IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2020i1p575-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Exchange Of Information Between Competitors And The Antitrust Rules

Author

Listed:
  • SCURT Ciprian

    (Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The exchange of information between market competitors has been analyzed from multiple economic perspectives. Taking into account the competition policy and its antitrust rules it is important that the exchange is evaluated exactly by the people who participate in discussions and meetings, because there is a real danger that the exchange of economic information might turn into a cartel. Thus, companies represented at meetings where such discussions take place are exposed to serious sanctions from the competition authorities, which can affect not only their commercial reputation but also the solidity of their market position. Cartels represent illegal agreements between undertakings and are one of the most pernicious anti-competitive practices, being targeted by competition authorities around the world. They create allocation inefficiency and reduce companies’ incentives to provide new or better products and services at competitive prices. The companies involved in a cartel are sanctioned in all European jurisdictions with fines up to 10% of their turnovers. The information exchanged may consist in future prices or future quantities, individual data about costs and demand, statistical data, aggregated data. The analysis of the competition risks over the collusive potential of information exchanged has to be done on a case by case basis and the undertakings should take into account factors like the market’s concentration degree, the elasticity of the demand on the market, the age of information exchanged, the public/non-public character of the data and the frequency of the information exchange. Sometimes it is difficult to draw a clear line between the legitimate exchanges of information on the market and the illegitimate exchanges. This paper analyzes the good practices in the field, as well as concrete examples of information exchanges to be avoided by companies, based on the enforcement activities of the European Commission and of the Romanian Competition Authority. The impact of COVID-19 outbreak over the antitrust rules on exchange of information is tackled in the paper as well, as unprecedented approaches are put into practice by the European Commission. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for the business environment, presenting the do’s and don’ts framework in a concise manner. Compliance with the antitrust rules regarding the exchange of information is a need for most of the undertakings, regardless of size, especially for those that are part of trade associations and / or professional organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • SCURT Ciprian, 2020. "The Exchange Of Information Between Competitors And The Antitrust Rules," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 575-585, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:575-585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2020/n1/057.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papadopoulos,Anestis S., 2010. "The International Dimension of EU Competition Law and Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521196468.
    2. Berinde Mihai, 2008. "Cartels – Between Theory, Leniency Policy And Fines," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 549-552, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marvão, Catarina, 2014. "Heterogeneous Penalties and Private Information," Konkurrensverket Working Paper Series in Law and Economics 2014:1, Konkurrensverket (Swedish Competition Authority).
    2. Mateusz Blachucki, 2012. "Internationalization of merger control," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(1), pages 137-154, March.
    3. Catarina Marvão, 2016. "The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Samà, Danilo, 2014. "Essays on economic analysis of competition law: theory and practice," MPRA Paper 103118, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Nezaj, Novitet Xh., 2015. "The development of competition law in Kosovo," Discussion Papers 6/15, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    6. Murray Petrie, 2016. "Jurisdictional integration: A framework for measuring and predicting the depth of international regulatory cooperation in competition policy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 75-92, March.
    7. Beatrice Berna, 2013. "Human Dignity - A Heuristic Discipline Of Human Rights," Contemporary Legal Institutions, Romanian-American University, vol. 5(1), pages 209-216, December.
    8. Marvao, Catarina, 2014. "Heterogeneous Penalties and Private Information," SITE Working Paper Series 29, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics.
    9. SCURT Ciprian, 2020. "The Competition Policy Framework For Excessive Pricing," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 381-389, December.
    10. repec:cpn:umkeip:2012:v1:p:137-154 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Samà, Danilo, 2013. "The Effectiveness of Competition Policy: An Econometric Assessment in Developed and Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 55360, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Catarina Marvão, 2016. "The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-27, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    exchange of information; competition; antitrust; cartel; compliance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:575-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.