IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v74y1992i5p1126-1132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Contingent Valuation Measure Nonuse Values?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey K. Lazo
  • William D. Schulze
  • Gary H. McClelland
  • James K. Doyle

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey K. Lazo & William D. Schulze & Gary H. McClelland & James K. Doyle, 1992. "Can Contingent Valuation Measure Nonuse Values?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1126-1132.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:74:y:1992:i:5:p:1126-1132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242769
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Bennett, 1995. "The Value Of Farm Animal Welfare," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 46-60, January.
    2. Hatch, L. Upton & Hanson, Terrill R., 2001. "Change And Conflict In Land And Water Use: Resource Valuation In Conflict Resolution Among Competing Users," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-10, August.
    3. J.-D. Rinaudo & S. Aulong, 2014. "Defining Groundwater Remediation Objectives with Cost-benefit Analysis: Does It Work?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(1), pages 261-278, January.
    4. John C. Whitehead & George Van Houtven, "undated". "Methods for Valuing the Benefits of the Safe Drinking Water Act: Review and Assessment," Working Papers 9705, East Carolina University, Department of Economics.
    5. Cameron, Trudy Ann & Englin, Jeffrey, 1997. "Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 296-313, July.
    6. Jorgensen, Bradley S. & Syme, Geoffrey J. & Nancarrow, Blair E., 2006. "The role of uncertainty in the relationship between fairness evaluations and willingness to pay," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 104-124, January.
    7. Rondeau, Daniel & Rollins, Kimberely S. & Martin, Patrick, 1993. "Costly Information And Estimating Existence Values," 1993 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Orlando, Florida 271405, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Karine Latouche, 1999. "Farm animal welfare : French perception through contingent valuation method," Post-Print hal-02285598, HAL.
    9. W. George Hutchinson & Susan M. Chilton & John Davis, 1995. "Measuring Non‐Use Value Of Environmental Goods Using The Contingent Valuation Method: Problems Of Information And Cognition And The Application Of Cognitive Questionnaire Design Methods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 97-112, January.
    10. Powe, N.A. & Garrod, G.D. & McMahon, P.L., 2005. "Mixing methods within stated preference environmental valuation: choice experiments and post-questionnaire qualitative analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 513-526, March.
    11. Silva, Tiago Manuel & Silva, Susana & Carvalho, Armindo, 2022. "Economic valuation of urban parks with historical importance: The case of Quinta do Castelo, Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Lockwood, Michael, 1996. "Non-Compensatory Preference Structures In Non-Market Valuation Of Natural Area Policy," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:74:y:1992:i:5:p:1126-1132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.