IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v11y2017i2p83-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Talent Management Process on the Research Performance of Faculty Members with the Mediating Role of Organizational Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Farzaneh Eghbal

    (University of Isfahan (Iran))

  • Reza Hoveida

    (University of Isfahan (Iran))

  • Seyed Ali Siadat Seyadat

    (University of Isfahan (Iran))

  • Hossein Samavatyan

    (University of Isfahan (Iran))

  • Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian

    (Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Iran))

Abstract

The research performance of faculty members is one of the main criteria for measuring university performance, and universities and higher education centers seek to improve it because of their purpose and the commitment that they feel towards various parts of society. The present research aims at determining the effects of the components of perceived talent management on the research performance of faculty members with the mediating role of perceived organizational justice. The research is a correlational-descriptive study based on structural equations and its statistical population consists of the faculty members at the University of Isfahan, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Isfahan University of Technology. For the sample size, using the SPSS Sample Power software, out of 562 individuals, 130 were selected using stratified random sampling proportional to sample size. For data collection, faculty members’ research performance record, a talent management questionnaire and a perceived organizational justice questionnaire were used. Convergent validity for both questionnaires (AVE) was calculated to be more than 0.5 and the reliability of both questionnaires using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated to be more than 0.75. Data analysis was performed using the Smart PLS 3.2.6 statistical software. Findings indicated that the components of the variables of perceived talent management and perceived organizational justice constitute a total of 61% of the variance of the variable of research performance and the mediating role of the variable of perceived organizational justice was calculated to be insignificant. As a result, it can be said that improvement of talent management process components can lead to increased faculty members’ perceived organizational justice and ultimately improved research performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzaneh Eghbal & Reza Hoveida & Seyed Ali Siadat Seyadat & Hossein Samavatyan & Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian, 2017. "The Effect of Talent Management Process on the Research Performance of Faculty Members with the Mediating Role of Organizational Justice," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 83-91.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:83-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2017/07/10/1171234793/6-Hoveida-83-91.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sitnicki Maksym W., 2018. "Determining the Priorities of the Development of EU Research Universities Based on the Analysis of Rating Indicators of World-Class Universities," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 76-100, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    perceived talent management; perceived organizational justice; research performance; faculty members;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:83-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.