IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v18y2020i1d10.1007_s10308-019-00542-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Czech perceptions of the rise of China: a survey among university students

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Wen Chen

    (University of Helsinki
    Palacky University)

  • Yufan Hao

    (Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen))

Abstract

China has increased its investment and influence in Central-Eastern European (CEE) countries through the “16 + 1” framework in 2011 and the One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiatives in 2013. Given China’s rising influence, this paper explores civilian views of China in the Czech Republic. Using survey analysis of 663 respondents in 11 Czech universities, we find that our respondents’ impression of China is neither negative nor positive. By contrast, they do not have a good impression of Russia. Their impression of Japan is the best. Our respondents recognize that China is the most influential player in Asia. Albeit divided, there is a tendency for respondents to believe that China will surpass the USA as the world’s leading power, but they cannot reach consensus on whether such development will be peaceful or not. Our survey also finds out that, while the Czech government wishes to get closer to China politically and economically, citizens are somewhat divided on various dimensions of issues concerning China. This is a pattern that continues from the past. The 2013 change of political landscape in the Czech Republic does not seem to have altered many of the societal responses to China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Wen Chen & Yufan Hao, 2020. "Czech perceptions of the rise of China: a survey among university students," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 157-175, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:18:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10308-019-00542-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-019-00542-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-019-00542-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-019-00542-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent K. L. Chang & Frank N. Pieke, 2018. "Europe’s engagement with China: shifting Chinese views of the EU and the EU-China relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 317-331, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Turcsányi & Runya Qiaoan, 2020. "Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16+1 platform’," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 397-412, September.
    2. Chun Gan, 2020. "Discourse on Europe’s Migrant Crisis in Chinese Social Media: Recontextualising Nationalism and Defending Perceived Homogeneity," China Report, , vol. 56(1), pages 19-38, February.
    3. Yu-Han Cai & Charalampos Efstathopoulos, 2023. "Between economic openness and strategic caution: Germany’s response to China’s investment," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 291-309, September.
    4. Ben Derudder & Xiang Feng & Wei Shen & Rui Shao & Peter J. Taylor, 2022. "Connections between Asian and European World Cities: Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:18:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10308-019-00542-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.