IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v101y2019i1p20-38..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economics of Food Vendors Specialized to Serving the Women, Infants, and Children Program

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick W McLaughlin
  • Tina L Saitone
  • Richard J Sexton

Abstract

This paper focuses on the impacts of food vendors that have emerged primarily or exclusively to redeem benefits for the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program. Federal regulations impose strict requirements on state WIC agencies which authorize vendors that derive more than 50% of their food sales through WIC. Such vendors are commonly known as above-50 or A50 vendors, and most state WIC agencies do not authorize them. Using extensive transactions-level data for the Greater Los Angeles area (GLA), we examine A50 vendors’ performance in the WIC program, including their pricing behavior relative to other WIC vendors in a but-for world where A50 vendors are not authorized. We also conduct econometric tests designed to gauge A50 vendors’ impacts on WIC program access and participation, and costs charged for WIC foods by other program vendors. Results indicate that A50 vendors operating in GLA (a) modestly reduced WIC program food costs relative to a but-for world where they were not authorized, (b) had a modest pro-competitive effect on the pricing behavior of small, non-A50 vendors, which have tended to charge the highest absolute prices for WIC foods in California, (c) caused a modest reduction in participant travel distance (and, hence, transaction costs), and (d) appear to have facilitated participant access. On balance, our results suggest that A50 vendors can improve the food-delivery environment for the WIC program and facilitate participant access to WIC benefits without imposing additional food costs on the program.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick W McLaughlin & Tina L Saitone & Richard J Sexton, 2019. "The Economics of Food Vendors Specialized to Serving the Women, Infants, and Children Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(1), pages 20-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:1:p:20-38.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aay054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McLaughlin, Patrick W. & Saksena, Michelle & Saitone, Tina L. & Ma, Meilin & Volpe, Richard & Wu, Qi & Sexton, Richard J., 2021. "Cost Containment and Participant Access in USDA's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): Evidence from the Greater Los Angeles, CA, Area," USDA Miscellaneous 309614, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Katherine Meckel, 2020. "Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease? Unintended Effects of Payment Reform in a Quantity-Based Transfer Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(6), pages 1821-1865, June.
    3. McLaughlin, Patrick W & Saksena, Michelle & Saitone, Tina L & Ma, Meilin & Volpe, Richard & Wu, Qi & Sexton, Richard J, 2021. "Cost Containment and Participant Access in USDA's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): Evidence from the Greater Los Angeles, CA, Area," Economic Research Report 327202, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Saitone, Tina L & Li, Xuemei & McLaughlin, Patrick W & Sexton, Richard J, 2021. "Cost Implications of Participant Product Selection in USDA’s Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)," Economic Research Report 327184, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Kee, Jennifer & Segovia, Michelle S. & Saboury, Piruz & Palma, Marco A., 2022. "Appealing to generosity to reduce food calorie intake: A natural field experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:1:p:20-38.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.