austrian agricultural policy least cost efficient?," Economics working papers 2001-03, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    10. Pellegrina, Heitor S., 2022. "Trade, productivity, and the spatial organization of agriculture: Evidence from Brazil," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:16:y:1989:i:2:p:229-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.