IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v14y2019i4p271-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Institutional Foundation for the Knowledge Economy in Central and East European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Matjaz Nahtigal

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

  • Isaac Stanley

    (NESTA, United Kingdom)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to provide an institutional framework – economic, legal, regulatory, educational – for the Central and East European countries aspiring to reach the levels of inclusive knowledge of economy and society known in some of the most developed regions in the world. The challenge to reach such a level of development is twofold. Even in the most developed parts of the world a growing gap can be observed between the technologically, organizationally and financially advanced firms and the rest of the economy. A strong concentration of knowledge, technologies, and organization of advanced production is taking place in only a handful of leading regions. The rest of the economy and society remains organized in traditional economic, social and managerial practices. The challenge for the policy-makers in these advanced economies and societies is how to disseminate these advanced practices to the excluded sectors of the economy and society. As shown by a recent NESTA report on knowledge economy, such a restructuring would require a major shift in institutional organization of the market economy. Strengthening of competition policy, improvements in technological policies, decentralized strategic partnership between the public and private sectors, and institutional innovations in ownership structures are necessary elements in spreading the benefits of the knowledge economy to the overall economy and society. From the perspective of developing countries, including the current and prospective eu members in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe, the task in front of the policy-makers is even more challenging: how to overcome the development gap between the developed and developing countries; how to overcome the path dependency; and how to establish an inclusive modern knowledge economy and society. Only high-quality public institutions, an accountable and proactive public sector, strategic decentralized coordination between the public and private sectors, and institutional imagination can lead to such a path of inclusive development. The probability of climbing from the (semi) periphery appears increasingly low after several decades of missed opportunities during the period of transition, but the stakes are high. Only the successful institutional, economic and social restructuring of developing countries can lead toward a more balanced, more sustainable and more diverse development of the world economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Matjaz Nahtigal & Isaac Stanley, 2019. "An Institutional Foundation for the Knowledge Economy in Central and East European Countries," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 14(4), pages 271-287.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:14:y:2019:i:4:p:271-287
    DOI: 10.26493/1854-4231.14.272-287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/1854-4231/14.271-287.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26493/1854-4231.14.272-287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1), pages 101-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajah Rasiah, 2005. "Trade-related Investment Liberalization under the WTO: The Malaysian Experience," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 453-471.
    2. Roberto Martino & Phu Nguyen-Van, 2014. "Labour market regulation and fiscal parameters: A structural model for European regions," Working Papers of BETA 2014-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Alice N. Sindzingre, 2015. "Whatever Inconsistencies and Effects? Explaining the Resilience of the Policy Reforms Applied to Developing Countries," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 159-178, August.
    4. Fine, Ben, 2002. "Economics Imperialism and the New Development Economics as Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2057-2070, December.
    5. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    6. Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, 2005. "Coordination Failure, Clusters, and Microeconomic Interventions," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2005), pages 1-41, August.
    7. Philippe DULBECCO, 2000. "The Dynamics of the Institutional Change and the Market Economy: An Austrian Analysis," Working Papers 200010, CERDI.
    8. François Combarnous, 2003. "Le développement de l'humain comme préalable au développement économique : l'apport de l'analyse en composantes principales," Documents de travail 84, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    9. Reinhardt, Nola & Peres, Wilson, 2000. "Latin America's New Economic Model: Micro Responses and Economic Restructuring," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1543-1566, September.
    10. Colin Crouch, 2007. "Neoinstitutionalism: Still no intellectual hegemony?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 261-270, September.
    11. Guanghua Wan & Ming Lu & Zhao Chen, 2004. "Globalization and Regional Income Inequality: Evidence from within China," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2004-10, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Julia Cage, 2015. "Measuring Policy Performance: Can We Do Better than the World Bank?," Post-Print hal-03392964, HAL.
    13. Deepak Nayyar, 2006. "Development through Globalization?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-29, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Michal Lyons & Colman Titus Msoka, 2010. "The World Bank and the Street: (How) Do ‘Doing Business’ Reforms Affect Tanzania’s Micro-traders?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 1079-1097, May.
    15. Onye, Kenneth U., 2016. "Neoclassical Economics: The Need for a Reconstruction," MPRA Paper 88473, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Rodrik, Dani, 2005. "Growth Strategies," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 967-1014, Elsevier.
    17. Cimoli, Mario & Correa, Nelson & Katz, Jorge & Studart, Rogério, 2003. "Institutional requirements for market-led development in Latin America," Series Históricas 7792, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Satish Mishra, 2002. "HISTORY IN THE MAKING - A systemic transition in Indonesia," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19.
    19. Frederic Tournemaine & Christopher Tsoukis, 2010. "Status, Fertility, Growth And The Great Transition," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 55(03), pages 553-574.
    20. Hrushikesh Mallick & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Hemachandra Padhan, 2020. "Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 67(4), pages 443-480, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:14:y:2019:i:4:p:271-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.