IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v37y1991i4p428-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time (s, Q) Inventory Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ranga V. Ramasesh

    (M. J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 76129)

  • J. Keith Ord

    (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Jack C. Hayya

    (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Andrew Pan

    (National Central University, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

When supply lead times are uncertain, the simultaneous procurement from two sources offers savings in inventory holding and shortage costs. Economies are achieved if these savings outweigh the increase in ordering costs. In this paper we analyze dual sourcing in the context of the "reorder point, order quantity" inventory model with constant demand and stochastic lead times and compare it with single sourcing. Two cases are studied, using the uniform and the exponential distributions, which may be thought of as two extreme ways of representing stochastic lead times. In our two-vendor model, the order quantity is split equally between the two vendors and the split orders are placed simultaneously when the inventory position reaches the reorder level. A comparison of the total expected costs suggests that when the uncertainty in the lead times is high and the ordering costs are low, dual sourcing could be cost effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranga V. Ramasesh & J. Keith Ord & Jack C. Hayya & Andrew Pan, 1991. "Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time (s, Q) Inventory Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 428-443, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:4:p:428-443
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.37.4.428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.4.428
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.37.4.428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:4:p:428-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.