IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mbr/jmonec/v11y2016i4p375-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Bank Portfolio Investment Decision Considering Resistive Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Fekri, Roxana

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Payamenoor University)

  • Amiri, Maghsoud

    (Faculty of Management & Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University)

  • Sajjad, Rasoul

    (Department of Financial Engineering, University of Science and Culture)

  • Golestaneh, Ramin

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Payamenoor University)

Abstract

Increasing economy's resistance against the menace of sanctions, various risks, shocks, and internal and external threats are one of the main national policies which can be implemented through bank investments. Investment project selection is a complex and multi-criteria decision-making process that is influenced by multiple and often some conflicting objectives. This paper studies portfolio investment decisions in Iranian Banks. The main contribution of this paper is the creation of a project portfolio selection model that facilitates how Iranian banks would make investment decisions on proposed projects to satisfy bank profit maximization and risk minimization, while focus on national policies such as Resistance Economy Policies. The considered problem is formulated as a multi-objective integer programming model. A framework called Multi-Objective Electromagnetism-like (MOEM) algorithm, is developed to solve this NP-hard problem. To further enhance MOEM, a local search heuristic based on simulated annealing is incorporated in the algorithm. In order to demonstrate the efficiency and reliability of the proposed algorithm, a number of test are performed. The MOEM results are compared with two well-known multi-objective genetic algorithms in the literature, i.e. Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA-II) based on some comparison metrics. Also, these algorithms are compared with an integer linear programming formulation for small instances. Computational experiments indicate the superiority of the MOEM over existing algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Fekri, Roxana & Amiri, Maghsoud & Sajjad, Rasoul & Golestaneh, Ramin, 2016. "Optimization of Bank Portfolio Investment Decision Considering Resistive Economy," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 11(4), pages 375-400, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:mbr:jmonec:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:375-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-263-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-263-en.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pi-Fang Hsu & Mei-Ghing Hsu, 2008. "Optimizing the Information Outsourcing Practices of Primary Care Medical Organizations Using Entropy and TOPSIS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 181-201, April.
    2. Huang, Xiaoxia & Xiang, Lan & Islam, Sardar M.N., 2014. "Optimal project adjustment and selection," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 391-397.
    3. Robert L. Carraway & Robert L. Schmidt, 1991. "Note---An Improved Discrete Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Allocating Resources Among Interdependent Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(9), pages 1195-1200, September.
    4. Mavrotas, G. & Diakoulaki, D. & Caloghirou, Y., 2006. "Project prioritization under policy restrictions. A combination of MCDA with 0-1 programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 296-308, May.
    5. Medaglia, Andres L. & Graves, Samuel B. & Ringuest, Jeffrey L., 2007. "A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 869-894, June.
    6. Debels, Dieter & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2006. "A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 638-653, March.
    7. Karl Doerner & Walter Gutjahr & Richard Hartl & Christine Strauss & Christian Stummer, 2004. "Pareto Ant Colony Optimization: A Metaheuristic Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 79-99, October.
    8. James C. Bean, 1994. "Genetic Algorithms and Random Keys for Sequencing and Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 154-160, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lean Yu & Shouyang Wang & Fenghua Wen & Kin Lai, 2012. "Genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria project portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 71-86, August.
    2. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Katzensteiner, Stefan & Reiter, Peter & Stummer, Christian & Denk, Michaela, 2010. "Multi-objective decision analysis for competence-oriented project portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 670-679, September.
    3. Pérez, Fátima & Gómez, Trinidad & Caballero, Rafael & Liern, Vicente, 2018. "Project portfolio selection and planning with fuzzy constraints," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 117-129.
    4. Marques, Adriana Cavalcante & Frej, Eduarda Asfora & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2022. "Multicriteria decision support for project portfolio selection with the FITradeoff method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Javier Panadero & Jana Doering & Renatas Kizys & Angel A. Juan & Angels Fito, 2020. "A variable neighborhood search simheuristic for project portfolio selection under uncertainty," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 353-375, June.
    6. Fausto Balderas & Eduardo Fernandez & Claudia Gomez-Santillan & Nelson Rangel-Valdez & Laura Cruz, 2019. "An Interval-Based Approach for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization of Project Portfolios," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1317-1358, July.
    7. Farhad Hassanzadeh & Hamid Nemati & Minghe Sun, 2013. "Robust Optimization for Interactive Multiobjective Programming with Imprecise Information Applied to R&D Project Portfolio Selection," Working Papers 0194mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    8. Hassanzadeh, Farhad & Nemati, Hamid & Sun, Minghe, 2014. "Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 41-53.
    9. Paola Festa & Panos Pardalos, 2012. "Efficient solutions for the far from most string problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 663-682, July.
    10. Anurag Agarwal, 2009. "Theoretical insights into the augmented-neural-network approach for combinatorial optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 101-117, April.
    11. Ayşegül Altın & Bernard Fortz & Mikkel Thorup & Hakan Ümit, 2013. "Intra-domain traffic engineering with shortest path routing protocols," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 65-95, April.
    12. Ilkyeong Moon & Sanghyup Lee & Moonsoo Shin & Kwangyeol Ryu, 2016. "Evolutionary resource assignment for workload-based production scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 375-388, April.
    13. Len Vandenheede & Mario Vanhoucke & Broos Maenhout, 2016. "A scatter search for the extended resource renting problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4723-4743, August.
    14. Caetani, Alberto Pavlick & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2016. "Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-210.
    15. Kadri, Roubila Lilia & Boctor, Fayez F., 2018. "An efficient genetic algorithm to solve the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with transfer times: The single mode case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 454-462.
    16. Boxuan Zhao & Jianmin Gao & Kun Chen & Ke Guo, 2018. "Two-generation Pareto ant colony algorithm for multi-objective job shop scheduling problem with alternative process plans and unrelated parallel machines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 93-108, January.
    17. Siamak Kheybari & S. Ali Naji & Fariba Mahdi Rezaie & Reza Salehpour, 2019. "ABC classification according to Pareto’s principle: a hybrid methodology," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 539-562, June.
    18. Ranjbar, Mohammad & De Reyck, Bert & Kianfar, Fereydoon, 2009. "A hybrid scatter search for the discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 35-48, February.
    19. Philipp Rohlfshagen & John Bullinaria, 2010. "Nature inspired genetic algorithms for hard packing problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 393-419, September.
    20. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Project Portfolio Selection; Bank Investment; Resistive Economy; Multi-objective optimization; Electromagnetism-like algorithm; ɛ-constraint method.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mbr:jmonec:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:375-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M. E. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mbcbiir.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.