IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/ijbfre/v7y2013i5p23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market REsponse to the Composition Change of Islamic Index: Evidence from Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Erie Febrian
  • Aldrin Herwany
  • Adi Primadhi

Abstract

Many studies have investigated how markets react to the change of conventional market index composition. Nevertheless, how investors in emerging markets react to changes to an Islamic Index composition still needs to be answered. This study empirically investigates market responses to composition changes of an Islamic Index using Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) daily data. The study also investigates five conventional Indices on the Indonesian Stock Exchange, i.e. LQ45, Kompas 100, Bisnis 27, Sri Kehati, and Pefindo25, and compares the results with those of JII. The goal is to see whether difference between the two indices explain the market reaction. To measure market reaction, we calculate the abnormal return, relative abnormal volume, relative abnormal frequency, and relative abnormal bid-ask spread around the announcement of index composition change. Our finding shows the market reacts positively to stocks newly included in an Islamic index, which is in line with the reaction to stock added in conventional indices. Similarly, the market responds to the stocks excluded from JII and from conventional indices in the same way.

Suggested Citation

  • Erie Febrian & Aldrin Herwany & Adi Primadhi, 2013. "Market REsponse to the Composition Change of Islamic Index: Evidence from Indonesia," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(5), pages 23-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:ijbfre:v:7:y:2013:i:5:p:23-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/ijbfre/ijbfr-v7n5-2013/IJBFR-V7N5-2013-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hess, Alan C & Frost, Peter A, 1982. "Tests for Price Effects of New Issues of Seasoned Securities," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 37(1), pages 11-25, March.
    2. Aditya Kaul & Vikas Mehrotra & Randall Morck, 2000. "Demand Curves for Stocks Do Slope Down: New Evidence from an Index Weights Adjustment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 893-912, April.
    3. Shinhua Liu, 2000. "Changes in the Nikkei 500: New Evidence for Downward Sloping Demand Curves for Stocks," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 1(4), pages 245-267, December.
    4. Erwin, Gayle R & Miller, James M, 1998. "The Liquidity Effects Associated with Addition of a Stock to the S&P 500 Index: Evidence from Bid/Ask Spreads," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 131-146, February.
    5. Kraus, Alan & Stoll, Hans R, 1972. "Price Impacts of Block Trading on the New York Stock Exchange," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 27(3), pages 569-588, June.
    6. Roll, Richard, 1984. "A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(4), pages 1127-1139, September.
    7. Shleifer, Andrei, 1986. "Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(3), pages 579-590, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nawal Seif Kassim & Roslily Ramlee & Salina Kassim, 2017. "Impact of Inclusion into and Exclusion from the Shariah Index on a Stock Price and Trading Volume: An Event Study Approach," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 40-51.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernest N. Biktimirov & Yuanbin Xu, 2019. "Market reactions to changes in the Dow Jones industrial average index," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 792-812, May.
    2. Afego, Pyemo N., 2017. "Effects of changes in stock index compositions: A literature survey," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 228-239.
    3. D'Mello, Ranjan & Ferris, Stephen P. & Hwang, Chuan Yang, 2003. "The tax-loss selling hypothesis, market liquidity, and price pressure around the turn-of-the-year," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 73-98, January.
    4. Škrinjarić Tihana, 2019. "Effects of changes in stock market index composition on stock returns: event study methodology on Zagreb Stock Exchange," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 43-54, May.
    5. Chakrabarti, Rajesh & Huang, Wei & Jayaraman, Narayanan & Lee, Jinsoo, 2005. "Price and volume effects of changes in MSCI indices - nature and causes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1237-1264, May.
    6. Wang, Chuan & Murgulov, Zoltan & Haman, Janto, 2015. "Impact of changes in the CSI 300 Index constituents," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 13-33.
    7. Ernest N. Biktimirov, 2004. "The Effect of Demand on Stock Prices: Evidence from Index Fund Rebalancing," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 39(3), pages 455-472, August.
    8. William B. Elliott & Bonnie F. Van Ness & Mark D. Walker & Richard S. Warr, 2006. "What Drives the S&P 500 Inclusion Effect? An Analytical Survey," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 35(4), pages 31-48, December.
    9. Kot, Hung Wan & Leung, Harry K.M. & Tang, Gordon Y.N., 2015. "The long-term performance of index additions and deletions: Evidence from the Hang Seng Index," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 407-420.
    10. Fernandes, Marcelo & Mergulhão, João, 2016. "Anticipatory effects in the FTSE 100 index revisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 79-90.
    11. Ken L. Bechmann, 2004. "Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the Danish Blue-Chip Index: The KFX Index," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 8(1-2), pages 3-34, March-Jun.
    12. Konstantina Kappou, 2018. "The diminished effect of index rebalances," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 235-244, July.
    13. Jung-Wook Kim & Jason Lee & Randall Morck, 2009. "Characteristics of Observed Limit Order Demand and Supply Schedules for Individual Stocks," NBER Working Papers 14733, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Atanasov, Vladimir & Merrick, John, 2011. "Financial asset demand is elastic: Evidence from new issues of Federal Home Loan Bank debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 3225-3239.
    15. Eric Nowak & Alexandra Gropp, 2002. "Ist der Ablauf der Lock-up-Frist bei Neuemissionen ein kursrelevantes Ereignis? Eine empirische Analyse von Unternehmen des Neuen Marktes," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 19-45, February.
    16. Zhihua Chen & Aziz A. Lookman & Norman Schürhoff & Duane J. Seppi, 2014. "Rating-Based Investment Practices and Bond Market Segmentation," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 162-205.
    17. J. Carlos Gómez Sala & Jorge Yzaguirre, 2003. "Presión sobre los precios en las revisiones del índice IBEX35," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 27(3), pages 491-531, September.
    18. Anna Obizhaeva, 2009. "Portfolio Transitions and Stock Price Dynamics," Working Papers w0224, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    19. Liu, Shinhua, 2011. "The price effects of index additions: A new explanation," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 152-165, March.
    20. Adrian Wai Kong Cheung, 2011. "Do Stock Investors Value Corporate Sustainability? Evidence from an Event Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(2), pages 145-165, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Market Reaction; Market Index; Abnormal Return; Abnormal Volume;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:ijbfre:v:7:y:2013:i:5:p:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.