IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v44y1996i1p7-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Planning for Aluminum Tubes: An Engineering-Operations Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Anantaram Balakrishnan

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts)

  • Stuart Brown

    (Failure Analysis Associates, Framingham, Massachusetts)

Abstract

Metal-forming operations such as extrusion, drawing, and rolling offer many opportunities for operations improvement through better process understanding and improved planning practices. This paper addresses medium-term planning issues in aluminum tube manufacturing operations. First, we identify certain distinctive characteristics—the inherent process flexibility, close inter-dependence between successive stages, and economies of scale—of metal-forming operations, and identify performance trade-offs across stages. To exploit the strategic potential of process planning, it must be closely coupled with process engineering efforts, and must simultaneously consider the facility's entire product mix. In contrast, current process engineering efforts are mainly reactive, focusing on fixing problems at individual operations and with less emphasis on the interactions between successive stages. Similarly, planning activities are incremental, considering only individual products or orders one at a time rather than the entire range of product sizes to be manufactured. By working together, planners and engineers can develop effective process plans that exploit process capability, and adopt proactive process improvement strategies that focus on critical constraints. We describe a medium-term planning model to select standard extrusion sizes, illustrate the close linkages between planning and engineering activities, and identify research opportunities spanning management science, materials science, and mechanical engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Anantaram Balakrishnan & Stuart Brown, 1996. "Process Planning for Aluminum Tubes: An Engineering-Operations Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 7-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:44:y:1996:i:1:p:7-20
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.44.1.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.44.1.7
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.44.1.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Denton & Diwakar Gupta & Keith Jawahir, 2003. "Managing Increasing Product Variety at Integrated Steel Mills," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 41-53, April.
    2. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Joseph Geunes, 2003. "Production Planning with Flexible Product Specifications: An Application to Specialty Steel Manufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 94-112, February.
    3. Edie Schmidt & Maqbool Dada & James Ward & Duane Adams, 2001. "Using Cyclic Planning to Manage Capacity at ALCOA," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 16-27, June.
    4. Zheng, Huan-yu & Wang, Ling, 2015. "Reduction of carbon emissions and project makespan by a Pareto-based estimation of distribution algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 421-432.
    5. Kerkkanen, Annastiina, 2007. "Determining semi-finished products to be stocked when changing the MTS-MTO policy: Case of a steel mill," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 111-118, July.
    6. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Joseph Geunes, 2000. "Requirements Planning with Substitutions: Exploiting Bill-of-Materials Flexibility in Production Planning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 166-185, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:44:y:1996:i:1:p:7-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.