IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v42y2023i1d10.1007_s11113-023-09754-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

American Community Survey (ACS) Data Uncertainty and the Analysis of Segregation Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Wei

    (University of California)

  • Elijah Knaap

    (San Diego State University)

  • Sergio Rey

    (San Diego State University)

Abstract

American Community Survey (ACS) data have become the workhorse for the empirical analysis of segregation in the U.S.A. during the past decade. The increased frequency the ACS offers over the 10-year Census, which is the main reason for its popularity, comes with an increased level of uncertainty in the published estimates due to the reduced sampling ratio of ACS (1:40 households) relative to the Census (1:6 households). This paper introduces a new approach to integrate ACS data uncertainty into the analysis of segregation. Our method relies on variance replicate estimates for the 5-year ACS and advances over existing approaches by explicitly taking into account the covariance between ACS estimates when developing sampling distributions for segregation indices. We illustrate our approach with a study of comparative segregation dynamics for 29 metropolitan statistical areas in California, using the 2010–2014 and 2015–2019. Our methods yield different results than the simulation technique described by Napierala and Denton (Demography 54(1):285–309, 2017). Taking the ACS estimate covariance into account yields larger error margins than those generated with the simulated approach when the number of census tracts is large and minority percentage is low, and the converse is true when the number of census tracts is small and minority percentage is high.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Wei & Elijah Knaap & Sergio Rey, 2023. "American Community Survey (ACS) Data Uncertainty and the Analysis of Segregation Dynamics," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:42:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11113-023-09754-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-023-09754-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-023-09754-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-023-09754-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renan Xavier Cortes & Sergio Rey & Elijah Knaap & Levi John Wolf, 2020. "An open-source framework for non-spatial and spatial segregation measures: the PySAL segregation module," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 135-166, April.
    2. Sean F. Reardon & Kendra Bischoff & Ann Owens & Joseph B. Townsend, 2018. "Has Income Segregation Really Increased? Bias and Bias Correction in Sample-Based Segregation Estimates," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(6), pages 2129-2160, December.
    3. Rebecca Allen & Simon Burgess & Russell Davidson & Frank Windmeijer, 2015. "More reliable inference for the dissimilarity index of segregation," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(1), pages 40-66, February.
    4. Sergio Rey & Myrna Sastré-Gutiérrez, 2010. "Interregional Inequality Dynamics in Mexico," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 277-298.
    5. Jason R. Jurjevich & Amy L. Griffin & Seth E. Spielman & David C. Folch & Meg Merrick & Nicholas N. Nagle, 2018. "Navigating Statistical Uncertainty: How Urban and Regional Planners Understand and Work With American Community Survey (ACS) Data for Guiding Policy," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(2), pages 112-126, April.
    6. Jeffrey Napierala & Nancy Denton, 2017. "Measuring Residential Segregation With the ACS: How the Margin of Error Affects the Dissimilarity Index," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(1), pages 285-309, February.
    7. Davidson, Russell, 2009. "Reliable inference for the Gini index," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 30-40, May.
    8. Michael R. Ransom, 2000. "Sampling Distributions of Segregation Indexes," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 28(4), pages 454-475, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renan Xavier Cortes & Sergio Rey & Elijah Knaap & Levi John Wolf, 2020. "An open-source framework for non-spatial and spatial segregation measures: the PySAL segregation module," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 135-166, April.
    2. David C. Folch & Seth Spielman & Molly Graber, 2023. "The Impact of Covariance on American Community Survey Margins of Error: Computational Alternatives," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(4), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Coral Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2022. "On Measuring Segregation in a Multigroup Context: Standardized Versus Unstandardized Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 633-659, September.
    4. Kutscher, Macarena & Nath, Shanjukta & Urzúa, Sergio, 2023. "Centralized admission systems and school segregation: Evidence from a national reform," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Filippo Temporin, 2019. "A multilevel structural equation modelling approach to study segregation of deprivation: an application to Bolivia," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1657-1674, May.
    6. Burger, Kaspar, 2019. "The socio-spatial dimension of educational inequality: A comparative European analysis," MPRA Paper 95309, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    7. Gwilym Owen & Yu Chen & Timothy Birabi & Gwilym Pryce & Hui Song & Bifeng Wang, 2023. "Residential segregation of migrants: Disentangling the intersectional and multiscale segregation of migrants in Shijiazhuang, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 166-182, January.
    8. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    9. John R. Logan & Andrew Foster & Hongwei Xu & Wenquan Zhang, 2020. "Income Segregation: Up or Down, and for Whom?," NBER Working Papers 27045, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. William E. Griffiths and Gholamreza Hajargasht, 2012. "GMM Estimation of Mixtures from Grouped Data:," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1148, The University of Melbourne.
    11. Karoly, Lynn & Schröder, Carsten, 2015. "Fast methods for jackknifing inequality indices," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 37(1), pages 125-138.
    12. Juan Gabriel Brida & Juan Pereyra & Martín Puchet Anyul & Wiston Adrián Risso, 2011. "Regímenes de desempeño económico y dualismo estructural en la dinámica de las entidades federativas de México, 1970 - 2006," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1011, Department of Economics - dECON.
    13. Jonas Klos & Tim Krieger & Sven Stöwhase, 2022. "Measuring intra-generational redistribution in PAYG pension schemes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 53-73, January.
    14. Mijs, Jonathan Jan Benjamin, 2019. "The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy go Hand in Hand," SocArXiv dcr9b, Center for Open Science.
    15. Sudheesh K. Kattumannil & N. Sreelakshmi & N. Balakrishnan, 2022. "Non-Parametric Inference for Gini Covariance and its Variants," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 790-807, August.
    16. Sean F. Reardon & Kendra Bischoff & Ann Owens & Joseph B. Townsend, 2018. "Has Income Segregation Really Increased? Bias and Bias Correction in Sample-Based Segregation Estimates," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(6), pages 2129-2160, December.
    17. Stephen P. Jenkins & John Micklewright & Sylke V. Schnepf, 2006. "Social segregation in secondary schools: How does England compare with other countries?," Working Papers 27, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    18. Angelo Mazza & Antonio Punzo, 2015. "On the Upward Bias of the Dissimilarity Index and Its Corrections," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(1), pages 80-107, February.
    19. Sevilla, María Paola & Treviño, Ernesto, 2021. "Socioeconomic segregation between and within curriculum tracking," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    20. Schneider, Kerstin & Schuchart, Claudia & Weishaupt, Horst & Riedel, Andrea, 2012. "The effect of free primary school choice on ethnic groups — Evidence from a policy reform," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 430-444.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ACS; Uncertainty; Segregation;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:42:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11113-023-09754-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.