IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v13y2022i2p303-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dialogue in the Philosophical and Educational Postmodern View

Author

Listed:
  • Halyna Zhukova

    (National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport)

  • Olha Vashevich

    (Mykhailo Boichuk Kyiv State Academy of Decorative Applied Arts and Desingn)

  • Oksana Patlaichuk

    (Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding)

  • Tetiana Shvets

    (Private school Athens in Kyiv)

  • Nataliia Torchynska

    (Khmelnytskyi National University)

  • Iryna Maidaniuk

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)

Abstract

The article analyses the modern assimilations of the definition ‘dialog’ and its rendering by the world academic community. Attention is drawn to the exceptional empirical significance of dialogics as a general scientific universal. The etymology of dialogue as a key category of philosophical, educational and pedagogical knowledge is identified. The evolution of the lead notionalists` ideas about the kernel and nature of dialogue that are relevant of the humanity itself, human mind and constant search of true knowledge is studied. A parallel is drawn between Socratic dialogue and dialogue in the postmodern educational and philosophic discourse. The problem of the antique thinkers` understanding of dialogue is studied discretely. The contemporary approaches to the fundamentals of dialogism, as outlined in the works of the lead theorists, are studied from the antiqueness to these days. It is highlighted how relevant and applicable for educational philosophy of the XXI century ‘G. Skovoroda`s dialogues’ are. It is ascertained that setting dialogue as autonomous subject of research of a particular school of thought reaches the works of L. Feuerbach with its thesis origins, but gets its final formulization in the works of M. Buber. The author dwells on the main theses of the approach of M. Bakhtin about the dialogic sources of the human beingness. The content and scope of the concepts ‘dialogical pedagogics’, ‘interactive dialogue’, ‘egalitarian dialogue’ are analysed. The advantages and disadvantages of the idea ‘knowledge building’ are studied. It is accentuated that the origins of many contemporary dialogue theories and methodologies date back to the ancient times and represent the attempts to integrate the ‘Socratic dialogue’ into the postmodern discourse. The state of adaptedness and conformance of the contemporary theories of dialogue to challenges of digitalisation and globalisation of the postmodern educational-philosophical space is studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Halyna Zhukova & Olha Vashevich & Oksana Patlaichuk & Tetiana Shvets & Nataliia Torchynska & Iryna Maidaniuk, 2022. "Dialogue in the Philosophical and Educational Postmodern View," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 303-320, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:303-320
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.2/455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/4882/3771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.2/455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Education philosophy; dialogical method; Socratic dialogue’; interactive dialogue; egalitarian dialogue; dialogical pedagogics; dialogical space;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • O0 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:303-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.