IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v30y1982i5p982-997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strength of Preference and Risky Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Rakesh Kumar Sarin

    (University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California)

Abstract

This paper provides conditions under which a utility function under risk can be legitimately interpreted to measure strength of preference between consequences. These conditions require that if a decision maker regards the preference difference between acts a and b to be the same as the preference difference between acts a ′ and b ′ for every state of the world, then the preference difference between a and b should be regarded as equivalent to the preference difference between a ′ and b ′. A key assumption is that a decision maker's preference differences between acts given one state of the world should be independent of common consequences given other states of the world. Usefulness of this result is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rakesh Kumar Sarin, 1982. "Strength of Preference and Risky Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 982-997, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:30:y:1982:i:5:p:982-997
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.30.5.982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.982
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.30.5.982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denis Bouyssou & Jean-Claude Vansnick, 1990. "« Utilité cardinale » dans le certain et choix dans le risque," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 41(6), pages 979-1000.
    2. Kangas, Annika S. & Kangas, Jyrki, 2004. "Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 169-188, March.
    3. Baucells, Manel & Shapley, Lloyd S., 2008. "Multiperson utility," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 329-347, March.
    4. Schuwirth, N. & Reichert, P. & Lienert, J., 2012. "Methodological aspects of multi-criteria decision analysis for policy support: A case study on pharmaceutical removal from hospital wastewater," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 472-483.
    5. Han Bleichrodt & Magnus Johannesson, 1997. "An Experimental Test of a Theoretical Foundation for Rating-scale Valuations," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 208-216, April.
    6. Philippe Delquié, 2008. "The Value of Information and Intensity of Preference," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 129-139, September.
    7. Melissa Garber & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2017. "A Framework for Multiobjective Decision Management with Diverse Stakeholders," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 335-356, July.
    8. George Wu, 1999. "Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 159-199, April.
    9. Nakamura, Yutaka, 2015. "State-dependent strength-of-preference," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 64-68.
    10. Rakesh K. Sarin, 2021. "Just society," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 417-444, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:30:y:1982:i:5:p:982-997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.