IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v4y1993i3p345-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Legalistic Organization: Definitions, Dimensions, and Dilemmas

Author

Listed:
  • Sim B. Sitkin

    (Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • Robert J. Bies

    (School of Business Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057)

Abstract

The worse the society, the more law there will be. In Hell, there will be nothing but law, and due process will be meticulously observed.Grant Gilmore ( The Ages of American Law 1977, p. 111)

Suggested Citation

  • Sim B. Sitkin & Robert J. Bies, 1993. "The Legalistic Organization: Definitions, Dimensions, and Dilemmas," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 345-351, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:345-351
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.4.3.345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.345
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.4.3.345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronald Sims, 2009. "Toward a Better Understanding of Organizational Efforts to Rebuild Reputation Following an Ethical Scandal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 453-472, December.
    2. Hennequin, Emilie, 2020. "What motivates internal whistleblowing? A typology adapted to the French context," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 804-813.
    3. Seok-Woo Kwon & Jerayr Haleblian & John Hagedoorn, 2016. "In country we trust? National trust and the governance of international R&D alliances," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(7), pages 807-829, September.
    4. Cugueró-Escofet, Natalia & Rosanas, Josep Maria, 2013. "Social Dynamics of Justice: How the Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Justice Interplay With Formal and Informal Elements of Management Control Systems," IESE Research Papers D/1073, IESE Business School.
    5. Oussama Ouriemmi, 2023. "The Legalistic Organizational Response to Whistleblowers’ Disclosures in a Scandal: Law Without Justice?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 17-35, November.
    6. Ruthanne Huising & Susan S. Silbey, 2021. "Accountability infrastructures: Pragmatic compliance inside organizations," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 40-62, November.
    7. Ben Khaled, Wafa & Gérard, Benoît & Farjaudon, Anne-Laure, 2022. "Analysis of the political and identity dynamics of a dominant mode of control: The case of business ethics control and its legalization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Laurent Cappelletti & Nicolas Dufourg, 2016. "Solvabilité II, quels apports pour la gouvernance des risques ? Résultats d'une recherche-intervention au sein d'une mutuelle française," Post-Print hal-01901188, HAL.
    9. Marc Fréchet & Laurent Bertriandas, 2011. "La performance judiciaire de la firme:une étude exploratoire du succès des entreprises devant le conseil des prud'hommes," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(1), pages 131-158., March.
    10. James J. Lavelle & Robert Folger & Jennifer G. Manegold, 2016. "Delivering Bad News: How Procedural Unfairness Affects Messengers’ Distancing and Refusals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 43-55, June.
    11. Marta Hereźniak & Justyna Anders-Morawska, 2021. "Public value-driven place branding. The way forward?," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 65-77, March.
    12. Vlaar, P.W.L. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2006. "On the Evolution of Trust, Distrust, and Formal Coordination and Control in Interorganizational Relationships: Towards an Integrative Framework," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-035-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:345-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.