IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2021i1p308-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Results And Perspectives In Implementing Regional Operational Program

Author

Listed:
  • Ionela Gavrila-Paven

    (1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia, Romania)

Abstract

Increasing the efficiency of structural funds and the rate of absorption is one of the opportunity that Romanian economy has to maximize. The article presents a general analysis on the absorption of Regional Operational Program for the financial programming period 2007-2013. This evolution is being regarded in the context of improving the efficiency of the Regional Operational Program for the present financial programming period 2014- 2020, in order to use the experience accumulated and to increase the absorption rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionela Gavrila-Paven, 2021. "Results And Perspectives In Implementing Regional Operational Program," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 308-316, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:308-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2021/n1/034.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2020. "One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 10-20, January.
    2. Paulo Caldas & Brian Dollery & Rui Cunha Marques, 2018. "European Cohesion Policy impact on development and convergence: a local empirical analysis in Portugal between 2000 and 2014," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1081-1098, June.
    3. Gianluigi Coppola & Sergio Destefanis & Giorgia Marinuzzi & Walter Tortorella, 2020. "European Union and nationally based cohesion policies in the Italian regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 83-94, January.
    4. Davide Fiaschi & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Angela Parenti, 2018. "Does EU cohesion policy work? Theory and evidence," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 386-423, March.
    5. Ramona Pîrvu & Roxana Bădîrcea & Alina Manta & Mihaela Lupăncescu, 2018. "The Effects of the Cohesion Policy on the Sustainable Development of the Development Regions in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Cristian Incaltarau & Gabriela Carmen Pascariu & Neculai‐Cristian Surubaru, 2020. "Evaluating the Determinants of EU Funds Absorption across Old and New Member States – the Role of Administrative Capacity and Political Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 941-961, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eirini Aivazidou & Giovanni Cunico & Edoardo Mollona, 2020. "Beyond the EU Structural Funds’ Absorption Rate: How Do Regions Really Perform?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Paolo Di Caro & Ugo Fratesi, 2022. "One policy, different effects: Estimating the region‐specific impacts of EU cohesion policy," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 307-330, January.
    3. Martina Vukašina & Ines Kersan-Škabiæ & Edvard Orliæ, 2022. "Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU–12 (new member states)," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 857-880, December.
    4. Panagiotis KOUDOUMAKIS & George BOTZORIS & Angelos PROTOPAPAS, 2021. "The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy To The Development And Convergence Of The Regions Of The European Union," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 277-290, June.
    5. Sergio Destefanis & Valter Di Giacinto, 2023. "EU structural funds and GDP per capita: spatial VAR evidence for the European regions," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1409, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    6. Destefanis, Sergio & Rehman, Naqeeb Ur, 2023. "Investment, innovation activities and employment across European regions," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 474-490.
    7. Federico Aresu & Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci, 2023. "Public capital and institutions' quality in the Italian regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1284-1308, November.
    8. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Lewis Dijkstra, 2021. "Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 354-369, February.
    9. Barbara Wieliczko & Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Zbigniew Floriańczyk, 2021. "EU Rural Policy’s Capacity to Facilitate a Just Sustainability Transition of the Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Elena Calegari & Enrico Fabrizi & Gianni Guastella & Francesco Timpano, 2021. "EU regional convergence in the agricultural sector: Are there synergies between agricultural and regional policies?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 23-50, February.
    11. Zoltán Bakucs & Imre Fertő & Zsófia Benedek, 2019. "Success or Waste of Taxpayer Money? Impact Assessment of Rural Development Programs in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Maciej Jagódka & Małgorzata Snarska, 2023. "Should We Continue EU Cohesion Policy? The Dilemma of Uneven Development of Polish Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 901-917, February.
    13. Wanda Biedka & Mikołaj Herbst & Jakub Rok & Piotr Wójcik, 2022. "The local‐level impact of human capital investment within the EU cohesion policy in Poland," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 303-325, April.
    14. Riccardo Crescenzi & Ugo Fratesi & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2020. "Back to the member states? Cohesion Policy and the national challenges to the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 5-9, January.
    15. Peter Mayerhofer & Julia Bachtrögler-Unger & Klaus Nowotny & Gerhard Streicher, 2021. "Ökonomische Wirkung von Interventionen der Europäischen Struktur- und Investitionsfonds in Österreich seit 1995," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(2), pages 139-150, February.
    16. Di Stefano, Roberta & Resce, Giuliano, "undated". "The Determinants of Missed Funding: Predicting the Paradox of Increased Need and Reduced Allocation," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp23092, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    17. Dicharry, Benoit & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Pham, Thi Kim Cuong, 2019. "“The winner takes it all” or a story of the optimal allocation of the European Cohesion Fund," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 385-399.
    18. Cezar TECLEAN & Gabriela DRAGAN, 2023. "Consultative Dimension In The European Union'S Multi-Level Governance Process: A Lever For Regulatory And Institutional Resilience," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(1), pages 48-57, April.
    19. Fusaro, Stefano & Scandurra, Rosario, 2023. "The impact of the European social fund on youth education and employment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Augusto Cerqua & Guido Pellegrini, 2023. "I will survive! The impact of place-based policies when public transfers fade out," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1605-1618, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional Operational Program; structural funds; economic performance; regional development strategies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • P17 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Performance and Prospects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:308-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.