IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v5y1994i4p528-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Overcommitment in Corporate Acquisition Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela R. Haunschild

    (University of Wisconsin--Madison)

  • Alison Davis-Blake

    (Department of Management, CBA 4.202, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • Mark Fichman

    (Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

Abstract

This study investigates a problem that may occur during corporate acquisitions: managers who become committed to acquiring a particular target firm, regardless of benefit to the acquiring firm. Three factors that may create commitment to a particular target were investigated: (1) personal responsibility for the decision to acquire the target, (2) competition for the target, and (3) whether the decision to acquire the target is public. These factors were varied in a simulated corporate acquisition where participants began an acquisition and then were given negative information about the target. They were later given the choice of continuing with the acquisition or withdrawing and investing elsewhere. As predicted, personal responsibility for the decision to acquire the target, competition for the target, and a public decision context all increased participants' commitment to acquiring the target, despite the negative information. Participant work and acquisition experience did not affect these results.Field studies of acquisitions suggest that commitment to acquiring a specific target occurs during the acquisition process. Since the acquisition process is a potentially important determinant of acquisition outcomes, commitment to targets has negative implications for these outcomes. This study adds a systematic empirical investigation of the determinants of commitment in acquisition situations. Studies in nonacquisition settings have demonstrated that personal responsibility affects commitment. However, the presence of competition has not previously been studied, and a public decision context has only been studied in a limited way. These are important factors in generating commitment to acquisitions. These results suggest that managers should recognize that overcommitment can and does occur during acquisitions. Further, the factors that cause overcommitment to targets have implications for managers who wish to avoid this commitment. Activities that should help avoid overcommitment problems include assigning target choice and due diligence activities to different individuals, and limiting news of impending acquisitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela R. Haunschild & Alison Davis-Blake & Mark Fichman, 1994. "Managerial Overcommitment in Corporate Acquisition Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 528-540, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:5:y:1994:i:4:p:528-540
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.4.528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.528
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.5.4.528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Weber & Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß & Lars Schweizer, 2019. "Improving the M&A Decision-Making Process: Learning from Serial Acquirers," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 71(3), pages 295-342, August.
    2. Gilles Guieu, 1999. "Processus de prise de contrôle et changement organisationnel:la diversité des relations," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 2(2), pages 71-95, June.
    3. Kalin D. Kolev & Jerayr (John) Haleblian, 2018. "When firms learn from prior acquisition experience," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Anne-Sophie Thelisson & Olivier Meier, 2022. "Managerial biases during a merger process in a government-controlled organization," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1315-1338, December.
    5. Katz, Jeffrey P. & Katz, Jeffey P. & Simanek, Astrid & Townsend, James B., 1997. "Corporate mergers and acquisitions: One more wave to consider," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 32-40.
    6. Meglio, Olimpia & King, David R. & Risberg, Annette, 2017. "Speed in acquisitions: A managerial framework," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 415-425.
    7. Twardawski, Torsten & Kind, Axel, 2023. "Board overconfidence in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Eero Vaara & Philippe Monin, 2010. "A Recursive Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organizational Action in Mergers and Acquisitions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 3-22, February.
    9. Shavin Malhotra & Pengcheng Zhu & Taco H. Reus, 2015. "Anchoring on the acquisition premium decisions of others," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(12), pages 1866-1876, December.
    10. Rama Krishna Reddy & Frances Fabian, 2020. "Information Asymmetry and Host Country Institutions in Cross-Border Acquisitions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 909-938, December.
    11. Aseem Kaul & Brian Wu, 2016. "A capabilities-based perspective on target selection in acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1220-1239, July.
    12. Hatoum, Khalil & Moussu, Christophe & Gillet, Roland, 2022. "CEO overconfidence: Towards a new measure," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Jean-Louis Denis & Geneviève Dompierre & Ann Langley & Linda Rouleau, 2011. "Escalating Indecision: Between Reification and Strategic Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 225-244, February.
    14. Shi, Wei & King, David R. & Connelly, Brian L., 2021. "Closing the deal: Managerial response to short sellers following M&A announcement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 188-199.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:5:y:1994:i:4:p:528-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.