IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nax/conyad/v58y2013i3p279-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Escuelas de negocios latinoamericanas. Un análisis empírico

Author

Listed:
  • Gantman Ernesto R.

    (Universidad de Buenos Aires)

Abstract

Este trabajo utiliza datos de 2009 a 2011 sobre una muestra de escuelas de negocios de América Latina con el objetivo de identificar los determinantes organizacionales del éxito de los graduados de tales escuelas. Para ello la metodología empleada es un análisis de regresión múltiple de datos de panel con efectos aleatorios. Los resultados indican que el nivel de producción académica de las escuelas, el cual se obtuvo del número de artículos en publicaciones indexadas en el Social Science Citation Index, está asociado en forma positiva y estadísticamente significativa con el éxito de sus egresados. Además, la calidad de la planta docente también tiene un efecto positivo y significativo sobre dicha variable, aunque este último hallazgo no es robusto de acuerdo con las distintas especificaciones de los modelos de regresión.

Suggested Citation

  • Gantman Ernesto R., 2013. "Escuelas de negocios latinoamericanas. Un análisis empírico," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(3), pages 279-298, julio-sep.
    • Handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:58:y:2013:i:3:p:279-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cya.unam.mx/index.php/cya/article/view/133
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rivera-Camino, Jaime & Mejia, Luis Gomez, 2006. "Management education in Ibero-America: An exploratory analysis and perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 205-220, September.
    2. Linda Wedlin, 2006. "Ranking Business Schools," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3941.
    3. Engwall, Lars, 2007. "The anatomy of management education," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-35, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertrand Guillotin & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Internationalization strategies of business schools - how flat is the world?," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01265950, HAL.
    2. Luis Antonio Orozco Castro, 2015. "Diversidad y heterogeneidad en redes de colaboración científica. Un estudio de las escuelas de administración de América Latina," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Administración de Empresas, edition 1, number 44, August.
    3. Bertrand Guillotin & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Internationalization strategies of business schools - how flat is the world?," Post-Print hal-01265950, HAL.
    4. María José Quinteros & Rafael Sánchez & Mauricio G. Villena, 2020. "How do business schools compete in Latin America? Stability and best predictors of success for the AmericaEconomia MBA Ranking," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(50), pages 5546-5563, October.
    5. John E. Cicala & Natasha Delcoure & Barbara R. Oates, 2017. "Does Benchmarking Hinder Mission Diversity Of Aacsb-Accredited Schools: Evidence From The U.S. And Europe," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14.
    6. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    7. Zhan, Ge, 2013. "Statistical power in international business research: Study levels and data types," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 678-686.
    8. Hemant Merchant & Ajai Gaur, 2008. "Opening the ‘Non-Manufacturing’ envelope: The next big enterprise for international business research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 379-396, April.
    9. Humphrey, Christopher & Gendron, Yves, 2015. "What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-66.
    10. Fernández Rodríguez, Carlos J., 2015. "Piquenique em um rio congelado: desafios para estudos genuínos em management na Espanha," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 55(2), March.
    11. Kathleen Rodenburg & Taimoor Rizwan & Ruifeng Liu & Julia Christensen Hughes, 2021. "Enhancing the Positive Impact Rating: A New Business School Rating in Support of a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Martin Kornberger & Chris Carter, 2010. "Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 325-349, March.
    13. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2011. "From the Rule of Law to the Law of Rules," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01891972, HAL.
    14. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.
    15. Kantola, Anu & Seeck, Hannele, 2011. "Dissemination of management into politics: Michael Porter and the political uses of management consulting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49805, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Alex Stewart, 2022. "Who shuns entrepreneurship journals? Why? And what should we do about it?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 2043-2060, April.
    17. Anita Doraisami & Alex Millmow, 2016. "Funding Australian economics research: Local benefits?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(4), pages 511-524, December.
    18. Yves Gendron, 2008. "Constituting the Academic Performer: The Spectre of Superficiality and Stagnation in Academia," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 97-127.
    19. Syed Haider Khalil & Fahad Sultan & Muhammad Tufail, 2018. "Constructing Symbolic Value Through Categorization Tools: The Role of Rankings in Building Business School's Reputation," Global Social Sciences Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(3), pages 354-377, September.
    20. Marc Correa & Lucinio González-Sabaté & Ignacio Serrano, 2013. "Home bias effect in the management literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 417-433, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:58:y:2013:i:3:p:279-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto García-Narvaez (Technical Editor) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcunamx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.