IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2023i61p203-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacious methods of restraining COVID-19 through behavioral public policy

Author

Listed:
  • Upravitelev, A.

    (European University Institute, Italy)

Abstract

Discussions about the degree of state influence on the economy have always had a special place in economics, but the COVID-19 pandemic created a new round of the old dispute. States took unprecedented measures to contain the spread of the disease, changing many of everyday life practices of the citizens. These methods, despite their effectiveness, had significant drawbacks. The concept of libertarian paternalism by R. Thaler and C. Sunstein, based on the achievements of behavioral economics, offers new methods of state intervention in the private life of citizens. The methods of libertarian paternalism aimed at containing COVID-19 were experimentally proven to be effective. In our work, we point out the weaknesses of traditional methods of containing the spread of the disease, demonstrate directions for behavioral interventions, and review methods that experimentally proved effective. Thus, the most important problem, in our opinion, is the spread of conspiracy theories and disinformation, and the most promising areas through which behavioral changes can be carried out are: social context, leadership, threat perception, overcoming fear, scientific communication, personal and collective interests. This text can be useful not only to theorists of behavioral economics and public policy, but also to practitioners of public administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Upravitelev, A., 2023. "Efficacious methods of restraining COVID-19 through behavioral public policy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 203-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2023:i:61:p:203-222
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_4_203-222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2023-61-203-222r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_203-222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sasaki, Shusaku & Saito, Tomoya & Ohtake, Fumio, 2022. "Nudges for COVID-19 voluntary vaccination: How to explain peer information?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Carl Bonander & Mats Ekman & Niklas Jakobsson, 2022. "Vaccination nudges: A study of pre-booked COVID-19 vaccinations in Sweden," Papers 2202.04931, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    3. Allcott, Hunt & Boxell, Levi & Conway, Jacob & Gentzkow, Matthew & Thaler, Michael & Yang, David, 2020. "Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Marcella Alsan & Marianne Wanamaker, 2018. "Tuskegee and the Health of Black Men," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 407-455.
    5. Romer, Daniel & Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, 2020. "Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. Gudkov, L., 2022. "Inertia of state paternalism and its consequences," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 57(5), pages 153-161.
    7. R. Kapeliushnikov., 2013. "Behavioral Economics and New Paternalism. Part I," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 9.
    8. Lunn, Peter D. & Timmons, Shane & Belton, Cameron A. & Barjaková, Martina & Julienne, Hannah & Lavin, Ciarán, 2020. "Motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2021. "The proper role of government in the market economy: The case of the post-COVID recovery," Journal of Government and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(C).
    10. Chen, Chao & Feng, Tao & Gu, Xiaoning & Yao, Baozhen, 2022. "Investigating the effectiveness of COVID-19 pandemic countermeasures on the use of public transport: A case study of The Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 98-107.
    11. Jay J. Van Bavel & Katherine Baicker & Paulo S. Boggio & Valerio Capraro & Aleksandra Cichocka & Mina Cikara & Molly J. Crockett & Alia J. Crum & Karen M. Douglas & James N. Druckman & John Drury & Oe, 2020. "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 460-471, May.
    12. Garcia, Thomas & Massoni, Sébastien & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2020. "Ambiguity and excuse-driven behavior in charitable giving," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. James N. Druckman & Mary C. McGrath, 2019. "The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(2), pages 111-119, February.
    14. Rubinstein, A. & Greenberg, R. & Gorodetsky, A., 2022. "A paternalistic state and civil society," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 57(5), pages 142-148.
    15. Bonander, Carl & Ekman, Mats & Jakobsson, Niklas, 2022. "Vaccination nudges: A study of pre-booked COVID-19 vaccinations in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    16. Nina Haug & Lukas Geyrhofer & Alessandro Londei & Elma Dervic & Amélie Desvars-Larrive & Vittorio Loreto & Beate Pinior & Stefan Thurner & Peter Klimek, 2020. "Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1303-1312, December.
    17. Ewen Gallic & Michel Lubrano & Pierre Michel, 2022. "Optimal lockdowns for COVID‐19 pandemics: Analyzing the efficiency of sanitary policies in Europe," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(5), pages 944-967, October.
    18. Katherine L. Milkman & Linnea Gandhi & Sean F. Ellis & Heather N. Graci & Dena M. Gromet & Rayyan S. Mobarak & Alison M. Buttenheim & Angela L. Duckworth & Devin Pope & Ala Stanford & Richard Thaler &, 2022. "A citywide experiment testing the impact of geographically targeted, high-pay-off vaccine lotteries," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1515-1524, November.
    19. S. Bourdin & S.B. Miled & J. Salhi, 2022. "The Drivers of Policies to Limit the Spread of COVID-19 in Europe," Post-Print hal-04445036, HAL.
    20. Robert Böhm & Cornelia Betsch & Yana Litovsky & Philipp Sprengholz & Noel T. Brewer & Gretchen Chapman & Julie Leask & George Leowenstein & Martha Scherzer & Cass R. Sunstein & Michael Kirchler, 2022. "Crowdsourcing interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines," Working Papers 2022-03, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    21. Paton, Calum, 2022. "World-beating? Testing Britain's Covid response and tracing the explanation," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 238-245, April.
    22. Sebastien Bourdin & Slimane Ben Miled & Jamil Salhi, 2022. "The Drivers of Policies to Limit the Spread of COVID-19 in Europe," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-9, February.
    23. R. Kapeliushnikov, 2013. "Behavioral Economics and New Paternalism (Part II)," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    24. Daniel M. Hausman, 2022. "Austrian Economics and the New Paternalism," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Contemporary Methods and Austrian Economics, volume 26, pages 1-16, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    25. Robert M. Bond & Christopher J. Fariss & Jason J. Jones & Adam D. I. Kramer & Cameron Marlow & Jaime E. Settle & James H. Fowler, 2012. "A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 295-298, September.
    26. Hengchen Dai & Silvia Saccardo & Maria A. Han & Lily Roh & Naveen Raja & Sitaram Vangala & Hardikkumar Modi & Shital Pandya & Michael Sloyan & Daniel M. Croymans, 2021. "Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations," Nature, Nature, vol. 597(7876), pages 404-409, September.
    27. R. Kapeliushnikov, 2013. "Behavioral Economics and New Paternalism. (Part I)," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jay J. Van Bavel & Katherine Baicker & Paulo S. Boggio & Valerio Capraro & Aleksandra Cichocka & Mina Cikara & Molly J. Crockett & Alia J. Crum & Karen M. Douglas & James N. Druckman & John Drury & Oe, 2020. "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 460-471, May.
    2. Carl Bonander & Mats Ekman & Niklas Jakobsson, 2023. "When do Default Nudges Work?," Papers 2301.08797, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    3. Bazzi, Samuel & Fiszbein, Martin & Gebresilasse, Mesay, 2021. "“Rugged individualism” and collective (in)action during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Phu Nguyen Van & Thierry Blayac & Dimitri Dubois & Sebastien Duchene & Marc Willinger & Bruno Ventelou, 2021. "Designing acceptable anti-COVID-19 policies by taking into account individuals’ preferences: evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-33, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    5. Bonander, Carl & Ekman, Mats & Jakobsson, Niklas, 2022. "Vaccination nudges: A study of pre-booked COVID-19 vaccinations in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    6. Susan Athey & Kristen Grabarz & Michael Luca & Nils Wernerfelt, 2023. "Digital public health interventions at scale: The impact of social media advertising on beliefs and outcomes related to COVID vaccines," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120(5), pages 2208110120-, January.
    7. William Clyde & Andreas Kakolyris & Georgios Koimisis, 2021. "A Study of the Effectiveness of Governmental Strategies for Managing Mortality from COVID-19," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(4), pages 487-505, October.
    8. Amy M. Wolaver & John A. Doces, 2021. "The impact of COVID‐19 and political identification on framing bias in an infectious disease experiment: The frame reigns supreme," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2459-2471, November.
    9. Momsen, Katharina & Ohndorf, Markus, 2023. "Information avoidance: Self-image concerns, inattention, and ideology," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 386-400.
    10. Floyd Jiuyun Zhang, 2023. "Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise during COVID-19," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 696-706, May.
    11. Golnaz Baradaran Motie & Christopher Biolsi, 2021. "County‐Level Determinants Of Social Distancing (Or Lack Thereof) During The Covid‐19 Pandemic," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 264-279, April.
    12. Wei Zhai & Xinyu Fu & Mengyang Liu & Zhong-Ren Peng, 2023. "The impact of ethnic segregation on neighbourhood-level social distancing in the United States amid the early outbreak of COVID-19," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(8), pages 1403-1426, June.
    13. Grimalda, Gianluca & Murtin, Fabrice & Pipke, David & Putterman, Louis & Sutter, Matthias, 2023. "The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Blayac, Thierry & Dubois, Dimitri & Duchêne, Sébastien & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Ventelou, Bruno & Willinger, Marc, 2022. "What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Lin, Tian & Harris, Elizabeth A. & Heemskerk, Amber & Van Bavel, Jay J. & Ebner, Natalie C., 2021. "A multi-national test on self-reported compliance with COVID-19 public health measures: The role of individual age and gender demographics and countries’ developmental status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    16. Susan Athey & Kristen Grabarz & Michael Luca & Nils Wernerfelt, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Digital Interventions on COVID-19 Attitudes and Beliefs," Papers 2206.10214, arXiv.org.
    17. Jay J. Van Bavel, 2022. "National Identity Predicts Public Health Support During A Global Pandemic," HKUST IEMS Working Paper Series 2022-81, HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies, revised Jul 2022.
    18. Block, Ray & Burnham, Michael & Kahn, Kayla & Peng, Rachel & Seeman, Jeremy & Seto, Christopher, 2022. "Perceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    19. Aksoy, Ozan, 2022. "It runs in the family: parental influence on adolescents’ compliance with social distancing measures during Covid-19 lockdowns," SocArXiv y7wc6, Center for Open Science.
    20. Islam, Asad & Kusnadi, Gita & Rezki, Jahen & Sim, Armand & van Empel, Giovanni & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Zenou, Yves, 2023. "Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy Using Local Ambassadors: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Indonesia," IZA Discussion Papers 15899, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    libertarian paternalism; behavioral public policy; Covid-19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2023:i:61:p:203-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.