IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v18y2020i3d10.1007_s10308-019-00550-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16+1 platform’

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Turcsányi

    (Palacký University)

  • Runya Qiaoan

    (Palacký University)

Abstract

China and the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries have been engaged recently in dynamic diplomatic exchanges under the umbrella of 16+1 platform and the Belt and Road Initiative. The article offers an explanation of why the massive Chinese diplomatic effort did not lead to an improved image of China in the CEE region. We adopt the approach of cultural sociology and focus on how the two sides’ ‘meaning structures’ relate to each other. It is argued that main China’s discourse frame of ‘traditional friendship’ based on the shared socialist past is not well received in most of the CEE region which has quite problematic view of Communism due to own historic experience. The dissonance between the Chinese friendly rhetoric and the CEE lukewarm reception imply some deep-cutting differences when it comes to views of history which have significant political implications for current and future relations between the two sides.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Turcsányi & Runya Qiaoan, 2020. "Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16+1 platform’," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 397-412, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:18:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10308-019-00550-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent K. L. Chang & Frank N. Pieke, 2018. "Europe’s engagement with China: shifting Chinese views of the EU and the EU-China relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 317-331, December.
    2. Duncan Freeman, 2017. "Redistributing the EU-China economic relationship: the role of domestic change in China," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 187-198, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fangxing Qin & Jeremy Garlick & Siyang Liu, 2023. "A meteoric strategic partnership? The still long march of mutual understanding and trust between China and the Czech Republic," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 43-59, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Christiansen & Richard Maher, 2017. "The rise of China—challenges and opportunities for the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-131, June.
    2. Chun Gan, 2020. "Discourse on Europe’s Migrant Crisis in Chinese Social Media: Recontextualising Nationalism and Defending Perceived Homogeneity," China Report, , vol. 56(1), pages 19-38, February.
    3. Yu-Wen Chen & Yufan Hao, 2020. "Czech perceptions of the rise of China: a survey among university students," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 157-175, March.
    4. Yu-Han Cai & Charalampos Efstathopoulos, 2023. "Between economic openness and strategic caution: Germany’s response to China’s investment," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 291-309, September.
    5. Adam A. Ambroziak & Joanna Stefaniak, 2022. "The position of China in trade in services within the European Union," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 335-354, June.
    6. Ben Derudder & Xiang Feng & Wei Shen & Rui Shao & Peter J. Taylor, 2022. "Connections between Asian and European World Cities: Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:18:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10308-019-00550-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.