IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jas888/v8y2020i3p601-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Body Temperature and Reproductive Performance of Beef Heifers Supplemented With Rumen-Protected Methionine

Author

Listed:
  • José Henrique Dominguez
  • Matheus Gomes lopes
  • Fabrício Amadori Machado
  • Ederson dos Santos
  • Fernanda Lopes
  • Josiane de Oliveira Feijó
  • Cássio Cassal Brauner
  • Viviane Rohrig Rabassa
  • Marcio Nunes Corrêa
  • Francisco Augusto Burkert Del Pino
  • Eduardo Schmitt

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the reproductive performance and body temperature of beef heifers supplemented with rumen-protected methionine (RPM) in an extensive grazing system and mated during the summer. One hundred 5/8 Angus 3/8 Brahman heifers were homogeneously divided into the control group (n=48, CG) supplemented with mineral salt ad libitum and methionine group (n=52, MG) who received the same supplementation plus 4 g of methionine per 100 g of mineral salt. The groups were fixed-time artificial inseminated (FTAI) 45 days after starting the supplementation. On day 0 of the FTAI protocol, ten animals per group received data-logger thermometers attached in progesterone implants recording the body temperature of the animals every 30 minutes. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed on days 30 and 60 after the artificial insemination to determine the rates of conception, pregnancy, and pregnancy loss. At the beginning of the supplementation, both groups had similar weights (MG was 304.6 kg and CG 304.4 kg), while on days 0 and 30 about the FTAI protocol, the MG was higher weight (365.9 vs. 346.7 and 384.8 vs. 371.5 Kg). During the FTAI protocol, the MG had lower body temperatures (38.77 vs. 38.99 °C) and a tendency to have larger dominant follicles than the CG (11.76 mm x 10.8 mm). Although it did not impact reproductive performance, the observed higher weight, dominant follicle sizes, and lower body temperatures during FTAI protocols show the potential benefits of methionine supplementation in beef heifers mated during the summer.

Suggested Citation

  • José Henrique Dominguez & Matheus Gomes lopes & Fabrício Amadori Machado & Ederson dos Santos & Fernanda Lopes & Josiane de Oliveira Feijó & Cássio Cassal Brauner & Viviane Rohrig Rabassa & Marcio, 2020. "Body Temperature and Reproductive Performance of Beef Heifers Supplemented With Rumen-Protected Methionine," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 601-615, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:601-615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/16793/13120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/16793
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Key, Nigel D. & Sneeringer, Stacy & Marquardt, David, 2014. "Climate Change, Heat Stress, and U.S. Dairy Production," Economic Research Report 186731, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean L. Steiner & David D. Briske & David P. Brown & Caitlin M. Rottler, 2018. "Vulnerability of Southern Plains agriculture to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 201-218, January.
    2. Hutchins, Jared P. & Nolan, Derek & Skidmore, Marin, 2023. "Extreme Heat and Livestock Production: Costs and Adaptation in the US Dairy Sector," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335579, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Neumann James E. & Strzepek Kenneth, 2014. "State of the literature on the economic impacts of climate change in the United States," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 411-443, December.
    4. Laura C. Bowling & Keith A. Cherkauer & Charlotte I. Lee & Janna L. Beckerman & Sylvie Brouder & Jonathan R. Buzan & Otto C. Doering & Jeffrey S. Dukes & Paul D. Ebner & Jane R. Frankenberger & Benjam, 2020. "Agricultural impacts of climate change in Indiana and potential adaptations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 2005-2027, December.
    5. Tatyana Deryugina & Solomon M. Hsiang, 2014. "Does the Environment Still Matter? Daily Temperature and Income in the United States," NBER Working Papers 20750, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Veltman, Karin & Rotz, C. Alan & Chase, Larry & Cooper, Joyce & Forest, Chris E. & Ingraham, Peter A. & Izaurralde, R. César & Jones, Curtis D. & Nicholas, Robert E. & Ruark, Matthew D. & Salas, Willi, 2021. "Assessing and reducing the environmental impact of dairy production systems in the northern US in a changing climate," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Njuki, Eric, 2022. "Sources, Trends, and Drivers of U.S. Dairy Productivity and Efficiency," USDA Miscellaneous 323860, United States Department of Agriculture.
    8. Denis Nadolnyak & Valentina Hartarska & Bretford Griffin, 2019. "The Impacts of Economic, Demographic, and Weather Factors on the Exit of Beginning Farmers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Tugba Gurler & Theo Elmer & Yuanlong Cui & Siddig Omer & Saffa Riffat, 2018. "Experimental investigation of a novel PVt/heat pump system for energy-efficient poultry houses," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 404-413.
    10. Yousefi-Sahzabi, Amin & Unlu-Yucesoy, Eda & Sasaki, Kyuro & Yuosefi, Hossein & Widiatmojo, Arif & Sugai, Yuichi, 2017. "Turkish challenges for low-carbon society: Current status, government policies and social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 596-608.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:601-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.