IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v71y2022i3p266-286n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitale Kompetenzen in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Bachmann Ronald

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen, DICE/Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, IZA, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Deutschland)

  • Hertweck Friederike

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen, Deutschland)

  • Kamb Rebecca

    (RWI – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland)

  • Lehner Judith

    (Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Deutschland)

  • Niederstadt Malte

    (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland)

Abstract

Based on the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), the study provides an overview of the distribution of digital literacy in Germany up to the beginning of the Covid pandemic. Already in childhood and adolescence, there are systematic differences in digital literacy depending on socio-economic background. Children with a migration background and those with unemployed parents show particularly low digital literacy. Gender-specific differences in digital literacy are small in childhood and adolescence, but clearly pronounced among adults. In addition, people with little formal education and people with a migration background have systematically lower digital competences in adulthood. The education sector should therefore promote the digital competences of children and young people at an early stage in order to compensate for the apparently low level of competence development outside the formal education sector. Educational opportunities for digitally less competent adults should also be strengthened to enable older generations to continue to participate in the changing spheres of life, education, and work.

Suggested Citation

  • Bachmann Ronald & Hertweck Friederike & Kamb Rebecca & Lehner Judith & Niederstadt Malte, 2022. "Digitale Kompetenzen in Deutschland," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 71(3), pages 266-286, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:71:y:2022:i:3:p:266-286:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2022-2082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2022-2082
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2022-2082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eszter Hargittai & Steven Shafer, 2006. "Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 87(2), pages 432-448, June.
    2. Breidenbach, Philipp & Hertweck, Friederike & Höckel, Lisa Sofie & Hörnig, Lukas & Schaffner, Sandra & Schweitzer, Michael, 2021. "Grundschulunterricht in Zeiten von Corona: Auswertungen einer Elternbefragung in NRW," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 241993.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galperin, Hernan & Arcidiacono, Malena, 2021. "Employment and the gender digital divide in Latin America: A decomposition analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    2. Cassandra E DiRienzo & Jayoti Das, 2021. "Formal Female Entrepreneurship and the Shadow Economy," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 13(5), pages 63-72.
    3. Srinuan, Chalita & Bohlin, Erik, 2013. "Analysis of fixed broadband access and use in Thailand: Drivers and barriers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 615-625.
    4. Ridhi Kashyap & Masoomali Fatehkia & Reham Al Tamime & Ingmar Weber, 2020. "Monitoring global digital gender inequality using the online populations of Facebook and Google," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(27), pages 779-816.
    5. Anuradha Mathrani & Rahila Umer & Tarushikha Sarvesh & Janak Adhikari, 2023. "Rural–Urban, Gender, and Digital Divides during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Layered Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Leogrande, Angelo & Magaletti, Nicola & Cosoli, Gabriele & Giardinelli, Vito O. M. & Massaro, Alessandro, 2022. "The Determinants of Internet User Skills in Europe," MPRA Paper 113123, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Cesia Roche & J. Mitchell Vaterlaus & Jimmy A. Young, 2015. "A Foster Care Alumna’s Past and Present Technological Experience," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    8. Lamberti, Giuseppe & Lopez-Sintas, Jordi & Sukphan, Jakkapong, 2021. "The social process of internet appropriation: Living in a digitally advanced country benefits less well-educated Europeans," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1).
    9. Josef Kuo-Hsun Ma & Todd E. Vachon & Simon Cheng, 2019. "National Income, Political Freedom, and Investments in R&D and Education: A Comparative Analysis of the Second Digital Divide Among 15-Year-Old Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 133-166, July.
    10. Allison, Lee & Liu, Yu & Murtinu, Samuele & Wei, Zuobao, 2023. "Gender and firm performance around the world: The roles of finance, technology and labor," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Lorena Martín-Párraga & Carmen Llorente-Cejudo & Julio Barroso-Osuna, 2023. "Self-Perception of Digital Competence in University Lecturers: A Comparative Study between Universities in Spain and Peru According to the DigCompEdu Model," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Hannah R. Marston & Kelly Niles-Yokum & Paula Alexandra Silva, 2021. "A Commentary on Blue Zones ® : A Critical Review of Age-Friendly Environments in the 21st Century and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-33, January.
    13. Occhini, Giulia & Tranos, Emmanouil & Wolf, Levi John, 2023. "Occupational segregation in the digital economy? A Natural Language Processing approach using UK Web Data," SocArXiv z8xta, Center for Open Science.
    14. Ellen Helsper, 2014. "Offline social identity and online chat partner selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51116, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. R Vaidehi & A Bheemeshwar Reddy & Sudatta Banerjee, 2021. "Explaining Caste-based Digital Divide in India," Papers 2106.15917, arXiv.org.
    16. Fatehkia, Masoomali & Kashyap, Ridhi & Weber, Ingmar, 2018. "Using Facebook Ad Data to Track the Global Digital Gender Gap," SocArXiv rkvb3, Center for Open Science.
    17. Marta Palczyńska & Maja Rynko, 2021. "ICT skills measurement in social surveys: Can we trust self-reports?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 917-943, June.
    18. Mario Grande-de-Prado & Ruth Cañón & Sheila García-Martín & Isabel Cantón, 2020. "Digital Competence and Gender: Teachers in Training. A Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Isabella Mingo & Roberta Bracciale, 2018. "The Matthew Effect in the Italian Digital Context: The Progressive Marginalisation of the “Poor”," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 629-659, January.
    20. Cristina Armuña & Sergio Ramos & Jesús Juan & Claudio Feijóo & Alberto Arenal, 2020. "From stand-up to start-up: exploring entrepreneurship competences and STEM women’s intention," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 69-92, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digitization; digital divide; digital literacy; inequality; NEPS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:71:y:2022:i:3:p:266-286:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.