IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-34857-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretable and tractable models of transcriptional noise for the rational design of single-molecule quantification experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Gennady Gorin

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • John J. Vastola

    (Harvard Medical School)

  • Meichen Fang

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Lior Pachter

    (California Institute of Technology
    California Institute of Technology)

Abstract

The question of how cell-to-cell differences in transcription rate affect RNA count distributions is fundamental for understanding biological processes underlying transcription. Answering this question requires quantitative models that are both interpretable (describing concrete biophysical phenomena) and tractable (amenable to mathematical analysis). This enables the identification of experiments which best discriminate between competing hypotheses. As a proof of principle, we introduce a simple but flexible class of models involving a continuous stochastic transcription rate driving a discrete RNA transcription and splicing process, and compare and contrast two biologically plausible hypotheses about transcription rate variation. One assumes variation is due to DNA experiencing mechanical strain, while the other assumes it is due to regulator number fluctuations. We introduce a framework for numerically and analytically studying such models, and apply Bayesian model selection to identify candidate genes that show signatures of each model in single-cell transcriptomic data from mouse glutamatergic neurons.

Suggested Citation

  • Gennady Gorin & John J. Vastola & Meichen Fang & Lior Pachter, 2022. "Interpretable and tractable models of transcriptional noise for the rational design of single-molecule quantification experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-34857-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34857-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-34857-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-34857-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Silk & Paul D W Kirk & Chris P Barnes & Tina Toni & Michael P H Stumpf, 2014. "Model Selection in Systems Biology Depends on Experimental Design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Junyue Cao & Malte Spielmann & Xiaojie Qiu & Xingfan Huang & Daniel M. Ibrahim & Andrew J. Hill & Fan Zhang & Stefan Mundlos & Lena Christiansen & Frank J. Steemers & Cole Trapnell & Jay Shendure, 2019. "The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 566(7745), pages 496-502, February.
    3. Zizhen Yao & Hanqing Liu & Fangming Xie & Stephan Fischer & Ricky S. Adkins & Andrew I. Aldridge & Seth A. Ament & Anna Bartlett & M. Margarita Behrens & Koen Berge & Darren Bertagnolli & Hector Roux , 2021. "A transcriptomic and epigenomic cell atlas of the mouse primary motor cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 598(7879), pages 103-110, October.
    4. Christoph Zechner & Heinz Koeppl, 2014. "Uncoupled Analysis of Stochastic Reaction Networks in Fluctuating Environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Brown, Stephen J & Dybvig, Philip H, 1986. "The Empirical Implications of the Cox, Ingersoll, Ross Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(3), pages 617-630, July.
    6. Zachary R Fox & Brian Munsky, 2019. "The finite state projection based Fisher information matrix approach to estimate information and optimize single-cell experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Gioele La Manno & Ruslan Soldatov & Amit Zeisel & Emelie Braun & Hannah Hochgerner & Viktor Petukhov & Katja Lidschreiber & Maria E. Kastriti & Peter Lönnerberg & Alessandro Furlan & Jean Fan & Lars E, 2018. "RNA velocity of single cells," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7719), pages 494-498, August.
    8. Zachary R. Fox & Gregor Neuert & Brian Munsky, 2020. "Optimal Design of Single-Cell Experiments within Temporally Fluctuating Environments," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, June.
    9. Ole E. Barndorff‐Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2003. "Integrated OU Processes and Non‐Gaussian OU‐based Stochastic Volatility Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 30(2), pages 277-295, June.
    10. Ole E. Barndorff‐Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2001. "Non‐Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck‐based models and some of their uses in financial economics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 167-241.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taufer, Emanuele & Leonenko, Nikolai, 2009. "Simulation of Lvy-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes with given marginal distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 2427-2437, April.
    2. Dassios, Angelos & Qu, Yan & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2018. "Exact simulation for a class of tempered stable," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86981, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Piotr Szczepocki, 2020. "Application of iterated filtering to stochastic volatility models based on non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(2), pages 173-187, June.
    4. Shu, Yin & Feng, Qianmei & Liu, Hao, 2019. "Using degradation-with-jump measures to estimate life characteristics of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Masuda, H. & Yoshida, N., 2005. "Asymptotic expansion for Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard's stochastic volatility model," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 115(7), pages 1167-1186, July.
    6. Creal, Drew D., 2008. "Analysis of filtering and smoothing algorithms for Lévy-driven stochastic volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 2863-2876, February.
    7. Anzarut, Michelle & Mena, Ramsés H., 2019. "A Harris process to model stochastic volatility," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 151-169.
    8. Gaofei Li & Yicong Sun & Immanuel Kwok & Liting Yang & Wanying Wen & Peixian Huang & Mei Wu & Jing Li & Zhibin Huang & Zhaoyuan Liu & Shuai He & Wan Peng & Jin-Xin Bei & Florent Ginhoux & Lai Guan Ng , 2024. "Cebp1 and Cebpβ transcriptional axis controls eosinophilopoiesis in zebrafish," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Piergiacomo Sabino & Nicola Cufaro Petroni, 2022. "Fast simulation of tempered stable Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2517-2551, November.
    10. Shaliastovich, Ivan & Tauchen, George, 2011. "Pricing of the time-change risks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 843-858, June.
    11. Rong Li & Tianyuan Wang & Ryan M. Marquardt & John P. Lydon & San-Pin Wu & Francesco J. DeMayo, 2023. "TRIM28 modulates nuclear receptor signaling to regulate uterine function," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Zhixin Li & Kathy Nga-Chu Lui & Sin-Ting Lau & Frank Pui-Ling Lai & Peng Li & Patrick Ho-Yu Chung & Kenneth Kak-Yuen Wong & Paul Kwong-Hing Tam & Maria-Mercedes Garica-Barcelo & Chi-Chung Hui & Pak Ch, 2023. "Transcriptomics of Hirschsprung disease patient-derived enteric neural crest cells reveals a role for oxidative phosphorylation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Michael S. Balzer & Tomohito Doke & Ya-Wen Yang & Daniel L. Aldridge & Hailong Hu & Hung Mai & Dhanunjay Mukhi & Ziyuan Ma & Rojesh Shrestha & Matthew B. Palmer & Christopher A. Hunter & Katalin Suszt, 2022. "Single-cell analysis highlights differences in druggable pathways underlying adaptive or fibrotic kidney regeneration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Semere Habtemicael & Musie Ghebremichael & Indranil SenGupta, 2019. "Volatility and Variance Swap Using Superposition of the Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard type Lévy Processes," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(1), pages 75-92, June.
    15. Aubain Hilaire Nzokem, 2023. "Pricing European Options under Stochastic Volatility Models: Case of Five-Parameter Variance-Gamma Process," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, January.
    16. P. Brockwell, 2014. "Recent results in the theory and applications of CARMA processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(4), pages 647-685, August.
    17. Stojanović, Vladica S. & Popović, Biljana Č. & Milovanović, Gradimir V., 2016. "The Split-SV model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 560-581.
    18. Nicola Cufaro Petroni & Piergiacomo Sabino, 2020. "Tempered stable distributions and finite variation Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes," Papers 2011.09147, arXiv.org.
    19. Raknerud, Arvid & Skare, Øivind, 2012. "Indirect inference methods for stochastic volatility models based on non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3260-3275.
    20. Mattia Zaghi & Federica Banfi & Luca Massimino & Monica Volpin & Edoardo Bellini & Simone Brusco & Ivan Merelli & Cristiana Barone & Michela Bruni & Linda Bossini & Luigi Antonio Lamparelli & Laura Pi, 2023. "Balanced SET levels favor the correct enhancer repertoire during cell fate acquisition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-34857-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.