IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/apfinm/v26y2019i2d10.1007_s10690-018-9261-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analytic Market Condition for Mutual Fund Separation: Demand for the Non-Sharpe Ratio Maximizing Portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Toru Igarashi

    (Hitotsubashi University)

Abstract

This study finds a necessary and sufficient condition for mutual fund separation, in which investors have the same portfolio of risky assets regardless of their utility functions. Unlike previous studies, the market condition is obtained in analytic form, using the Clark–Ocone formula of Ocone and Karatzas (Stoch Stoch Rep 34(3–4):187–220, 1991). We also find that the condition for separation among arbitrary utility functions is equivalent to the condition for separation among utility functions with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA utility functions). The condition is that a conditional expectation of an infinitesimal change in the uncertainty of an instantaneous Sharpe ratio maximizing portfolio can be hedged by the Sharpe ratio maximizer itself. In a Markovian market, such an infinitesimal change is characterized as an infinitesimal change in state variables. A closer look at the Clark–Ocone formula offers an intuition of the condition: an investor invests in (1) the Sharpe ratio maximizer; and (2) another portfolio in such a way as to reduce the uncertainty produced by an infinitesimal change in the Sharpe ratio maximizer, depending on four components: the investor’s wealth level, marginal utility and risk tolerance, at the time of consumption, and the shadow price. This decomposition is also valid in non-Markovian markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Toru Igarashi, 2019. "An Analytic Market Condition for Mutual Fund Separation: Demand for the Non-Sharpe Ratio Maximizing Portfolio," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(2), pages 169-185, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:apfinm:v:26:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10690-018-9261-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10690-018-9261-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10690-018-9261-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10690-018-9261-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merton, Robert C, 1973. "An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(5), pages 867-887, September.
    2. Walter Schachermayer & Mihai Sîrbu & Erik Taflin, 2009. "In which financial markets do mutual fund theorems hold true?," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-77, January.
    3. Nikolai Dokuchaev, 2014. "Mutual Fund Theorem for continuous time markets with random coefficients," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 179-199, February.
    4. Lars Nielsen & Maria Vassalou, 2006. "The instantaneous capital market line," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 28(3), pages 651-664, August.
    5. Chamberlain, Gary, 1988. "Asset Pricing in Multiperiod Securities Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(6), pages 1283-1300, November.
    6. Dybvig, Philip & Liu, Fang, 2018. "On investor preferences and mutual fund separation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 224-260.
    7. Cass, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1970. "The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation: A contribution to the pure theory of mutual funds," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 122-160, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Leoff & Leonie Ruderer & Jörn Sass, 2022. "Signal-to-noise matrix and model reduction in continuous-time hidden Markov models," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(2), pages 327-359, April.
    2. Bruno Feunou & Jean-Sébastien Fontaine & Abderrahim Taamouti & Roméo Tédongap, 2014. "Risk Premium, Variance Premium, and the Maturity Structure of Uncertainty," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 18(1), pages 219-269.
    3. Romain Deguest & Lionel Martellini & Vincent Milhau, 2018. "A Reinterpretation of the Optimal Demand for Risky Assets in Fund Separation Theorems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4333-4347, September.
    4. Fernando Alvarez, 2018. "A three mutual fund separation theorem," 2018 Meeting Papers 1066, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    5. Maio, Paulo & Santa-Clara, Pedro, 2012. "Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 586-613.
    6. de Oliveira Souza, Thiago, 2016. "The size premium and intertemporal risk," Discussion Papers on Economics 3/2016, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Framstad, N.C., 2011. "Portfolio separation properties of the skew-elliptical distributions, with generalizations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(12), pages 1862-1866.
    9. Jerome Detemple & Marcel Rindisbacher & Scott Robertson, 2020. "Dynamic Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibrium With Insider Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(6), pages 2697-2737, November.
    10. Larsen, Linda Sandris, 2010. "Optimal investment strategies in an international economy with stochastic interest rates," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 145-165, January.
    11. Nawalkha, Sanjay K., 1997. "A multibeta representation theorem for linear asset pricing theories," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 357-381, December.
    12. Sangwon Suh & Wonho Song & Bong-Soo Lee, 2014. "A new method for forming asset pricing factors from firm characteristics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(28), pages 3463-3482, October.
    13. Daniele Checchi, 1992. "What are the Real Effects of Liberalizing International Capital Movements?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 83-125, February.
    14. Walter Schachermayer & Mihai Sîrbu & Erik Taflin, 2009. "In which financial markets do mutual fund theorems hold true?," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-77, January.
    15. Tomas Björk & Bertil Näslund, 1998. "Diversified Portfolios in Continuous Time," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 1(3), pages 361-387.
    16. Munk, Claus, 2015. "Financial Asset Pricing Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198716457, Decembrie.
    17. Auerbach, Alan J, 1983. "Taxation, Corporate Financial Policy and the Cost of Capital," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(3), pages 905-940, September.
    18. Gregory Phelan & Alexis Akira Toda, 2015. "On the Robustness of Theoretical Asset Pricing Models," Department of Economics Working Papers 2015-10, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    19. Yuki Shigeta, 2017. "Portfolio selections under mean-variance preference with multiple priors for means and variances," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 97-124, February.
    20. Kim, In Joon & Kim, So Jung & Yoon, Sun-Joong, 2014. "A dark side of international capital market integration: Domestic investors' view," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 238-256.
    21. Sylvain Chassang, 2016. "Mostly Prior-Free Asset Allocation," Working Papers 077_2016, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mutual fund separation; Portfolio choice; Numéraire portfolio; Risk aversion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:apfinm:v:26:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10690-018-9261-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.