IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v47y1965i3p681-695..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Representative Benchmark Farms for Supply Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Seamus J. Sheehy
  • R. H. McAlexander

Abstract

Many researchers have been associated with studies involving the use of results of benchmark farms in aggregation; however, only limited attention appears to have been given the effect of benchmark farm selection on aggregation bias. This paper is concerned with the selection procedure of such farms from a sample of farms, and in the aggregation of linear programming results of these benchmark farms in estimating the potential output of a major commodity for an area. Possible bias associated with a conventional method of selection is discussed, an alternative method of selection is presented, and the supply functions for milk for a sample of farms in one geographic area are compared using the two approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Seamus J. Sheehy & R. H. McAlexander, 1965. "Selection of Representative Benchmark Farms for Supply Estimation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(3), pages 681-695.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:47:y:1965:i:3:p:681-695.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1236281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vayssières, Jonathan & Vigne, Mathieu & Alary, Véronique & Lecomte, Philippe, 2011. "Integrated participatory modelling of actual farms to support policy making on sustainable intensification," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 146-161, February.
    2. Jansen, Hans G. P. & Stoorvogel, Jetse J., 1998. "Quantification of aggregation bias in regional agricultural land use models: application to Guacimo county, Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 417-439, November.
    3. Finneran, E. & Crosson, p., 2013. "Effects of scale, intensity and farm structure on the income efficiency of Irish beef farms," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 2(4), pages 1-12, July.
    4. McCarl, Bruce A., 1987. "Aggregation Of Heterogeneous Firms," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269919, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Jensen, Harald R., 1977. "PART I. Farm Management and Production Economics, 1946-70," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337213, january.
    6. Flinn, John C., 1969. "The Demand For Irrigation Water In An Intensive Irrigation Area," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Schoney, R. A., 1990. "An Analysis of Wheat Supply Response Under Risk and Uncertainty," Working Papers 244030, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    8. Onal, Hayri & McCarl, Bruce A., 1991. "Aggregation In Mathematical Programming Sector Models And Model Stability," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271241, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. P. C. Abbott & W. E. Tyner & M. J. Roth & G. T. Rafsnider, 1991. "The Economics Of ‐ Wheat Production In Morocco," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 23-32, January.
    10. Feuz, Dillon M. & Skold, Melvin D., 1990. "Typical Farm Theory in Agricultural Research," Economics Staff Papers 232175, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Driver, H.C. & Tran, H.Q. & Lane, S.H, 1978. "A Supply Response Analysis of Industrial Bulk Milk Producers in Southwestern Ontario," Working Papers 245004, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:47:y:1965:i:3:p:681-695.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.