IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v73y1991i3p724-733..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Technological Change in Diffusion Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mary K. Knudson

Abstract

The theoretical and empirical implications of a static and dynamic logistic diffusion model are compared. The dynamic model relaxes some assumptions of the static model by allowing for a flexible adoption ceiling, for changes in the technology, and for disadoption. Both models were used to estimate the diffusion of semi-dwarf wheat varieties in the United States. The dynamic model provides a better fit to the data and provides additional insights into the economic determinants of adoption. In particular, the importance of technological change in other areas (here, in fertilizer) on the diffusion path of an innovation was shown.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary K. Knudson, 1991. "Incorporating Technological Change in Diffusion Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 724-733.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:73:y:1991:i:3:p:724-733.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242824
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Labson, B Stephen & Gooday, Peter, 1994. "Factors influencing the diffusion of electric arc furnace steelmaking technology," MPRA Paper 70666, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Putra, Ahmad Romadhoni Surya & Pedersen, Søren Marcus & Liu, Zhen, 2019. "Biogas diffusion among small scale farmers in Indonesia: An application of duration analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 399-405.
    3. John C. Bernard & John D. Pesek, Jr. & Chunbo Fan, 2004. "Delaware farmers' adoption of GE soybeans in a time of uncertain U.S. adoption," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 81-94.
    4. Kimhi, Ayal & Rubin, Ofir D., 2006. "Assessing The Response Of Farm Households To Dairy Policy Reform In Israel," Discussion Papers 7134, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    5. Pulkki-Brännström, Anni-Maria & Stoneman, Paul, 2013. "On the patterns and determinants of the global diffusion of new technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1768-1779.
    6. Kinwa-Muzinga, Annie & Mazzocco, Michael A., 2000. "Preferred Price Paths Of Biotechnology-Derived Products: Time And Portfolio Affects," Transitions in Agbiotech: Economics of Strategy and Policy, June 24-25, 1999, Washington, D.C. 26031, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    7. Anchal Arora & Sangeeta Bansal, "undated". "Diffusion of Bt Cotton in India: Impact of Seed Prices and Technological Development," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 11-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    8. Sarah Wheeler & Henning Bjornlund & Martin Shanahan & Alec Zuo, 2009. "Who trades water allocations? Evidence of the characteristics of early adopters in the Goulburn–Murray Irrigation District, Australia 1998–1999*," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(6), pages 631-643, November.
    9. P. W. Heisey & K. A. Tetlay & Z. Ahmad & M. Ahmad, 1993. "Varietal Change In Post‐Green Revolution Agriculture: Empirical Evidence For Wheat In Pakistan," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 428-442, September.
    10. Rubas, Debra J. & Mjelde, James W. & Love, H. Alan, 2003. "Wheat Trade And The Adoption Of Enso-Based Forecasts: Different Scenarios," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22160, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Anderson, Jock R., 1993. "The Economics of New Technology Adaptation and Adoption," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(02-2), pages 1-9, August.
    12. Mohammad Torshizi & Richard Gray, 2022. "Adaptability and variety adoption: Implications for plant breeding policy in a changing climate," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(4), pages 842-859, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:73:y:1991:i:3:p:724-733.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.