IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kelet-Közép-Európa a digitális selyemúton? Lehetséges politikai gazdaságtani magyarázatok
[Central and Eastern Europe on the Digital Silk Road? Possible political economic explanations]

Author

Listed:
  • Szunomár, Ágnes
  • Lima da Frota Araujo, Carlos Raul

Abstract

A kelet-közép-európai térség országai eltérő módon viszonyulnak ahhoz a kérdéshez, hogy bevonják-e - és ha igen, milyen mértékben - a kínai technológiai vállalatokat digitális átalakulásukba. A tanulmány központi kérdése éppen ezért az, hogy hogyan és miért reagálnak ezen országok eltérően Kína digitális selyemút kezdeményezésére. Az eltérő válaszok magyarázatára négy hipotézist fogalmazunk, majd vizsgálunk meg, figyelembe véve regionális, globális és nemzeti szintű tényezőket. Először azt a feltételezést vizsgáljuk, mely szerint a kapitalizmus helyi változata hatással van a vizsgált országok külpolitikai preferenciáira. Ezt követően elemezzük, vajon a 2008-as gazdasági válság nyomán Európában kialakult új mag-periféria törésvonal késztethette-e arra a kormányokat, hogy EU-n kívüli szereplők felé forduljanak. Teszteljük továbbá a kölcsönös gazdasági függésre és a biztonsági aggályokra vonatkozó nemzetközi politikai gazdaságtani meglátásokat. Végül azt a feltételezést is megvizsgáljuk, hogy az infrastrukturális fejlettség tekintetében elmaradottabb országok hajlamosabbak lehetnek-e Kínát bevonni infrastrukturális fejlesztéseikbe.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: F5, F63, P26, P33.

Suggested Citation

  • Szunomár, Ágnes & Lima da Frota Araujo, Carlos Raul, 2022. "Kelet-Közép-Európa a digitális selyemúton? Lehetséges politikai gazdaságtani magyarázatok [Central and Eastern Europe on the Digital Silk Road? Possible political economic explanations]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 367-388.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2038
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2022.3.367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2038
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2022.3.367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Istvan Magas, 2012. "External shocks and limited absorption in a small open economy: the case of Hungary," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Andrea Szalavetz, 2020. "Digital transformation – enabling factory economy actors’ entrepreneurial integration in global value chains?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 771-792, July.
    3. Miklós Szanyi, 2020. "Changing Trends of Foreign Direct Investments in East Central Europe," Studies in Economic Transition, in: Ágnes Szunomár (ed.), Emerging-market Multinational Enterprises in East Central Europe, chapter 0, pages 21-47, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Francesca Gambarotto & Stefano Solari, 2015. "The peripheralization of Southern European capitalism within the EMU," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 788-812, August.
    5. Mary Hallward-Driemeier & Gaurav Nayyar, 2017. "Trouble in the Making?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 27946, December.
    6. Bohle, Dorothee & Greskovits, Béla, 2007. "Capitalist diversity in Eastern Europe," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 3-9.
    7. Éltető, Andrea & Sass, Magdolna, 2021. "A kapitalizmus változatai és az ipar 4.0 a visegrádi országokban [Varieties of capitalism and industry 4.0 in the Visegrad countries]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 490-514.
    8. Dorothee Bohle, 2018. "European Integration, Capitalist Diversity and Crises Trajectories on Europe’s Eastern Periphery," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 239-253, March.
    9. Magdolna Sass & Andrea Szalavetz, 2013. "Crisis and Upgrading: The Case of the Hungarian Automotive and Electronics Sectors," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 489-507.
    10. Martin Myant & Jan Drahokoupil & Ivan Lesay, 2013. "The Political Economy of Crisis Management in East–Central European Countries," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 383-410.
    11. David Soskice, 2020. "The ICT revolution and neo-liberalism: Its major pathologies and a Polanyian second movement," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 17-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Éltető, Andrea & Sass, Magdolna, 2021. "A kapitalizmus változatai és az ipar 4.0 a visegrádi országokban [Varieties of capitalism and industry 4.0 in the Visegrad countries]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 490-514.
    2. Liagouras, George, 2018. "On the Edge of the South European Model: Familism, Business and State in Greece," OSF Preprints 8eqmb, Center for Open Science.
    3. Reto Bürgisser & Donato Di Carlo, 2023. "Blessing or Curse? The Rise of Tourism‐Led Growth in Europe's Southern Periphery," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 236-258, January.
    4. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Karsten Kohler & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2022. "Growing differently? Financial cycles, austerity, and competitiveness in growth models since the Global Financial Crisis," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 1314-1341, July.
    6. Marta Silva & João Carlos Lopes, 2020. "The structural adjustment of the Portuguese economy in the context of the economic reform of the Eurozone," Working Papers REM 2020/0143, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    7. Norbert Bajkó & Zsolt Fülöp & Kinga Nagyné Pércsi, 2022. "Changes in the Innovation- and Marketing-Habits of Family SMEs in the Foodstuffs Industry, Caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Peter Chobanov & Amine Lahiani & Nikolay Nenovsky, 2010. "Money Market Integration and Sovereign CDS Spreads Dynamics in the New EU States," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1002, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    9. Ajit K. Ghose, 2021. "Structural Change and Development in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(1), pages 7-29, April.
    10. Al Rainnie, 2021. "i4.0, 3D printing, deglobalisation and new manufacturing clusters: The view from Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 115-133, March.
    11. Claudius Gräbner & Philipp Heimberger & Jakob Kapeller & Bernhard Schütz, 2020. "Structural change in times of increasing openness: assessing path dependency in European economic integration," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1467-1495, November.
    12. Baldwin, Richard & Forslid, Rikard, 2023. "Globotics and Development: When Manufacturing Is Jobless and Services Are Tradeable," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3-4), pages 302-311, October.
    13. Andrea Szalavetz, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Development Strategy in Dependent Market Economies - Any Room amidst Big Power Rivalry?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 40-54.
    14. Cherif Reda & Hasanov Fuad, 2019. "Principles of True Industrial Policy," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Dimiter IALNAZOV & Nikolay NENOVSKY, 2010. "The Evolution of Post-Communist Countries: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Cooperation," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 1600, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    16. Seth Schindler & Jonathan Silver, 2019. "Florida in the Global South: How Eurocentrism Obscures Global Urban Challenges—and What We Can Do about It," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 794-805, July.
    17. Dumitriu, Ramona & Stefanescu, Răzvan, 2016. "Strategic decisions on industrialization: case of Galati Steel Works," MPRA Paper 89007, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    18. Alina Butu & Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Lucian Tanasă & Steliana Rodino & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Sebastian Doboș & Marian Butu, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 Crisis upon the Consumer Buying Behavior of Fresh Vegetables Directly from Local Producers. Case Study: The Quarantined Area of Suceava County, Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Xiuxiu Jiang & Xia Wang & Jia Ren & Zhimin Xie, 2023. "Digital economy, agglomeration, and entrepreneurship in Chinese cities," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 359-370, January.
    20. Mathias Lund Larsen, 2023. "Bottom-up market-facilitation and top-down market-steering: comparing and conceptualizing green finance approaches in the EU and China," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 61-80, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights
    • P33 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - International Trade, Finance, Investment, Relations, and Aid

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.