IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v7y2017i2p105-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the H3C on Auditor Independence in French Context

Author

Listed:
  • Jamel Azibi
  • Hubert Tondeur
  • Hamza Azibi

Abstract

The H3C was created by the LSF Act of 2003 (LSF) to regulate the auditing profession in France. It is considered as an external control authority. The auditor independence is considered as the first preoccupation of this new authority. This paper focuses on the impact of the H3C on auditor independence in France context from 2002 to 2007. The first hypothesis is related to the establishment of the H3C and auditor independence and the second deals with the relation between the start of the inspection program and the auditor independence. Our data was obtained from Thomson Financial Data for 140 enterprises. The empirical results show that the auditor independence increases only after the creation of the H3C. Contrary to this result, the auditors' independence did not increase significantly after the announcement of the inspection process because the inspection process started in 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamel Azibi & Hubert Tondeur & Hamza Azibi, 2017. "The Impact of the H3C on Auditor Independence in French Context," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(2), pages 105-115, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:105-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/68540/37200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/68540
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Richard Baker & Alain Mikol & Reiner Quick, 2001. "Regulation of the statutory auditor in the European Union: a comparative survey of the United Kingdom, France and Germany," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 763-786.
    2. Quick, Reiner & Baker, R. & Mikol, A., 2001. "Regulation of the Statutory Auditor in the European Union: A Comparative Survey of the United Kingdom, France and Germany," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 67744, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreea Claudia CRUCEAN, 2020. "A Literature Review on the Auditor’s Independence Between Threats and Safeguards," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 1(7), pages 64-72, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Manel Jmal Derbel & Mohamed Ali Boujelbene, 2015. "La Conformite Comptabilite-Fiscalite Et La Gestion Des Resultats : Cas Des Entreprises Tunisiennes," Post-Print hal-01188533, HAL.
    3. Gabriele Jahn & Matthias Schramm & Achim Spiller, 2005. "The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 53-73, December.
    4. Joseph Weber & Michael Willenborg & Jieying Zhang, 2008. "Does Auditor Reputation Matter? The Case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 941-972, September.
    5. Robert Rieg, 2019. "Selbstständigkeit von Bilanzbuchhaltern und Controllern: Eine empirische Untersuchung zu Einkommen und Determinanten," ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 67(1), pages 35-66.
    6. Larsson, Bengt, 2005. "Auditor regulation and economic crime policy in Sweden, 1965-2000," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 127-144, February.
    7. John Preiato & Philip Brown & Ann Tarca, 2015. "A Comparison of Between-Country Measures of Legal Setting and Enforcement of Accounting Standards," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1-2), pages 1-50, January.
    8. Chung, Janne & Farrar, Jonathan & Puri, Poonam & Thorne, Linda, 2010. "Auditor liability to third parties after Sarbanes-Oxley: An international comparison of regulatory and legal reforms," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 66-78.
    9. Herve Stolowy, 2005. "Nothing like the Enron affair could happen in France (!)," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 405-415.
    10. Isabelle Fabioux, 2021. "Dynamique au sein de la sphère normative de l’audit en France (2001-2020)," Post-Print hal-03361493, HAL.
    11. Isabelle Fabioux, 2016. "Le processus de normalisation de l’audit : état de l’art et voies de recherches futures," Post-Print hal-01902563, HAL.
    12. Philip Brown & John Preiato & Ann Tarca, 2014. "Measuring Country Differences in Enforcement of Accounting Standards: An Audit and Enforcement Proxy," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1-2), pages 1-52, January.
    13. Metka Duhovnik, 2011. "Time to Endorse the ISAs for European Use: The Emerging Markets' Perspective," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 129-140.
    14. Beatriz García Osma & Ana Gisbert & Elena Heras Cristóbal, 2017. "Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 517-552, December.
    15. Cédric Lesage & Sabine Ratzinger & Jaana Kettunen, 2012. "Struggle over joint audit: on behalf of public interest?," Post-Print hal-00935004, HAL.
    16. Löhlein, Lukas, 2017. "Measuring the independence of audit oversight entities: a comparative empirical analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65370, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Hok-Ko Pong & Chun-Cheong Fong, 2023. "The Associations of Spirituality, Adversity Quotient and Ethical Decision Making of Accounting Managers in the Contexts of Financial Management and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Vlad‐Andrei Porumb & Abe De Jong & Carel Huijgen & Teye Marra & Jan Van Dalen, 2021. "The Effect of Auditor Style on Reporting Quality: Evidence from Germany," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(1), pages 1-26, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditor independence; H3C; audit fees;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:105-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.