IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isp/journl/v13y2019i1p399-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ways Of Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility Efforts For Today’S Consumer: The Opinions Of Consumers And Experts

Author

Listed:
  • Toms Kreicbergs
  • Modrite Pelse

Abstract

This research examines the ways of how companies advertise their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) efforts to the consumers. It examines how effective those ways, methods and channels are. The research analyzes studies conducted in the field of CSR with a thorough literature review and compares them to the results gathered from in-depth interviews with experts of CSR field that follow the tendencies of the consumer’s needs and execute CSR strategy and campaigns, as well as the results from a focus group with consumers. The research found that in order for the company to have a great return on investment on their CSR efforts, meaning for their CSR promotional activities to be successful, companies have to first make sure their supply chain is transparent, employees are treated well and so forth, thus the company would not create backfire or cause controversy. Also, it was found that the most effective platform to advertise company’s CSR efforts is social media by using content marketing, as well as using the third party as an information source is quite beneficial because it insures credibility, and choosing the CSR issue that is related to the business of the company. The research also found that consumers are quite skeptical and cynical toward some of the CSR campaigns. Consumers often find CSR campaigns not to be genuine but rather solely based on profit or covering up social irresponsibility on the behalf of the company. However, when the CSR is embedded at the core of the brand consumers find CSR very compelling and appreciate it greatly.

Suggested Citation

  • Toms Kreicbergs & Modrite Pelse, 2019. "The Ways Of Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility Efforts For Today’S Consumer: The Opinions Of Consumers And Experts," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 13(1), pages 399-406.
  • Handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:399-406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-publications.net/get/1000037/1570291870622231.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joëlle Vanhamme & Valérie Swaen & Guido Berens & Catherine Janssen, 2015. "Playing with fire: aggravating and buffering effects of ex ante CSR communication campaigns for companies facing allegations of social irresponsibility," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 565-578, December.
    2. Neva Štumberger & Urša Golob, 2016. "On the Discursive Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Advertising Agencies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 521-536, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Antonetti & Ilaria Baghi, 2021. "How the sender’s positioning and the target’s CSR record influence the effectiveness of scapegoating crisis communications," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 411-423, December.
    2. Marcinkowska Elzbieta & Sawicka Joanna, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Factor Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Consumers in Central and Eastern Europe," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 281-299.
    3. Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg, 2018. "The Link Between (Not) Practicing CSR and Corporate Reputation: Psychological Foundations and Managerial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 185-198, June.
    4. Kim, Junghyun & Park, Taehoon, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility (CSR) saves a company: The role of gratitude in buffering vindictive consumer behavior from product failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 461-472.
    5. Gabriela Gutierrez-Huerter O & Stefan Gold & Alexander Trautrims, 2023. "Change in Rhetoric but not in Action? Framing of the Ethical Issue of Modern Slavery in a UK Sector at High Risk of Labor Exploitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 35-58, January.
    6. Ilaria Baghi & Paolo Antonetti, 2021. "The higher they climb, the harder they fall: The role of self‐brand connectedness in consumer responses to corporate social responsibility hypocrisy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1216-1230, July.
    7. Marta Pizzetti & Lucia Gatti & Peter Seele, 2021. "Firms Talk, Suppliers Walk: Analyzing the Locus of Greenwashing in the Blame Game and Introducing ‘Vicarious Greenwashing’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 21-38, April.
    8. Janssen, Catherine & Swaen, Valérie & Du, Shuili, 2022. "Is a specific claim always better? The double-edged effects of claim specificity in green advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 435-447.
    9. Gatti, Lucia & Pizzetti, Marta & Seele, Peter, 2021. "Green lies and their effect on intention to invest," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 228-240.
    10. Paolo Antonetti & Benedetta Crisafulli & Aybars Tuncdogan, 2021. "“Just Look the Other Way”: Job Seekers’ Reactions to the Irresponsibility of Market-Dominant Employers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 403-422, November.
    11. Sojung Kim & Sejung Marina Choi, 2018. "Congruence Effects in Post-crisis CSR Communication: The Mediating Role of Attribution of Corporate Motives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 447-463, December.
    12. Richter, Ulf Henning & Shirodkar, Vikrant & Shete, Namita, 2021. "Firm-level indicators of instrumental and political CSR processes – A multiple case study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 279-290.
    13. Rebecca K. Trump & Kevin P. Newman, 2017. "When do unethical brand perceptions spill over to competitors?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 219-230, June.
    14. Su, Lujun & Gong, Qi & Huang, Yinghua, 2020. "How do destination social responsibility strategies affect tourists’ intention to visit? An attribution theory perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Belinda Wade & Andrew Griffiths, 2022. "Exploring the Cognitive Foundations of Managerial (Climate) Change Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 15-40, November.
    16. Valor, Carmen & Antonetti, Paolo & Zasuwa, Grzegorz, 2022. "Corporate social irresponsibility and consumer punishment: A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1218-1233.
    17. Robinson, Stefanie & Eilert, Meike, 2018. "The role of message specificity in corporate social responsibility communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 260-268.
    18. Kyle D. Turner, 2022. "Actions in the spotlight: Differential effects of corporate social responsibility actions on organizational celebrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 860-870, July.
    19. Price, Joseph M. & Sun, Wenbin, 2017. "Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-97.
    20. Zhe Zhang & Mijia Gong & Shanshan Zhang & Ming Jia, 2023. "Buffering or Aggravating Effect? Examining the Effects of Prior Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 147-163, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate social responsibility (csr); sustainability; consumers; the environment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:399-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svetoslav Ivanov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scientific-publications.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.