IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v105y2018i3p665-680..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A semiparametric extension of the stochastic block model for longitudinal networks

Author

Listed:
  • C Matias
  • T Rebafka
  • F Villers

Abstract

SummaryWe propose an extension of the stochastic block model for recurrent interaction events in continuous time, where every individual belongs to a latent group and conditional interactions between two individuals follow an inhomogeneous Poisson process with intensity driven by the individuals’ latent groups. We show that the model is identifiable and estimate it with a semiparametric variational expectation-maximization algorithm. We develop two versions of the method, one using a nonparametric histogram approach with an adaptive choice of the partition size, and the other using kernel intensity estimators. We select the number of latent groups by an integrated classification likelihood criterion. We demonstrate the performance of our procedure on synthetic experiments, analyse two datasets to illustrate the utility of our approach, and comment on competing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • C Matias & T Rebafka & F Villers, 2018. "A semiparametric extension of the stochastic block model for longitudinal networks," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 665-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:105:y:2018:i:3:p:665-680.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asy016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric W. Fox & Martin B. Short & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Kathryn D. Coronges & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2016. "Modeling E-mail Networks and Inferring Leadership Using Self-Exciting Point Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 564-584, April.
    2. Patrick O. Perry & Patrick J. Wolfe, 2013. "Point process modelling for directed interaction networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(5), pages 821-849, November.
    3. Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
    4. Bordes, Laurent & Chauveau, Didier & Vandekerkhove, Pierre, 2007. "A stochastic EM algorithm for a semiparametric mixture model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5429-5443, July.
    5. Petter Holme, 2015. "Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 88(9), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Robin, Stephane & Bar-Hen, Avner & Daudin, Jean-Jacques & Pierre, Laurent, 2007. "A semi-parametric approach for mixture models: Application to local false discovery rate estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5483-5493, August.
    7. Catherine Matias & Vincent Miele, 2017. "Statistical clustering of temporal networks through a dynamic stochastic block model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1119-1141, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hledik, Juraj & Rastelli, Riccardo, 2020. "A dynamic network model to measure exposure diversification in the Austrian interbank market," ESRB Working Paper Series 109, European Systemic Risk Board.
    2. Riccardo Rastelli & Michael Fop, 2020. "A stochastic block model for interaction lengths," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 485-512, June.
    3. Yanqiao Zheng & Xiaobing Zhao & Xiaoqi Zhang & Xinyue Ye & Qiwen Dai, 2019. "Mining the Hidden Link Structure from Distribution Flows for a Spatial Social Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-17, May.
    4. Paul Riverain & Simon Fossier & Mohamed Nadif, 2023. "Poisson degree corrected dynamic stochastic block model," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(1), pages 135-162, March.
    5. Tom A.B. Snijders & Malick Faye & Julien Brailly, 2020. "Network dynamics with a nested node set: Sociability in seven villages in Senegal," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 300-323, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaspers, Stijn & Aerts, Marc & Verbeke, Geert & Beloeil, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "A new semi-parametric mixture model for interval censored data, with applications in the field of antimicrobial resistance," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 30-42.
    2. Daizaburo Shizuka & Allison E Johnson & Leigh Simmons, 2020. "How demographic processes shape animal social networks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 1-11.
    3. Paul Riverain & Simon Fossier & Mohamed Nadif, 2023. "Poisson degree corrected dynamic stochastic block model," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(1), pages 135-162, March.
    4. Riccardo Rastelli & Michael Fop, 2020. "A stochastic block model for interaction lengths," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 485-512, June.
    5. Marino, Maria Francesca & Pandolfi, Silvia, 2022. "Hybrid maximum likelihood inference for stochastic block models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Dragana M. Pavlović & Bryan R.L. Guillaume & Soroosh Afyouni & Thomas E. Nichols, 2020. "Multi‐subject stochastic blockmodels with mixed effects for adaptive analysis of individual differences in human brain network cluster structure," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 363-396, August.
    7. Bartolucci, Francesco & Marino, Maria Francesca & Pandolfi, Silvia, 2018. "Dealing with reciprocity in dynamic stochastic block models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 86-100.
    8. Chabert-Liddell, Saint-Clair & Barbillon, Pierre & Donnet, Sophie & Lazega, Emmanuel, 2021. "A stochastic block model approach for the analysis of multilevel networks: An application to the sociology of organizations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Catherine Matias & Vincent Miele, 2017. "Statistical clustering of temporal networks through a dynamic stochastic block model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1119-1141, September.
    10. Alicja Grześkowiak, 2016. "Assessment of Participation in Cultural Activities in Poland by Selected Multivariate Methods," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, January -.
    11. Yunpeng Zhao & Qing Pan & Chengan Du, 2019. "Logistic regression augmented community detection for network data with application in identifying autism‐related gene pathways," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 222-234, March.
    12. Wu, Han-Ming & Tien, Yin-Jing & Chen, Chun-houh, 2010. "GAP: A graphical environment for matrix visualization and cluster analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 767-778, March.
    13. José E. Chacón, 2021. "Explicit Agreement Extremes for a 2 × 2 Table with Given Marginals," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(2), pages 257-263, July.
    14. F. Marta L. Di Lascio & Andrea Menapace & Roberta Pappadà, 2024. "A spatially‐weighted AMH copula‐based dissimilarity measure for clustering variables: An application to urban thermal efficiency," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    15. Yifan Zhu & Chongzhi Di & Ying Qing Chen, 2019. "Clustering Functional Data with Application to Electronic Medication Adherence Monitoring in HIV Prevention Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 238-261, July.
    16. Irene Vrbik & Paul McNicholas, 2015. "Fractionally-Supervised Classification," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(3), pages 359-381, October.
    17. Maurizio Vichi & Carlo Cavicchia & Patrick J. F. Groenen, 2022. "Hierarchical Means Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 553-577, November.
    18. Batool, Fatima & Hennig, Christian, 2021. "Clustering with the Average Silhouette Width," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Patrick D. Shay & Stephen S. Farnsworth Mick, 2017. "Clustered and distinct: a taxonomy of local multihospital systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 303-315, September.
    20. Roberto Rocci & Stefano Antonio Gattone & Roberto Di Mari, 2018. "A data driven equivariant approach to constrained Gaussian mixture modeling," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(2), pages 235-260, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:105:y:2018:i:3:p:665-680.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.