IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v64y2016i1p167-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Newsvendor under Demand Ambiguity: Combining Data with Moment and Tail Information

Author

Listed:
  • Soroush Saghafian

    (Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts)

  • Brian Tomlin

    (Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire)

Abstract

Operations managers do not typically have full information about the demand distribution. Recognizing this, data-driven approaches have been proposed in which the manager has no information beyond the evolving history of demand observations. In practice, managers often have some partial information about the demand distribution in addition to demand observations. We consider a repeated newsvendor setting, and propose a maximum-entropy based technique, termed Second Order Belief Maximum Entropy (SOBME), which allows the manager to effectively combine demand observations with distributional information in the form of bounds on the moments or tails. In the proposed approach, the decision maker forms a belief about possible demand distributions, and dynamically updates it over time using the available data and the partial distributional information. We derive a closed-form solution for the updating mechanism, and highlight that it generalizes the traditional Bayesian mechanism with an exponential modifier that accommodates partial distributional information. We prove the proposed approach is (weakly) consistent under some technical regularity conditions and we analytically characterize its rate of convergence. We provide an analytical upper bound for the newsvendor’s cost of ambiguity, i.e., the extra per-period cost incurred because of ambiguity, under SOBME, and show that it approaches zero quite quickly. Numerical experiments demonstrate that SOBME performs very well. We find that it can be very beneficial to incorporate partial distributional information when deciding stocking quantities, and that information in the form of tighter moment bounds is typically more valuable than information in the form of tighter ambiguity sets. Moreover, unlike pure data-driven approaches, SOBME is fairly robust to the newsvendor quantile. Our results also show that SOBME quickly detects and responds to hidden changes in the unknown true distribution. We also extend our analysis to consider ambiguity aversion, and develop theoretical and numerical results for the ambiguity-averse, repeated newsvendor setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Soroush Saghafian & Brian Tomlin, 2016. "The Newsvendor under Demand Ambiguity: Combining Data with Moment and Tail Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 167-185, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:167-185
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2015.1454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2015.1454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Klibanoff & Massimo Marinacci & Sujoy Mukerji, 2005. "A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(6), pages 1849-1892, November.
    2. Katy S. Azoury, 1985. "Bayes Solution to Dynamic Inventory Models Under Unknown Demand Distribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(9), pages 1150-1160, September.
    3. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dick den Hertog & Anja De Waegenaere & Bertrand Melenberg & Gijs Rennen, 2013. "Robust Solutions of Optimization Problems Affected by Uncertain Probabilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 341-357, April.
    4. Klibanoff, Peter & Marinacci, Massimo & Mukerji, Sujoy, 2009. "Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 930-976, May.
    5. Costis Maglaras & Serkan Eren, 2015. "A Maximum Entropy Joint Demand Estimation and Capacity Control Policy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(3), pages 438-450, March.
    6. Brian Tomlin, 2009. "Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 192-209, August.
    7. Andersson, Jonas & Jörnsten, Kurt & Nonås, Sigrid Lise & Sandal, Leif & Ubøe, Jan, 2013. "A maximum entropy approach to the newsvendor problem with partial information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 190-200.
    8. Retsef Levi & Georgia Perakis & Joline Uichanco, 2015. "The Data-Driven Newsvendor Problem: New Bounds and Insights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1294-1306, December.
    9. Ioana Popescu, 2007. "Robust Mean-Covariance Solutions for Stochastic Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 98-112, February.
    10. Gregory A. Godfrey & Warren B. Powell, 2001. "An Adaptive, Distribution-Free Algorithm for the Newsvendor Problem with Censored Demands, with Applications to Inventory and Distribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1101-1112, August.
    11. Woonghee Tim Huh & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2009. "A Nonparametric Asymptotic Analysis of Inventory Planning with Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 103-123, February.
    12. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    13. Retsef Levi & Robin O. Roundy & David B. Shmoys, 2007. "Provably Near-Optimal Sampling-Based Policies for Stochastic Inventory Control Models," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 821-839, November.
    14. Martin A. Lariviere & Evan L. Porteus, 1999. "Stalking Information: Bayesian Inventory Management with Unobserved Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 346-363, March.
    15. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    16. Woonghee Tim Huh & Retsef Levi & Paat Rusmevichientong & James B. Orlin, 2011. "Adaptive Data-Driven Inventory Control with Censored Demand Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimator," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 929-941, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bajgiran, Amirsaman H. & Mardikoraem, Mahsa & Soofi, Ehsan S., 2021. "Maximum entropy distributions with quantile information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 196-209.
    2. Asadi, Majid & Ebrahimi, Nader & Soofi, Ehsan S., 2018. "Optimal hazard models based on partial information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 723-733.
    3. Rasouli, Mohammad & Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Robust Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes," Working Paper Series rwp18-027, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Karthik Natarajan & Melvyn Sim & Joline Uichanco, 2018. "Asymmetry and Ambiguity in Newsvendor Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3146-3167, July.
    5. Adam Fleischhacker & Pak-Wing Fok & Mokshay Madiman & Nan Wu, 2023. "A Closed-Form EVSI Expression for a Multinomial Data-Generating Process," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 73-84, March.
    6. Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Ambiguous partially observable Markov decision processes: Structural results and applications," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-35.
    7. Erkip, Nesim Kohen, 2023. "Can accessing much data reshape the theory? Inventory theory under the challenge of data-driven systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 949-959.
    8. Anh Ninh, 2021. "Robust newsvendor problems with compound Poisson demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 327-338, July.
    9. Farzad Alavi Fard & Firmin Doko Tchatoka & Sivagowry Sriananthakumar, 2021. "Maximum Entropy Evaluation of Asymptotic Hedging Error under a Generalised Jump-Diffusion Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Sylvia Mardiana, 2023. "Gasoline Policy Simulation to Increase Responsiveness Using System Dynamics: A Case Study of Indonesia’s Gasoline Downstream Supply Chain," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 109-118, November.
    11. Boylan, John E. & Babai, M. Zied, 2022. "Estimating the cumulative distribution function of lead-time demand using bootstrapping with and without replacement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Shaojian Qu & Yongyi Zhou, 2017. "A Study of The Effect of Demand Uncertainty for Low-Carbon Products Using a Newsvendor Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Berndt Jesenko & Christian Schlögl, 2021. "The effect of web of science subject categories on clustering: the case of data-driven methods in business and economic sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6785-6801, August.
    14. Soroush Saghafian & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2016. "Compensating for Dynamic Supply Disruptions: Backup Flexibility Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 390-405, April.
    15. Bai, Qingguo & Xu, Jianteng & Gong, Yeming & Chauhan, Satyaveer S., 2022. "Robust decisions for regulated sustainable manufacturing with partial demand information: Mandatory emission capacity versus emission tax," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 874-893.
    16. Saghafian, Soroush & Tomlin, Brian & Biller, Stephan, 2018. "The Internet of Things and Information Fusion: Who Talks to Who?," Working Paper Series rwp18-009, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    17. Bao, Xing & Diabat, Ali & Zheng, Zhongliang, 2020. "An ambiguous manager's disruption decisions with insufficient data in recovery phase," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Heng Du & Tiaojun Xiao, 2019. "Pricing Strategies for Competing Adaptive Retailers Facing Complex Consumer Behavior: Agent-based Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1909-1939, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cong Shi & Weidong Chen & Izak Duenyas, 2016. "Technical Note—Nonparametric Data-Driven Algorithms for Multiproduct Inventory Systems with Censored Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 362-370, April.
    2. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao & Cong Shi, 2021. "Nonparametric Learning Algorithms for Joint Pricing and Inventory Control with Lost Sales and Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 726-756, May.
    3. Satya S. Malladi & Alan L. Erera & Chelsea C. White, 2023. "Inventory control with modulated demand and a partially observed modulation process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 343-369, February.
    4. Hao Yuan & Qi Luo & Cong Shi, 2021. "Marrying Stochastic Gradient Descent with Bandits: Learning Algorithms for Inventory Systems with Fixed Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6089-6115, October.
    5. Gah-Yi Ban, 2020. "Confidence Intervals for Data-Driven Inventory Policies with Demand Censoring," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 309-326, March.
    6. Gah-Yi Ban & Cynthia Rudin, 2019. "The Big Data Newsvendor: Practical Insights from Machine Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 90-108, January.
    7. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao, 2020. "Dynamic Inventory Control with Stockout Substitution and Demand Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5108-5127, November.
    8. Woonghee Tim Huh & Retsef Levi & Paat Rusmevichientong & James B. Orlin, 2011. "Adaptive Data-Driven Inventory Control with Censored Demand Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimator," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 929-941, August.
    9. Woonghee Tim Huh & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2009. "A Nonparametric Asymptotic Analysis of Inventory Planning with Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 103-123, February.
    10. Rui Wang & Xiao Yan & Chuanjin Zhu, 2023. "Solving a Distribution-Free Multi-Period Newsvendor Problem With Advance Purchase Discount via an Online Ordering Solution," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    11. Erkip, Nesim Kohen, 2023. "Can accessing much data reshape the theory? Inventory theory under the challenge of data-driven systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 949-959.
    12. Jiri Chod & Mihalis G. Markakis & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2021. "On the Learning Benefits of Resource Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6513-6528, October.
    13. Gen Sakoda & Hideki Takayasu & Misako Takayasu, 2019. "Data Science Solutions for Retail Strategy to Reduce Waste Keeping High Profit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Andrew F. Siegel & Michael R. Wagner, 2021. "Profit Estimation Error in the Newsvendor Model Under a Parametric Demand Distribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4863-4879, August.
    15. Aditya Jain & Nils Rudi & Tong Wang, 2015. "Demand Estimation and Ordering Under Censoring: Stock-Out Timing Is (Almost) All You Need," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 134-150, February.
    16. Retsef Levi & Georgia Perakis & Joline Uichanco, 2015. "The Data-Driven Newsvendor Problem: New Bounds and Insights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1294-1306, December.
    17. Anyan Qi & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Amitabh Sinha, 2017. "Capacity Investment with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 145-164, February.
    18. Adam Fleischhacker & Pak-Wing Fok & Mokshay Madiman & Nan Wu, 2023. "A Closed-Form EVSI Expression for a Multinomial Data-Generating Process," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 73-84, March.
    19. Lin An & Andrew A. Li & Benjamin Moseley & R. Ravi, 2023. "The Nonstationary Newsvendor with (and without) Predictions," Papers 2305.07993, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    20. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:167-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.