IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlcfr/104.00000033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Nature of Institutional Stock Investing

Author

Listed:
  • Blume, Marshall E.
  • Keim, Donald B.

Abstract

We document that institutional investors, particularly hedge funds, decreased their holdings of larger stocks from 1980 to 2010 and increased their holdings of smaller stocks. Since 1990 institutions have underweighted, relative to market weights, those stocks that make up the largest 40 percent of the value of the market, and since 2006 have overweighted the stocks that make up the smallest 20 percent of the market. The contrary findings in the literature that institutions overweight larger stocks and underweight smaller stocks (e.g., Gompers and Metrick (2001) and Bennett et al. (2003)) are due to the use of a linear relation between institutional ownership and the logarithm of market value. In fact, we show that this relation is nonlinear and resembles an inverted U. We discuss three factors that may have contributed to these changes in institutional holdings: better understanding of diversification; growing awareness of the small stock premium; and less efficient pricing of smaller stocks relative to larger stocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Blume, Marshall E. & Keim, Donald B., 2017. "The Changing Nature of Institutional Stock Investing," Critical Finance Review, now publishers, vol. 7(1), pages 1-41, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000033
    DOI: 10.1561/104.00000033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000033
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/104.00000033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Pombo & Cristian Pinto-Gutierrez & Mauricio Jara-Betín, 2022. "Multiple large shareholder coalitions, institutional ownership and investment decisions: Evidence from cross-border deals in Latin America," Documentos CEDE 20333, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    2. Borochin, Paul & Yang, Jie, 2017. "The effects of institutional investor objectives on firm valuation and governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 171-199.
    3. Olena Onishchenko & Numan Ülkü, 2022. "Investor types' trading around the short‐term reversal pattern," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2627-2647, April.
    4. Bing Guo & Dennis C. Hutschenreiter & David Pérez-Castrillo & Anna Toldrà-Simats, 2023. "Institutional Blockholders and Corporate Innovation," Working Papers 1390, Barcelona School of Economics.
    5. Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Turtle, Harry & Walker, Thomas & Wang, Jun, 2017. "Litigation risk and institutional monitoring," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 342-359.
    6. Ülkü, Numan & Rogers, Madeline, 2018. "Who drives the Monday effect?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 46-65.
    7. Anand M. Vijh & Jiawei (Brooke) Wang, 2022. "Negative returns on addition to the S&P 500 index and positive returns on deletion? New evidence on the attractiveness of S&P 500 versus S&P 400 indexes," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(4), pages 1127-1164, December.
    8. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2020. "Fund tradeoffs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 614-634.
    9. Cline, Brandon N. & Fu, Xudong & Tang, Tian, 2020. "Shareholder investment horizons and bank debt financing," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Lou, Dong & Polk, Christopher & Skouras, Spyros, 2019. "A tug of war: Overnight versus intraday expected returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 192-213.
    11. Paul Calluzzo & Fabio Moneta & Selim Topaloglu, 2019. "When Anomalies Are Publicized Broadly, Do Institutions Trade Accordingly?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4555-4574, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutional investors; Institutional stock ownership; SEC 13F filings; Hedge funds; Gfficient pricing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.