IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i4p955-967..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa A. Taylor
  • Kevin J. McGraw

Abstract

In many animals, males display colorful ornaments to females during courtship, the effectiveness of which depends on the ambient lighting environment. While a variety of hypotheses exist to explain both presence of and variation in such traits, many propose that they function as signals and that their presence is required for or improves successful mating. In Habronattus pyrrithrix jumping spiders, males display brilliant, condition-dependent red faces and green legs to drab gray/brown females during courtship. We designed 2 experiments to first test if coloration is required for successful mating and then whether the role of color changes under varying light conditions. In Experiment 1, we paired individual males with virgin females under laboratory lighting and found that blocking either their red or green coloration, or both, had no effect on success (likelihood of copulation, copulation duration, latency to copulation, female aggression, or cannibalism) when compared with sham-treated males. In Experiment 2, we gave virgin females the choice between 2 simultaneously courting males, one with his red coloration blocked and the other that received a sham treatment, and ran trials outdoors in both the sun and the shade. Blocking red facial coloration reduced a male’s ability to approach a female, but only when courting in the sun. These results suggest that ornamental coloration is not required for mating in H. pyrrithrix, but that red coloration improves success in certain contexts. We discuss implications for the evolution of elaborate, multimodal courtship displays by animals that interact in variable environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa A. Taylor & Kevin J. McGraw, 2013. "Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 955-967.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:955-967.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa C. K. Couldridge, 2002. "Color patterns and species recognition in four closely related species of Lake Malawi cichlid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 59-64, January.
    2. Damian O. Elias & Eileen A. Hebets & Ronald R. Hoy, 2006. "Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 765-771, September.
    3. Jan Heuschele & Miia Mannerla & Phillip Gienapp & Ulrika Candolin, 2009. "Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1223-1227.
    4. Nick Colegrave & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2003. "Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 446-447, May.
    5. Matthew L.M. Lim & Jingjing Li & Daiqin Li, 2008. "Effect of UV-reflecting markings on female mate-choice decisions in Cosmophasis umbratica, a jumping spider from Singapore," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 61-66.
    6. Eileen A. Hebets & Wayne P. Maddison, 2005. "Xenophilic mating preferences among populations of the jumping spider Habronattus pugillis Griswold," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(6), pages 981-988, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael E Vickers & Lisa A Taylor, 2018. "Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 833-839.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    2. Cuypers, I.R.P., 2009. "Essays on equity joint ventures, uncertainty and experience," Other publications TiSEM 8dc79e86-c625-467f-a450-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Teruhiko Takahara & Yukihiro Kohmatsu & Atsushi Maruyama & Hideyuki Doi & Hiroki Yamanaka & Ryohei Yamaoka, 2012. "Inducible defense behavior of an anuran tadpole: cue-detection range and cue types used against predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 863-868.
    4. Akin, Becci A., 2011. "Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 999-1011, June.
    5. Mary J. Montague & Marine Danek-Gontard & Hansjoerg P. Kunc, 2013. "Phenotypic plasticity affects the response of a sexually selected trait to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 343-348.
    6. Demetra Andreou & Christophe Eizaguirre & Thomas Boehm & Manfred Milinski, 2017. "Mate choice in sticklebacks reveals that immunogenes can drive ecological speciation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 953-961.
    7. Maciel, Everton A. & Martins, Valeria F. & de Paula, Mateus D. & Huth, Andreas & Guilherme, Frederico A.G. & Fischer, Rico & Giles, André & Barbosa, Reinaldo I. & Cavassan, Osmar & Martins, Fernando R, 2021. "Defaunation and changes in climate and fire frequency have synergistic effects on aboveground biomass loss in the brazilian savanna," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
    8. Bruns, Hendrik & Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena & Klement, Katharina & Luistro Jonsson, Marijane & Rahali, Bilel, 2016. "Can Nudges Be Transparent and Yet Effective?," WiSo-HH Working Paper Series 33, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory.
    9. Liu, S.Y. & Walter, S. & Marden, J. & Rehkopf, D.H. & Kubzansky, L.D. & Nguyen, T. & Glymour, M.M., 2015. "Genetic vulnerability to diabetes and obesity: Does education offset the risk?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 150-158.
    10. Minke B. W. Langenhof & Jan Komdeur, 2013. "Coping with Change: A Closer Look at the Underlying Attributes of Change and the Individual Response to Unstable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Pavel Linhart & Hans Slabbekoorn & Roman Fuchs, 2012. "The communicative significance of song frequency and song length in territorial chiffchaffs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1338-1347.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:4:p:955-967.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.