IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v57y2009i1p170-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connectivity Upgrade Models for Survivable Network Design

Author

Listed:
  • Anantaram Balakrishnan

    (McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

  • Prakash Mirchandani

    (Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260)

  • Harihara Prasad Natarajan

    (School of Business Administration, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124)

Abstract

Disruptions in infrastructure networks to transport material, energy, and information can have serious economic, and even catastrophic, consequences. Since these networks require enormous investments, network service providers emphasize both survivability and cost effectiveness in their topological design decisions. This paper addresses the survivable network design problem, a core model incorporating the cost and redundancy trade-offs facing network planners. Using a novel connectivity upgrade strategy, we develop several families of inequalities to strengthen a multicommodity flow-based formulation for the problem, and show that some of these inequalities are facet defining. By increasing the linear programming lower bound, the valid inequalities not only lead to better performance guarantees for heuristic solutions, but also accelerate exact and approximate solution methods. We also consider a heuristic strategy that sequentially rounds the fractional values, starting with the linear programming solution to our strong model. Extensive computational tests confirm that the valid inequalities, added via a cutting plane algorithm, and the heuristic procedure are very effective, and their performance is robust to changes in the network dimensions and connectivity structure. Our solution approach generates tight lower and upper bounds with average gaps that are less than 1.2% for various problem sizes and connectivity requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Anantaram Balakrishnan & Prakash Mirchandani & Harihara Prasad Natarajan, 2009. "Connectivity Upgrade Models for Survivable Network Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 170-186, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:57:y:2009:i:1:p:170-186
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0579
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1080.0579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Thomas L. Magnanti & Prakash Mirchandani, 1994. "A Dual-Based Algorithm for Multi-Level Network Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 567-581, May.
    2. Martin Grötschel & Clyde L. Monma & Mechthild Stoer, 1992. "Computational Results with a Cutting Plane Algorithm for Designing Communication Networks with Low-Connectivity Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 309-330, April.
    3. M. Grötschel & C. L. Monma & M. Stoer, 1995. "Polyhedral and Computational Investigations for Designing Communication Networks with High Survivability Requirements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 1012-1024, December.
    4. Geir Dahl & Mechthild Stoer, 1998. "A Cutting Plane Algorithm for Multicommodity Survivable Network Design Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Thomas L. Magnanti & Joel S. Sokol & Yi Wang, 2002. "Spare-Capacity Assignment For Line Restoration Using a Single-Facility Type," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 617-635, August.
    6. A. Balakrishnan & T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1989. "A Dual-Ascent Procedure for Large-Scale Uncapacitated Network Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 716-740, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oya Ekin Karaşan & A. Ridha Mahjoub & Onur Özkök & Hande Yaman, 2014. "Survivability in Hierarchical Telecommunications Networks Under Dual Homing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Nima Haghighi & S. Kiavash Fayyaz & Xiaoyue Cathy Liu & Tony H. Grubesic & Ran Wei, 2018. "A Multi-Scenario Probabilistic Simulation Approach for Critical Transportation Network Risk Assessment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 181-203, March.
    3. Agarwal, Y.K. & Venkateshan, Prahalad, 2014. "Survivable network design with shared-protection routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 836-845.
    4. Yogesh Agarwal, 2013. "Design of Survivable Networks Using Three- and Four-Partition Facets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 199-213, February.
    5. Ghavami, Seyed Morsal, 2019. "Multi-criteria spatial decision support system for identifying strategic roads in disaster situations," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 23-36.
    6. Naga V. C. Gudapati & Enrico Malaguti & Michele Monaci, 2022. "Network Design with Service Requirements: Scaling-up the Size of Solvable Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2571-2582, September.
    7. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Gang Li & Prakash Mirchandani, 2017. "Optimal Network Design with End-to-End Service Requirements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 729-750, June.
    8. Balakrishnan, Anantaram & Banciu, Mihai & Glowacka, Karolina & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2013. "Hierarchical approach for survivable network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 223-235.
    9. Yupo Chan, 2015. "Network Throughput and Reliability: Preventing Hazards and Attacks Through Gaming—Part I: Modeling," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Kjell Hausken & Jun Zhuang (ed.), Game Theoretic Analysis of Congestion, Safety and Security, edition 127, pages 113-139, Springer.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yogesh Agarwal, 2013. "Design of Survivable Networks Using Three- and Four-Partition Facets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 199-213, February.
    2. van de Leensel, R.L.J.M. & Flippo, O.E. & Koster, Arie M.C.A. & Kolen, A.W.J., 1996. "A dynamic programming algorithm for the local access network expansion problem," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. Yogesh K. Agarwal, 2002. "Design of Capacitated Multicommodity Networks with Multiple Facilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 333-344, April.
    4. Garg, Manish & Smith, J. Cole, 2008. "Models and algorithms for the design of survivable multicommodity flow networks with general failure scenarios," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1057-1071, December.
    5. Kennington, Jeffery L. & Olinick, Eli V. & Spiride, Gheorghe, 2007. "Basic mathematical programming models for capacity allocation in mesh-based survivable networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 629-644, December.
    6. Flippo, Olaf E. & Kolen, Antoon W. J. & Koster, Arie M. C. A. & van de Leensel, Robert L. M. J., 2000. "A dynamic programming algorithm for the local access telecommunication network expansion problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 189-202, November.
    7. M-G Yoon & J Current, 2008. "The hub location and network design problem with fixed and variable arc costs: formulation and dual-based solution heuristic," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(1), pages 80-89, January.
    8. Chardy, M. & Costa, M.-C. & Faye, A. & Trampont, M., 2012. "Optimizing splitter and fiber location in a multilevel optical FTTH network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 430-440.
    9. Desai, Jitamitra & Sen, Suvrajeet, 2010. "A global optimization algorithm for reliable network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-8, January.
    10. Ortiz-Astorquiza, Camilo & Contreras, Ivan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2018. "Multi-level facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 791-805.
    11. Melkote, Sanjay & Daskin, Mark S., 2001. "Capacitated facility location/network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 481-495, March.
    12. Rafael Epstein & Andrés Weintraub & Pedro Sapunar & Enrique Nieto & Julian B. Sessions & John Sessions & Fernando Bustamante & Hugo Musante, 2006. "A Combinatorial Heuristic Approach for Solving Real-Size Machinery Location and Road Design Problems in Forestry Planning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1017-1027, December.
    13. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel, 2000. "Service network design in freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 272-288, April.
    14. Abdolsalam Ghaderi, 2015. "Heuristic Algorithms for Solving an Integrated Dynamic Center Facility Location - Network Design Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 43-69, March.
    15. Masashi Miyagawa, 2009. "Optimal hierarchical system of a grid road network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 349-361, November.
    16. M. Didi Biha & A.R. Mahjoub, 2000. "Steiner k-Edge Connected Subgraph Polyhedra," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 131-144, March.
    17. Laporte, G. & Mesa, J.A. & Ortega, F.A. & Perea, F., 2011. "Planning rapid transit networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 95-104, September.
    18. Ljubić, Ivana & Mutzel, Petra & Zey, Bernd, 2017. "Stochastic survivable network design problems: Theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 333-348.
    19. Contreras, Ivan & Fernández, Elena & Reinelt, Gerhard, 2012. "Minimizing the maximum travel time in a combined model of facility location and network design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 847-860.
    20. M. Gisela Bardossy & S. Raghavan, 2010. "Dual-Based Local Search for the Connected Facility Location and Related Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 584-602, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:57:y:2009:i:1:p:170-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.