IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p206-d65010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City

Author

Listed:
  • Minako Hara

    (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, 3-9-11, Midori-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo 180-8585, Japan)

  • Tomomi Nagao

    (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, 3-9-11, Midori-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo 180-8585, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shinsuke Hannoe

    (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, 3-9-11, Midori-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo 180-8585, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiro Nakamura

    (NTT Advanced Technology Corporation, Kanagawa 212-0014, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

We propose key performance indicators (KPIs) based on the Gross Social Feel-Good Index to evaluate a smart sustainable city and report the results of a field trial in a city located almost at the center of the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. We developed KPIs based on the following concepts: (1). The triple bottom line is the basic evaluation criteria; (2). The same unit is used for every evaluation criterion; (3). The KPIs can be used to assess a diverse range of smart sustainable cities with different goals. With the proposed KPIs of smart sustainable cities, indicators are divided into four layers for simplicity: the triple bottom line and “satisfaction” lie in the first layer. Since the notion of “society” is broad, it is further split into “safety”, “health”, and “comfort”, which are positioned in the second layer. The third layer includes indicators such as “information security” and “ubiquitous society” from the perspective of information communication technology (ICT). We conducted a trial evaluation by applying the proposed KPIs to individual ICT solutions of “Internet Protocol announcements”, “Wi-Fi around the station” and “information transmission and control” which have already been installed in a smart sustainable city.

Suggested Citation

  • Minako Hara & Tomomi Nagao & Shinsuke Hannoe & Jiro Nakamura, 2016. "New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:206-:d:65010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/206/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/206/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulawiak, Marcin & Lubniewski, Zbigniew, 2014. "SafeCity — A GIS-based tool profiled for supporting decision making in urban development and infrastructure protection," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 174-187.
    2. Akçura, M. Tolga & Avci, S. Burcu, 2014. "How to make global cities: Information communication technologies and macro-level variables," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 68-79.
    3. Renata Paola Dameri & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, 2014. "Smart City and Value Creation," Progress in IS, in: Renata Paola Dameri & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux (ed.), Smart City, edition 127, pages 1-12, Springer.
    4. Rob Kitchin, 2015. "Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 131-136.
    5. Appel, Sheila U. & Botti, Derek & Jamison, James & Plant, Leslie & Shyr, Jing Y. & Varshney, Lav R., 2014. "Predictive analytics can facilitate proactive property vacancy policies for cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 161-173.
    6. Robert G. Hollands, 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, December.
    7. Alberto Vanolo, 2014. "Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 883-898, April.
    8. Namdeo, A. & Tiwary, A. & Dziurla, R., 2014. "Spatial planning of public charging points using multi-dimensional analysis of early adopters of electric vehicles for a city region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 188-200.
    9. Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Cuadra, L. & Alexandre-Cortizo, E. & Jiménez-Fernández, S. & Portilla-Figueras, A., 2014. "Soft-Computing: An innovative technological solution for urban traffic-related problems in modern cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 236-244.
    10. Steenbruggen, John & Nijkamp, Peter & van der Vlist, Maarten, 2014. "Urban traffic incident management in a digital society," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 245-261.
    11. Spickermann, Alexander & Grienitz, Volker & von der Gracht, Heiko A., 2014. "Heading towards a multimodal city of the future?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 201-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Chu & Mingwang Cheng & Ning Neil Yu, 2022. "Development potential of Chinese smart cities and its spatio‐temporal pattern: A new hybrid MADM method using combination weight," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1546-1566, December.
    2. Tong Ye & Yi Zhuang & Gongzhe Qiao, 2023. "SCKPISec: A KPI-Guided Model-Based Approach to Realize Security by Design for Smart City Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, January.
    3. Grazia Ghermandi & Sara Fabbi & Barbara Arvani & Giorgio Veratti & Alessandro Bigi & Sergio Teggi, 2017. "Impact Assessment of Pollutant Emissions in the Atmosphere from a Power Plant over a Complex Terrain and under Unsteady Winds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Mubarak Saad Almutairi, 2024. "Evolutionary Multi-Objective Feature Selection Algorithms on Multiple Smart Sustainable Community Indicator Datasets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Dries Couckuyt & Toshi H. Arimura & Takuro Miyamoto & Naonari Yajima, 2023. "Green Policymaking in Japanese Municipalities: An Empirical Study on External and Internal Contextual Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    7. Larissa Diana Michelam & Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Tan Yigitcanlar & Ana Cristina Fachinelli & Leonardo Vils & Wilson Levy, 2021. "Leveraging Smart and Sustainable Development via International Events: Insights from Bento Gonçalves Knowledge Cities World Summit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Juan Lin & Zhou Yu & Yehua Dennis Wei & Mingfeng Wang, 2017. "Internet Access, Spillover and Regional Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Enrico Ivaldi & Lara Penco & Gabriele Isola & Enrico Musso, 2020. "Smart Sustainable Cities and the Urban Knowledge-Based Economy: A NUTS3 Level Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 45-72, July.
    10. Anne Immonen & Maria Kopsakangas-Savolainen, 2022. "Capturing Consumers’ Awareness and the Intention to Support Carbon Neutrality through Energy Efficient Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Nammi Kim & Seungwoo Yang, 2021. "Characteristics of Conceptually Related Smart Cities (CRSCs) Services from the Perspective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-48, March.
    12. Víctor-Raúl López-Ruiz & José-Luis Alfaro-Navarro & Domingo Nevado-Peña, 2019. "An Intellectual Capital Approach to Citizens’ Quality of Life in Sustainable Cities: A Focus on Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    13. José-Luis Alfaro-Navarro & Víctor-Raúl López-Ruiz & Domingo Nevado Peña, 2017. "A New Sustainability City Index Based on Intellectual Capital Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Wioletta Wereda & Justyna Stochaj, 2020. "The Security of the Local Community and Tourists Resulting from the Implementation of ICT in Cities: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 530-551.
    15. Gabrielli do Livramento Gonçalves & Walter Leal Filho & Samara da Silva Neiva & André Borchardt Deggau & Manoela de Oliveira Veras & Flávio Ceci & Maurício Andrade de Lima & José Baltazar Salgueirinho, 2021. "The Impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Smart and Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Escolar, Soledad & Villanueva, Félix J. & Santofimia, Maria J. & Villa, David & Toro, Xavier del & López, Juan Carlos, 2019. "A Multiple-Attribute Decision Making-based approach for smart city rankings design," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 42-55.
    17. Jan Alpenberg & Tomasz Wnuk-Pel & Amanda Henebäck, 2018. "Environmental Orientation in Swedish Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Seng Boon Lim & Chee Kong Yong & Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Mohd Fuad Mat Jali & Abd Hair Awang & Zurinah Tahir, 2020. "Effectiveness of Fear and Crime Prevention Strategy for Sustainability of Safe City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coletta, Claudio & Heaphy, Liam & Kitchin, Rob, 2017. "From the accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of ‘Smart Dublin’," SocArXiv 93ga5, Center for Open Science.
    2. Malene Freudendal-Pedersen & Sven Kesselring & Eriketti Servou, 2019. "What is Smart for the Future City? Mobilities and Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.
    4. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2018. "Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 330-339.
    5. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2019. "Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Kitchin, Rob & Cardullo, Paolo & Di Feliciantonio, Cesare, 2018. "Citizenship, Justice and the Right to the Smart City," SocArXiv b8aq5, Center for Open Science.
    7. Desdemoustier, Jonathan & Crutzen, Nathalie & Giffinger, Rudolf, 2019. "Municipalities' understanding of the Smart City concept: An exploratory analysis in Belgium," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-141.
    8. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 70-97.
    9. Constance Carr & Markus Hesse, 2020. "When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto’s Waterfront: New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 69-83.
    10. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    11. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    12. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    13. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy & Crutzen, Nathalie, 2019. "Smart cities and the citizen-driven internet of things: A qualitative inquiry into an emerging smart city," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 44-53.
    14. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Seema Mundoli & Hita Unnikrishnan & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "The “Sustainable” in smart cities: ignoring the importance of urban ecosystems," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 44(2), pages 103-120, June.
    16. Cardullo, Paolo, 2018. "Commoning the smart city: A case for a public Internet provision," SocArXiv u8dk2, Center for Open Science.
    17. Diogo Correia & Leonor Teixeira & João Lourenço Marques, 2021. "Reviewing the State-of-the-Art of Smart Cities in Portugal: Evidence Based on Content Analysis of a Portuguese Magazine," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, October.
    18. Jason Miklian & Kristian Hoelscher, 2017. "Smart Cities, Mobile Technologies and Social Cohesion in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Oomens, Ivette M. F. & Sadowski, Bert M., 2017. "The importance of value creation in smart city initiatives: An ecosystem approach," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169491, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    20. Lily Kong & Orlando Woods, 2018. "The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 679-701, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:206-:d:65010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.