Adam Smith was not a single-minded advocate of a laissez-faire market in which the minimal State had no more than a protective function. Rather, he was a pragmatic social thinker who in each case selected the tool that was the best suited to his meta-objective of rapid economic growth. Contrasting Smith with Murray Rothbard, the paper shows that Smith was a cautious interventionist even as he was a guarded libertarian. The discussion - besides an introduction - is divided into five sections dealing, respectively, with market efficiency, government failure, the protective State, the productive State and public finance.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Wolpert).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith) P10 - Economic Systems - - Capitalist Systems - - - General
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)