IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v9y1996i2p43-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Myth of Natural Monopoly

Author

Listed:
  • DiLorenzo, Thomas J

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • DiLorenzo, Thomas J, 1996. "The Myth of Natural Monopoly," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 43-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:9:y:1996:i:2:p:43-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitrii Trubnikov, 2020. "The Russian Telecommunications Experience: a Positive Outcome of the Competitive Order in the Industry," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 35-58, March.
    2. Martin Hon, 2008. "Historie konceptu přirozeného monopolu [History of natural monopoly concept]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(6), pages 833-842.
    3. Tatiana A. Meshkova & Evgenii IA. Moiseichev, 2016. "Russia’s experience of foresight implementation in global value chain research," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-35, December.
    4. Tatyana Meshkova & Evgeny Moiseichev, 2016. "Foresight Applications to the Analysis of Global Value Chains," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 69-82.
    5. Zheng, Xian & Xie, Xiaorong & Zheng, Linzi, 2023. "Land market concentration, developers’ pricing decisions, and class monopoly rent in urban China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Dmitrii Trubnikov & Ekaterina Trubnikova, 2018. "Is Universal Service Justified By The Public Interest? From The Early Days To The Digital Age," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 185-196, June.
    7. Manuela Mosca, 2015. "A Review of "Réglementations et concurrence dans le chemins de fer français, 1823-1914", by Guy Numa," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 140-144, February.
    8. Walter E. Block, 2017. "Radical Privatization: Oceans, Roads,Heavenly Bodies," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 12(2), pages 41-56, June.
    9. Tatiana A. Meshkova & Evgenii IA. Moiseichev, 2015. "Russia’S Experience of Foresight Implementation in Global Value Chain Research," HSE Working papers WP BRP 47/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    10. Geels, Frank W., 2014. "Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 261-277.
    11. Satoła Łukasz, 2017. "Spatial Diversity of Municipal Capital Companies in Poland," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 32-41, September.
    12. Dodd, Tracey & Orlitzky, Marc & Nelson, Tim, 2018. "What stalls a renewable energy industry? Industry outlook of the aviation biofuels industry in Australia, Germany, and the USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 92-103.
    13. Vassiliev, M. & Filatov, A., 2011. "The Models of Strategic Interaction between Network and Generating Companies at Electricity Transmission Market," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 10, pages 54-73.
    14. Robert Gmeiner, 2021. "Amimetic assets and persistent profits under competition," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 253-277, June.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4153 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jordan Reel & Walter E. Block, 2013. "Educational Vouchers: Freedom to Choose?," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(4), December.
    17. Patrik Paneš & Josef Šíma, 2005. "The challenges of antitrust law in 21st century [Výzvy antimonopolní politiky v 21. století]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(3), pages 69-80.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:9:y:1996:i:2:p:43-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.