IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p1004-d101088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Specification and Description Language for Life Cycle Assesment in Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Pau Fonseca i Casas

    (Statistics and Operations Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona-Tech, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Antoni Fonseca i Casas

    (Polyhedra Tech SL, 08026 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The definition of a Life Cycle Assesment (LCA) for a building or an urban area is a complex task due to the inherent complexity of all the elements that must be considered. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary approach is required due to the different sources of knowledge involved in this project. This multidisciplinary approach makes it necessary to use formal language to fully represent the complexity of the used models. In this paper, we explore the use of Specification and Description Language (SDL) to represent the LCA of a building and residential area. We also introduce a tool that uses this idea to implement an optimization and simulation mechanism to define the optimal solution for the sustainability of a specific building or residential.

Suggested Citation

  • Pau Fonseca i Casas & Antoni Fonseca i Casas, 2017. "Using Specification and Description Language for Life Cycle Assesment in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1004-:d:101088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoni Fonseca i Casas & Pau Fonseca i Casas & Josep Casanovas, 2016. "Analysis of Applications to Improve the Energy Savings in Residential Buildings Based on Systemic Quality Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Eva Llera-Sastresa & Sabina Scarpellini & Pilar Rivera-Torres & Juan Aranda & Ignacio Zabalza-Bribián & Alfonso Aranda-Usón, 2017. "Energy Vulnerability Composite Index in Social Housing, from a Household Energy Poverty Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Anand, Chirjiv Kaur & Amor, Ben, 2017. "Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 408-416.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasiliki Pachta & Vasiliki Giourou, 2022. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Historic and a Modern School Building, Located in the City of Naoussa, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianluca Trotta & Kirsten Gram-Hanssen & Pernille Lykke Jørgensen, 2020. "Heterogeneity of Electricity Consumption Patterns in Vulnerable Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Kong, Minjin & Lee, Minhyun & Kang, Hyuna & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "Development of a framework for evaluating the contents and usability of the building life cycle assessment tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Mastrucci, Alessio & Marvuglia, Antonino & Leopold, Ulrich & Benetto, Enrico, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of building stocks from urban to transnational scales: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 316-332.
    4. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Ben Amor & Pierre Blanchet, 2018. "Evaluating the Link between Low Carbon Reductions Strategies and Its Performance in the Context of Climate Change: A Carbon Footprint of a Wood-Frame Residential Building in Quebec, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Kim, Rakhyun & Tae, Sungho & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Development of low carbon durability design for green apartment buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 263-272.
    6. Cellura, Maurizio & Guarino, Francesco & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2017. "Modeling the energy and environmental life cycle of buildings: A co-simulation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 733-742.
    7. Henrik Engelbrecht Foldager & Rasmus Camillus Jeppesen & Muhyiddine Jradi, 2019. "DanRETRO: A Decision-Making Tool for Energy Retrofit Design and Assessment of Danish Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Xingqiang Song & Christel Carlsson & Ramona Kiilsgaard & David Bendz & Helene Kennedy, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Geotechnical Works in Building Construction: A Review and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Helena Nydahl & Staffan Andersson & Anders P. Åstrand & Thomas Olofsson, 2019. "Environmental Performance Measures to Assess Building Refurbishment from a Life Cycle Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Lee, Nayoon & Tae, Sungho & Gong, Yuri & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Integrated building life-cycle assessment model to support South Korea's green building certification system (G-SEED)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 43-50.
    11. Gimeno-Frontera, Beatriz & Mainar-Toledo, María Dolores & Sáez de Guinoa, Aitana & Zambrana-Vasquez, David & Zabalza-Bribián, Ignacio, 2018. "Sustainability of non-residential buildings and relevance of main environmental impact contributors' variability. A case study of food retail stores buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 669-681.
    12. Scarpellini, Sabina & Alexia Sanz Hernández, M. & Moneva, José M. & Portillo-Tarragona, Pilar & Rodríguez, María Esther López, 2019. "Measurement of spatial socioeconomic impact of energy poverty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 320-331.
    13. Neethi Rajagopalan & Stijn Brancart & Sofie De Regel & Anne Paduart & Niels De Temmerman & Wim Debacker, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing in Circular Building Design: A Case Study for Wall Partitioning Systems in the Circular Retrofit Lab," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Lowans, Christopher & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Rooney, David & Foley, Aoife M., 2021. "What is the state of the art in energy and transport poverty metrics? A critical and comprehensive review," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Edward Majewski & Anna Komerska & Jerzy Kwiatkowski & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Marlena Gołaś & Kinga Pogodzińska & Jean-Loup Lecoeur & Barbara Tocco & Áron Török & Michele, 2020. "Are Short Food Supply Chains More Environmentally Sustainable than Long Chains? A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Eco-Efficiency of Food Chains in Selected EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Agnieszka Biernat-Jarka & Paulina Trębska & Sławomir Jarka, 2021. "The Role of Renewable Energy Sources in Alleviating Energy Poverty in Households in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Pomponi, Francesco & Moncaster, Alice, 2018. "Scrutinising embodied carbon in buildings: The next performance gap made manifest," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2431-2442.
    18. Mei Song & Jia Zhang & Xiaohao Liu & Liyan Zhang & Xuguang Hao & Mengxue Li, 2023. "Developments and Trends in Energy Poverty Research—Literature Visualization Analysis Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Arning, K. & Offermann-van Heek, J. & Ziefle, M., 2021. "What drives public acceptance of sustainable CO2-derived building materials? A conjoint-analysis of eco-benefits vs. health concerns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Geng, Shengnan & Wang, Yuan & Zuo, Jian & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Mao, Guozhu, 2017. "Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 176-184.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1004-:d:101088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.