IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v51y2017i1p88-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Disruption Management and Flight Planning to Trade Off Delays and Fuel Burn

Author

Listed:
  • Lavanya Marla

    (University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Bo Vaaben

    (Ops-Analytics, 3060 Espergaerde, Denmark)

  • Cynthia Barnhart

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

In this paper we present a novel approach addressing airline delays and recovery. Airline schedule recovery involves making decisions during operations to minimize additional operating costs while getting back on schedule as quickly as possible. The mechanisms used include aircraft swaps, flight cancellations, crew swaps, reserve crews, and passenger rebookings. In this context, we introduce another mechanism, namely flight planning that enables flight speed changes. Flight planning is the process of determining flight plan(s) specifying the route of a flight, its speed, and its associated fuel burn. Our key idea in integrating flight planning and disruption management is to adjust the speeds of flights during operations, trading off flying time (and along with it, block time) and fuel burn; in combination with existing mechanisms, such as flight holds. Our goal is striking the right balance of fuel costs and passenger-related delay costs incurred by the airline. We present both exact and approximate models for integrated aircraft and passenger recovery with flight planning. From computational experiments on data provided by a European airline, we estimate that the ability of our approach to control (decrease or increase) flying time by trading off with fuel burn, as well as to hold downstream flights, results in reductions in passenger disruptions by approximately 66%–83%, accompanied by small increases in fuel burn of 0.152%–0.155% and a total cost savings of approximately 5.7%–5.9% for the airline, may be achieved compared to baseline approaches typically used in practice. We discuss the relative benefits of two mechanisms studied—specifically, flight speed changes and intentionally holding flight departures, and show significant synergies in applying these mechanisms. The results, compared with recovery without integrated flight planning, are because of increased swap possibilities during recovery, decreased numbers of flight cancellations, and fewer disruptions to passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lavanya Marla & Bo Vaaben & Cynthia Barnhart, 2017. "Integrated Disruption Management and Flight Planning to Trade Off Delays and Fuel Burn," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 88-111, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:51:y:2017:i:1:p:88-111
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2015.0609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cynthia Barnhart & Timothy S. Kniker & Manoj Lohatepanont, 2002. "Itinerary-Based Airline Fleet Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 199-217, May.
    2. Sherali, Hanif D. & Bish, Ebru K. & Zhu, Xiaomei, 2006. "Airline fleet assignment concepts, models, and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Young, Hwei-Fwa, 1996. "A decision support framework for multi-fleet routing and multi-stop flight scheduling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 379-398, September.
    4. Kohl, Niklas & Larsen, Allan & Larsen, Jesper & Ross, Alex & Tiourine, Sergey, 2007. "Airline disruption management—Perspectives, experiences and outlook," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 149-162.
    5. T. Andersson * & P. Värbrand, 2004. "The flight perturbation problem," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 91-117, March.
    6. Thengvall, Benjamin G. & Yu, Gang & Bard, Jonathan F., 2001. "Multiple fleet aircraft schedule recovery following hub closures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 289-308, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Zhouchun & Luo, Xiaodong & Jin, Xianfei & Karichery, Sureshan, 2022. "An iterative cost-driven copy generation approach for aircraft recovery problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 334-348.
    2. Jane Lee & Lavanya Marla & Alexandre Jacquillat, 2020. "Dynamic Disruption Management in Airline Networks Under Airport Operating Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 973-997, July.
    3. Ding, Yida & Wandelt, Sebastian & Wu, Guohua & Xu, Yifan & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Towards efficient airline disruption recovery with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Wang, Chunzheng & Hu, Minghua & Yang, Lei & Zhao, Zheng, 2022. "Improving the spatial-temporal generalization of flight block time prediction: A development of stacking models," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Lei Kang & Mark Hansen, 2021. "Quantile Regression–Based Estimation of Dynamic Statistical Contingency Fuel," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 257-273, 1-2.
    6. Li, Max Z. & Ryerson, Megan S., 2019. "Reviewing the DATAS of aviation research data: Diversity, availability, tractability, applicability, and sources," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 111-130.
    7. Biao Yuan & Zhibin Jiang, 2017. "Disruption Management for the Real-Time Home Caregiver Scheduling and Routing Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Uğur Arıkan & Sinan Gürel & M. Selim Aktürk, 2017. "Flight Network-Based Approach for Integrated Airline Recovery with Cruise Speed Control," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1259-1287, November.
    9. Naz Yeti̇moğlu, Yücel & Selim Aktürk, M., 2021. "Aircraft and passenger recovery during an aircraft’s unexpected unavailability," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Evler, Jan & Asadi, Ehsan & Preis, Henning & Fricke, Hartmut, 2021. "Airline ground operations: Optimal schedule recovery with uncertain arrival times," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Birolini, Sebastian & Jacquillat, Alexandre, 2023. "Day-ahead aircraft routing with data-driven primary delay predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 379-396.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João P. Pita & Cynthia Barnhart & António P. Antunes, 2013. "Integrated Flight Scheduling and Fleet Assignment Under Airport Congestion," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 477-492, November.
    2. Khaled, Oumaima & Minoux, Michel & Mousseau, Vincent & Michel, Stéphane & Ceugniet, Xavier, 2018. "A multi-criteria repair/recovery framework for the tail assignment problem in airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 137-151.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui & Fu, Tseng-Chih, 2008. "An airline scheduling model and solution algorithms under stochastic demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 22-39, October.
    4. Okan Örsan Özener & Melda Örmeci Matoğlu & Güneş Erdoğan & Mohamed Haouari & Hasan Sözer, 2017. "Solving a large-scale integrated fleet assignment and crew pairing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 477-500, June.
    5. Bard, Jonathan F. & Mohan, Dinesh Natarajan, 2008. "Reallocating arrival slots during a ground delay program," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 113-134, February.
    6. Hanif D. Sherali & Xiaomei Zhu, 2008. "Two-Stage Fleet Assignment Model Considering Stochastic Passenger Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 383-399, April.
    7. Jon D. Petersen & Gustaf Sölveling & John-Paul Clarke & Ellis L. Johnson & Sergey Shebalov, 2012. "An Optimization Approach to Airline Integrated Recovery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 482-500, November.
    8. Brouer, Berit D. & Dirksen, Jakob & Pisinger, David & Plum, Christian E.M. & Vaaben, Bo, 2013. "The Vessel Schedule Recovery Problem (VSRP) – A MIP model for handling disruptions in liner shipping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 362-374.
    9. Hanif Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2013. "A benders decomposition approach for an integrated airline schedule design and fleet assignment problem with flight retiming, schedule balance, and demand recapture," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 213-244, November.
    10. Nianyi Wang & Huiling Wang & Shan Pei & Boyu Zhang, 2023. "A Data-Driven Heuristic Method for Irregular Flight Recovery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Pilla, Venkata L. & Rosenberger, Jay M. & Chen, Victoria & Engsuwan, Narakorn & Siddappa, Sheela, 2012. "A multivariate adaptive regression splines cutting plane approach for solving a two-stage stochastic programming fleet assignment model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 162-171.
    12. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Azadian, Farshid, 2023. "The airline seat capacity allocation problem: An expected marginal profit approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Hanif D. Sherali & Ebru K. Bish & Xiaomei Zhu, 2005. "Polyhedral Analysis and Algorithms for a Demand-Driven Refleeting Model for Aircraft Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 349-366, August.
    14. Vaaben, Bo & Larsen, Jesper, 2015. "Mitigation of airspace congestion impact on airline networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 54-65.
    15. Saravanan Venkatachalam & Suresh Acharya & Kenji Oba & Yoshinari Nakayama, 2020. "Prescriptive Analytics for Swapping Aircraft Assignments at All Nippon Airways," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 99-111, March.
    16. Hanif D. Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2010. "Integrated Airline Schedule Design and Fleet Assignment: Polyhedral Analysis and Benders' Decomposition Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 500-513, November.
    17. Birolini, Sebastian & Antunes, António Pais & Cattaneo, Mattia & Malighetti, Paolo & Paleari, Stefano, 2021. "Integrated flight scheduling and fleet assignment with improved supply-demand interactions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 162-180.
    18. Alderighi, Marco & Gaggero, Alberto A., 2018. "Flight cancellations and airline alliances: Empirical evidence from Europe," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 90-101.
    19. Vildan Özkır & Mahmud Sami Özgür, 2021. "Two-Phase Heuristic Algorithm for Integrated Airline Fleet Assignment and Routing Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-10, June.
    20. Shengzhi Shao & Hanif D. Sherali & Mohamed Haouari, 2017. "A Novel Model and Decomposition Approach for the Integrated Airline Fleet Assignment, Aircraft Routing, and Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 233-249, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:51:y:2017:i:1:p:88-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.