IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v13y2019i2p13-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Missing Social Outcomes In Csr Reports Of Award Winners

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Wilburn
  • Ralph Wilburn

Abstract

Consumers increasingly expect transparency from companies practicing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and base their buying practices on what they see and hear about a company’s CSR initiatives. Unfortunately, many CSR reports resemble marketing materials, rather than data that shows what the actions have accomplished for those targeted stakeholder groups. CSR reports need to prove that companies have achieved outcomes, not just established goals. Companies need to demonstrate that their CSR initiatives are not just greenwashing to keep their consumers happy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the CSR/Sustainability Reports of twenty-one corporations that appear both in the CR Magazine’s 2018 100 Best Corporate Citizens and the World’s Most Reputable Companies for Corporate Social Responsibility for 2018 to see if they report outcome measures as well as goals. The study found that, although many of the corporations address the Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact and the UN 2013 Sustainable Development Goals in their reports, the initiatives that focus on the social elements have no data or outcomes for them, especially when they involve philanthropy to nonprofits. Only environmental goals had year-to-year data on progress toward goals

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Wilburn & Ralph Wilburn, 2019. "Missing Social Outcomes In Csr Reports Of Award Winners," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 13(2), pages 13-36.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:13:y:2019:i:2:p:13-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v13n2-2019/GJBR-V13N2-2019-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hopkins, 2005. "Measurement of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 213-231.
    2. Dan W. Hess, 2014. "The Framework for CSR Assessment, Measurement, and Reporting," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Bartholomew Okonkwo (ed.), Christian Ethics and Corporate Culture, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 177-192, Springer.
    3. Karl Widerquist, 2018. "The Bottom Line," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens, chapter 0, pages 93-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    5. Yuan-Shuh Lii & Monle Lee, 2012. "Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 69-81, January.
    6. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B. & Maines, Laureen A., 2010. "The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 445-453, September.
    7. Francesco Perrini & Antonio Tencati, 2006. "Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 296-308, September.
    8. Khaled Saadaoui & Teerooven Soobaroyen, 2018. "An analysis of the methodologies adopted by CSR rating agencies," Post-Print hal-01954551, HAL.
    9. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Gimeno-Arias & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano & Héctor Horacio Garza-Sánchez, 2021. "Using PLS-SEM to Analyze the Effect of CSR on Corporate Performance: The Mediating Role of Human Resources Management and Customer Satisfaction. An Empirical Study in the Spanish Food and Beverage Man," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    3. Charles H. Cho & Kathrin Bohr & Tony Jaehyun Choi & Katharine Partridge & Jhankrut Mukesh Shah & Ada Swierszcz, 2020. "Advancing Sustainability Reporting in Canada: 2019 Report on Progress," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 181-204, September.
    4. Tomasz L. Nawrocki & Danuta Szwajca, 2021. "A Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of Involvement in CSR Activities of Energy Companies in the Context of Sustainable Development Challenges: Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Jia Xu & Jiuchang Wei & Liangdong Lu, 2019. "Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1027-1044, September.
    6. Yasanur Kayikci & Yigit Kazancoglu & Nazlican Gozacan‐Chase & Cisem Lafci, 2022. "Analyzing the drivers of smart sustainable circular supply chain for sustainable development goals through stakeholder theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3335-3353, November.
    7. Jung-Fa Tsai & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Ming-Hua Lin & Duy-Van Nguyen & Hsu-Hao Lin & Anh-Tuan Ngo, 2021. "Impacts of Environmental Certificate and Pollution Abatement Equipment on SMEs’ Performance: An Empirical Case in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Francisco González Santa Cruz & Iliana Loor Alcívar & Nelly Moreira Mero & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of the Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 517-534, April.
    9. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    10. Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Gabriel López-Martínez & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability. A Bibliometric Analysis of Their Interrelations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Edilson Bacinello & Gérson Tontini & Anete Alberton, 2021. "Influence of corporate social responsibility on sustainable practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises: Implications on business performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 776-785, March.
    12. Barchiesi, Maria Assunta & Fronzetti Colladon, Andrea, 2021. "Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Paul Mansell & Simon P. Philbin & Efrosyni Konstantinou, 2020. "Redefining the Use of Sustainable Development Goals at the Organisation and Project Levels—A Survey of Engineers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, August.
    14. Kumar Ramesh & Raiswa Saha & Susoban Goswami & Sekar & Richa Dahiya, 2019. "Consumer's response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 377-387, March.
    15. Byung‐Jik Kim & Youngkyun Chang & Tae‐Hyun Kim, 2023. "Translating corporate social responsibility into financial performance: Exploring roles of work engagement and strategic coherence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2555-2573, September.
    16. Fornasari, Tommaso, 2020. "Il ruolo dei comitati di responsabilità sociale nella corporate governance [The Role of CSR Committees in Corporate Governance]," MPRA Paper 111192, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lu, Hao & Oh, Won-Yong & Kleffner, Anne & Chang, Young Kyun, 2021. "How do investors value corporate social responsibility? Market valuation and the firm specific contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 14-25.
    18. Junru Zhang & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2018. "Does Sustainability Engagement Affect Stock Return Volatility? Evidence from the Chinese Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    19. James Agarwal & Madelynn Stackhouse & Oleksiy Osiyevskyy, 2018. "I Love That Company: Look How Ethical, Prominent, and Efficacious It Is—A Triadic Organizational Reputation (TOR) Scale," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 889-910, December.
    20. Zia ur Rehman & Asad Khan & Asim Rahman, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility's influence on firm risk and firm performance: the mediating role of firm reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2991-3005, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Social Responsibility; Sustainable Development Goals; Global Reporting Initiative; Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:13:y:2019:i:2:p:13-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.