IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v48y2000i3p408-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjustment Strategies for a Fixed Delivery Contract

Author

Listed:
  • Kamran Moinzadeh

    (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Steven Nahmias

    (Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

Abstract

We consider a long term contractual agreement between buyer and seller in which Q units are delivered to the buyer at regular time intervals. It must be true that the delivery quantity, Q , is less than the mean demand per period. In order to manage the inventory, the buyer has the option of adjusting the delivery quantity upwards just prior to a delivery, but must pay a premium to do so. Demand is assumed random, and we model the system in a continuous review setting. We show that the equations one must solve to find optimal adjustment strategies are intractable. A diffusion approximation is developed which when coupled with the solution to an even simpler deterministic version of the problem yields very simple but effective approximations. Extensive computations are included to compare the performance of the optimal and approximate policies. We also empirically derive a formula for computing Q whose accuracy is established computationally. We prove that the fixed delivery contract results in lower variance of orders to the seller. We also include a computational study to find the unit cost discount that equalizes the expected costs for the fixed delivery contract and the base stock contract for a large parameter set.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamran Moinzadeh & Steven Nahmias, 2000. "Adjustment Strategies for a Fixed Delivery Contract," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 408-423, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:3:p:408-423
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.3.408.12435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.3.408.12435
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.48.3.408.12435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narendra Agrawal & Steven Nahmias, 1997. "Rationalization Of The Supplier Base In The Presence Of Yield Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 291-308, September.
    2. Ravi Anupindi & Ram Akella, 1993. "Diversification Under Supply Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(8), pages 944-963, August.
    3. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    4. A. A. Tsay & W. S. Lovejoy, 1999. "Quantity Flexibility Contracts and Supply Chain Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 89-111.
    5. Ranga V. Ramasesh & J. Keith Ord & Jack C. Hayya & Andrew Pan, 1991. "Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time (s, Q) Inventory Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 428-443, April.
    6. Andy A. Tsay, 1999. "The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(10), pages 1339-1358, October.
    7. Kamran Moinzadeh & Steven Nahmias, 1988. "A Continuous Review Model for an Inventory System with Two Supply Modes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 761-773, June.
    8. Yigal Gerchak & Mahmut Parlar, 1990. "Yield randomness, cost tradeoffs, and diversification in the EOQ model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 341-354, June.
    9. Kamran Moinzadeh & Hau L. Lee, 1989. "Approximate Order Quantities and Reorder Points for Inventory Systems Where Orders Arrive in Two Shipments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 277-287, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narendra Agrawal & Steven Nahmias, 1997. "Rationalization Of The Supplier Base In The Presence Of Yield Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 291-308, September.
    2. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    3. Bin Zhang & Zekai Lai & Qiangqiang Wang, 2021. "Multi-product dual sourcing problem with limited capacities," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2055-2075, September.
    4. Sunil Chopra & Gilles Reinhardt & Usha Mohan, 2007. "The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(5), pages 544-555, August.
    5. Gel, Esma S. & Salman, F. Sibel, 2022. "Dynamic ordering decisions with approximate learning of supply yield uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Bo He & Yange Yang, 2018. "Mitigating supply risk: an approach with quantity flexibility procurement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 599-617, December.
    7. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    8. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    9. Bellantuono, Nicola & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo & Tang, Christopher S., 2009. "The implications of joint adoption of revenue sharing and advance booking discount programs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 383-394, October.
    10. Qiang Gong, 2008. "Optimal Buy-Back Contracts with Asymmetric Information," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 23-47.
    11. Seung Hwan Jung, 2020. "Offshore versus Onshore Sourcing: Quick Response, Random Yield, and Competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 750-766, March.
    12. Ahiska, S. Sebnem & Appaji, Samyuktha R. & King, Russell E. & Warsing, Donald P., 2013. "A Markov decision process-based policy characterization approach for a stochastic inventory control problem with unreliable sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 485-496.
    13. Burke, Gerard J. & Carrillo, Janice E. & Vakharia, Asoo J., 2007. "Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 95-112, October.
    14. Cvsa, Viswanath & Gilbert, Stephen M., 2002. "Strategic commitment versus postponement in a two-tier supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 526-543, September.
    15. David G. Lawson & Evan L. Porteus, 2000. "Multistage Inventory Management with Expediting," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 878-893, December.
    16. Yehuda Bassok & Ravi Anupindi, 2008. "Analysis of supply contracts with commitments and flexibility," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(5), pages 459-477, August.
    17. Minner, Stefan, 2003. "Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 265-279, January.
    18. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    19. Yong He & Xuan Zhao, 2016. "Contracts and coordination: Supply chains with uncertain demand and supply," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(4), pages 305-319, June.
    20. Albert Y. Ha, 2001. "Supplier‐buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(1), pages 41-64, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:3:p:408-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.