IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v60y2012i5p1125-1141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Performance of the Long Chain and Sparse Designs in Process Flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • David Simchi-Levi

    (Engineering Systems Division, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and the Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Yehua Wei

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

The long chain has been an important concept in the design of flexible processes. This design concept, as well as other sparse designs, have been applied by the automotive and other industries as a way to increase flexibility in order to better match available capacities with variable demands. Numerous empirical studies have validated the effectiveness of these designs. However, there is little theory that explains the effectiveness of the long chain, except when the system size is large, i.e., by applying an asymptotic analysis.Our attempt in this paper is to develop a theory that explains the effectiveness of long chain designs for finite size systems. First, we uncover a fundamental property of long chains, supermodularity, that serves as an important building block in our analysis. This property is used to show that the marginal benefit, i.e., the increase in expected sales, increases as the long chain is constructed, and the largest benefit is always achieved when the chain is closed by adding the last arc to the system. Then, supermodularity is used to show that the performance of the long chain is characterized by the difference between the performances of two open chains. This characterization immediately leads to the optimality of the long chain among 2-flexibility designs. Finally, under independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) demand, this characterization gives rise to three developments: (i) an effective algorithm to compute the performances of long chains using only matrix multiplications; (ii) a result that the gap between the fill rate of full flexibility and that of the long chain increases with system size, thus implying that the effectiveness of the long chain relative to full flexibility increases as the number of products decreases; (iii) a risk-pooling result implying that the fill rate of a long chain increases with the number of products, but this increase converges to zero exponentially fast.

Suggested Citation

  • David Simchi-Levi & Yehua Wei, 2012. "Understanding the Performance of the Long Chain and Sparse Designs in Process Flexibility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1125-1141, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:60:y:2012:i:5:p:1125-1141
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1120.1081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1120.1081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mabel C. Chou & Geoffrey A. Chua & Chung-Piaw Teo & Huan Zheng, 2011. "Process Flexibility Revisited: The Graph Expander and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1090-1105, October.
    2. Simchi-Levi, David, 2010. "Operation Rules: Delivering Customer Value through Flexible Operations," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262525151, December.
    3. Seyed M. Iravani & Mark P. Van Oyen & Katharine T. Sims, 2005. "Structural Flexibility: A New Perspective on the Design of Manufacturing and Service Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 151-166, February.
    4. Achal Bassamboo & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2010. "Optimal Flexibility Configurations in Newsvendor Networks: Going Beyond Chaining and Pairing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1285-1303, August.
    5. Ebru K. Bish & Ana Muriel & Stephan Biller, 2005. "Managing Flexible Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 167-180, February.
    6. Suri Gurumurthi & Saif Benjaafar, 2004. "Modeling and analysis of flexible queueing systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(5), pages 755-782, August.
    7. Wallace J. Hopp & Eylem Tekin & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2004. "Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 83-98, January.
    8. Rodney B. Wallace & Ward Whitt, 2005. "A Staffing Algorithm for Call Centers with Skill-Based Routing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 276-294, August.
    9. Ana Muriel & Anand Somasundaram & Yongmei Zhang, 2006. "Impact of Partial Manufacturing Flexibility on Production Variability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 192-205, April.
    10. Stephen C. Graves & Brian T. Tomlin, 2003. "Process Flexibility in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(7), pages 907-919, July.
    11. William C. Jordan & Stephen C. Graves, 1995. "Principles on the Benefits of Manufacturing Process Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 577-594, April.
    12. Frieda Granot & Arthur F. Veinott, 1985. "Substitutes, Complements and Ripples in Network Flows," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 471-497, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mabel C. Chou & Geoffrey A. Chua & Huan Zheng, 2014. "On the Performance of Sparse Process Structures in Partial Postponement Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 348-365, April.
    2. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Daniel Letourneau & Benjamin G. Potter, 2022. "Sparse flexible design: a machine learning approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1066-1116, December.
    3. Xi Chen & Jiawei Zhang & Yuan Zhou, 2015. "Optimal Sparse Designs for Process Flexibility via Probabilistic Expanders," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1159-1176, October.
    4. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Douglas Fearing, 2019. "Process Flexibility in Baseball: The Value of Positional Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1642-1666, April.
    5. Tianhu Deng & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2013. "Process Flexibility Design in Unbalanced Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 24-32, April.
    6. Zhen Xu & Hailun Zhang & Jiheng Zhang & Rachel Q. Zhang, 2020. "Online Demand Fulfillment Under Limited Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4667-4685, October.
    7. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Yehua Wei & Jiawei Zhang, 2016. "Sparse Process Flexibility Designs: Is the Long Chain Really Optimal?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 416-431, April.
    8. Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2015. "Process Flexibility: A Distribution-Free Bound on the Performance of k -Chain," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 555-571, June.
    9. Rujeerapaiboon, Napat & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhu, Dan, 2023. "Resilience of long chain under disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 597-615.
    10. Arash Asadpour & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2020. "Online Resource Allocation with Limited Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 642-666, February.
    11. Mabel C. Chou & Geoffrey A. Chua & Chung-Piaw Teo & Huan Zheng, 2010. "Design for Process Flexibility: Efficiency of the Long Chain and Sparse Structure," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 43-58, February.
    12. Cong Shi & Yehua Wei & Yuan Zhong, 2019. "Process Flexibility for Multiperiod Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1300-1320, September.
    13. Dipankar Bose & A. K. Chatterjee & Samir Barman, 2016. "Towards dominant flexibility configurations in strategic capacity planning under demand uncertainty," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 604-619, September.
    14. Mabel C. Chou & Geoffrey A. Chua & Chung-Piaw Teo & Huan Zheng, 2011. "Process Flexibility Revisited: The Graph Expander and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1090-1105, October.
    15. David Simchi-Levi & Yehua Wei, 2015. "Worst-Case Analysis of Process Flexibility Designs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 166-185, February.
    16. Achal Bassamboo & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2012. "A Little Flexibility Is All You Need: On the Asymptotic Value of Flexible Capacity in Parallel Queuing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1423-1435, December.
    17. Soroush Saghafian & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2016. "Compensating for Dynamic Supply Disruptions: Backup Flexibility Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 390-405, April.
    18. Eser Kırkızlar & Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan, 2012. "Flexible Servers in Understaffed Tandem Lines," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 761-777, July.
    19. Schneider, Michael & Grahl, Jörn & Francas, David & Vigo, Daniele, 2013. "A problem-adjusted genetic algorithm for flexibility design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 56-65.
    20. Fiorotto, Diego Jacinto & Jans, Raf & Alexandre de Araujo, Silvio, 2018. "Process flexibility and the chaining principle in lot sizing problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 244-263.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:60:y:2012:i:5:p:1125-1141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.