IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iag/reviea/v19y2022i1p89-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Agriculture – A New Paradigm Of Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria IORDACHI

    (National Institute of Economic Research, Republic of Moldova)

  • Nicolae POPA

    (National Institute of Economic Research, Republic of Moldova)

Abstract

One of the key challenges in the coming years is to produce enough safe and nutritious food for the future generations without exceeding the planetary reserves even more. In circular agriculture, waste is seen as a raw material to produce new valuable products, including crops, food, feed and energy. Another characteristic of the concept is the need to reduce the consumption of resources and discharges into the environment. This article analyzes the concept of circular agriculture as well as the necessary government policies for implementing this concept as the development paradigm. It is highly recommended for governments to promote circular agriculture, especially in the post COVID-19 period, as means to improve different objectives, including better environmental conditions, climate change mitigation, public health, etc. It is also recommended to support and facilitate the development of circular economy principles as well as to implement best practices from existing initiatives around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria IORDACHI & Nicolae POPA, 2022. "Circular Agriculture – A New Paradigm Of Economic Development," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 89-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:iag:reviea:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:89-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eadr.ro/RePEc/iag/iag_pdf/AERD2201_89-100.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Molinos-Senante & F. Hernandez-Sancho & R. Sala-Garrido, 2013. "Tariffs and Cost Recovery in Water Reuse," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(6), pages 1797-1808, April.
    2. Xiqiang Xia & Junhu Ruan, 2020. "Analyzing Barriers for Developing a Sustainable Circular Economy in Agriculture in China Using Grey-DEMATEL Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Daniel C. Miller & Pablo J. Ordonez & Kathy Baylis & Karl Hughes & Pushpendra Rana, 2017. "Protocol for an evidence and gap map The impacts of agroforestry on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well‐being in low‐ and middle‐income countries: an evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shivendra Kumar & Andrew Groth & Ljubo Vlacic, 2015. "Cost Evaluation of Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Water Price Index," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(9), pages 3343-3356, July.
    2. Liangxin Fan & Guobin Liu & Fei Wang & Coen Ritsema & Violette Geissen, 2014. "Domestic Water Consumption under Intermittent and Continuous Modes of Water Supply," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(3), pages 853-865, February.
    3. Tran, Quang Phu & Nguyen, The Kien & Dong, Manh Cuong, 2023. "Understanding Factors of Households' Circular Economy Adoption to Facilitate Sustainable Development in an Emerging Country," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 4(4), November.
    4. Oscar Zapata, 2018. "Industrial Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in a Developing Country Context: Evidence at the Firm Level from Ecuador," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Fagundes, Thalita Salgado & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2023. "Challenges of recycled water pricing," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Salah S. Hassan & Sameh Fayyad, 2023. "Farm-to-Fork and Sustainable Agriculture Practices: Perceived Economic Benefit as a Moderator and Environmental Sustainability as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Kucher, Lesia & Kucher, Anatolii & Morozova, Hanna & Pashchenko, Yulia, 2022. "Development of circular agricultural economy: potential sources of financing innovative projects," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.
    8. Ritika & Himanshu & Nawal Kishor, 2023. "Modeling of factors affecting investment behavior during the pandemic: a grey-DEMATEL approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 222-235, June.
    9. Sarah E. Castle & Daniel C. Miller & Pablo J. Ordonez & Kathy Baylis & Karl Hughes, 2021. "The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well‐being in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    10. Mohammad Kanan & Muhammad Salman Habib & Anam Shahbaz & Amjad Hussain & Tufail Habib & Hamid Raza & Zaher Abusaq & Ramiz Assaf, 2022. "A Grey-Fuzzy Programming Approach towards Socio-Economic Optimization of Second-Generation Biodiesel Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Nimni Pannila & Madushan Madhava Jayalath & Amila Thibbotuwawa & Izabela Nielsen & T.G.G. Uthpala, 2022. "Challenges in Applying Circular Economy Concepts to Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Jiangning Cao & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Analyzing and Prioritizing the Barriers and Solutions of Sustainable Agriculture for Promoting Sustainable Development Goals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Biao Li & Yunting Feng & Xiqiang Xia & Mengjie Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of China’s Circular Agriculture Performance and Analysis of the Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Daniel C. Miller & Pablo J. Ordoñez & Sarah E. Brown & Samantha Forrest & Noé J. Nava & Karl Hughes & Kathy Baylis, 2020. "The impacts of agroforestry on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well‐being in low‐and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    15. Chin, Hon Huin & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2023. "Novel circularity and sustainability assessment of symbiosis networks through the Energy Quality Pinch concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    16. Wolfgang Krinner, 2014. "Financial Analysis of the Spanish Water Sector," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(9), pages 2471-2490, July.
    17. Mariana Marchioni & Anita Raimondi & Maria Gloria Chiano & Umberto Sanfilippo & Stefano Mambretti & Gianfranco Becciu, 2023. "Costs-benefit Analysis for the use of Shallow Groundwater as non-conventional Water Resource," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(5), pages 2125-2142, March.
    18. Moisés Barbosa Junior & Eliane Pinheiro & Carla Cristiane Sokulski & Diego Alexis Ramos Huarachi & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2022. "How to Identify Barriers to the Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture? A Study Based on a Multi-Criteria Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    circular agriculture; sustainable development; nutritious food; agricultural waste; agricultural policy.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iag:reviea:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:89-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.