IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ifs/fistud/v36y2015ip51-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is UK Vice Chancellor Pay Justified by University Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Ray Bachan
  • Barry Reilly

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray Bachan & Barry Reilly, 2015. "Is UK Vice Chancellor Pay Justified by University Performance?," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 36, pages 51-73, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:36:y:2015:i::p:51-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bell, Adrian R. & Brooks, Chris & Urquhart, Andrew, 2022. "Why have UK universities become more indebted over time?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 771-783.
    2. Bachan, Ray & Bryson, Alex, 2022. "The Gender Wage Gap Among University Vice Chancellors in the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Jill Johnes & Swati Virmani, 2020. "Chief executive pay in UK higher education: the role of university performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 547-576, May.
    4. Mohamed H Elmagrhi & Collins G Ntim, 2024. "Vice-Chancellor Pay and Performance: The Moderating Effect of Vice-Chancellor Characteristics," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 180-205, February.
    5. Lucey, Brian & Urquhart, Andrew & Zhang, Hanxiong, 2022. "UK Vice Chancellor compensation: Do they get what they deserve?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    6. Peter Ainsworth & Tom McKenzie, 2020. "On the benefits of risk‐sharing for post‐COVID higher education in the United Kingdom," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 446-453, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:36:y:2015:i::p:51-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Hyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.